Ragequit Factory [PVP]

[zhangvict]

I tried using it tonight and found the biggest problems are immaterial creatures (e.g. immortals and flying glories, quinted otys) and growing creatures. Needs more healing IMO.

[silinda]

For speed, it doesn't seem that fast but a bigger issue I've had with pvp is black hole, and since this is a rainbow deck, it definitely isn't blackhole proof...

is the OP saying that since the low cost of the cards or the mass amount of towers, it shouldn't have much trouble with black holes?

Maybe I'm reading this wrong and PVP doesn't carry over to arena...? I can see folks ragequitting after a few turns of seeing this deck roll. Until you hit an hourglass, it doesn't seem faster then any other deck but once those come out, it does seem pretty decent.



Would it be worth switching sanctuary for one bond and swapping the photon for the PU/TU like pulli suggested?

Maybe dropping 1 or 2 towers for the above items? would that throw off your quantum production too much?

[Chapuz]

For speed, it doesn't seem that fast but a bigger issue I've had with pvp is black hole, and since this is a rainbow deck, it definitely isn't blackhole proof...

is the OP saying that since the low cost of the cards or the mass amount of towers, it shouldn't have much trouble with black holes?

Maybe I'm reading this wrong and PVP doesn't carry over to arena...? I can see folks ragequitting after a few turns of seeing this deck roll. Until you hit an hourglass, it doesn't seem faster then any other deck but once those come out, it does seem pretty decent.

Would it be worth switching sanctuary for one bond and swapping the photon for the PU/TU like pulli suggested?

Maybe dropping 1 or 2 towers for the above items? would that throw off your quantum production too much?

Playing with a deckout deck against arena isn't de happiest idea xD
Of course it has its counters, like supermassive blackholes when they come before you can play the fitst sanctuary, or decks with lots of tiny creatures (like life rush) that walk over the 3 antimatters this deck has (with a late innundation).

It has been designed for PVP2 other than arena, and works much better there.

[burpcow]

Amazing.  I had so much fun with this in PVP just now.

[eaglgenes101]

Would aflatoxining your photon, and then add an emphatic bond be clever?

two turns of risk (but who wastes a cc on a photon / cell?). But you're guaranteed to outheal anything.

Or maybe: parellel universe a cell :p

Use ball lightning for that instead. It dies more quickly.

[Chapuz]

Would aflatoxining your photon, and then add an emphatic bond be clever?
two turns of risk (but who wastes a cc on a photon / cell?). But you're guaranteed to outheal anything.
Or maybe: parellel universe a cell :p

Use ball lightning for that instead. It dies more quickly.

No, if the oponent has CC and I have a single cell, a smart person would know htere is a strategy on it and would kill it.
Yeah, changed to a spark ^^

[Mammalman]

Pretty cool deck. I'll just add to the list of possible counters though: a druid/elf-based mutation deck. as long as i get one of those in the middle 5 (it's fine if you anti matter it) then all the cells become targets and more likely than not i'll get some big beasties in time. note that when you antimatter them i'll just re-mutate them.

[TheAccuso]

i'd will say change the spark for a photon

[Captain Scibra]

Needs a Rewind for those last-draw Eternities.  Also, wouldn't hurt for a Time Tower for those decks with a decent punch of quanta control.

[Chapuz]

i'd will say change the spark for a photon

vv
v

Use ball lightning for that instead. It dies more quickly.

Needs a Rewind for those last-draw Eternities.  Also, wouldn't hurt for a Time Tower for those decks with a decent punch of quanta control.

I can say the rewind will help in 1/30 games and bother in the other 29 
And I don't think adding time towers will be a great idea, as the strategy is to have the stall ASAP and by the time you play the Eternity you will have enough quanta to use it tones of times ^^

[Gandora]

Would SoB work better than the hourglass?

And if the QT give enough time you could change to mark. I don't know, but it feels like the possibility to draw 3 cards in one turn allows a faster setup than to draw 2 cards per turn.
But I'm not sure about it, just asking

[Chapuz]

Would SoB work better than the hourglass?

I'm not a SoBr fan in non-denial decks, because if the oponent has enough quanta generation it will be better for him too. Also, you can't cast it whenever you want because you will draw the same amount of cards the oponent can, whick can be also zero.