Breaking this deck down, we have 7 weapons which can be divided into 3 categories:
a) Weapons with passive skills:
Discord(3
- 4 damage with partial quanta denial),
Arsenic(2
2 damage cumulative poison),
Vampire Stiletto(2
4 damage + heal)
b) Weapons with active skills requiring quanta of their Mark:
Owl's eye 5
and 2
for active skill 5 damage,
Lobo 3 + 2
- 5 damage
c) Weapons with active skills requiring quanta of another mark:
Pulverizer 4
+ 3
for skill - 5 damage,
Trident 3
+ 3
for skill - 4 damage.
Weapons not used :
Druidic staff 2
with passive skill - low damage of 2, 5 heal
Titan 5
with passive skill - 7 damage, momentum
Morning Star 5
- 7 damage, cant be targeted
Fahrenheit 3
passive skill - 4+x damage
Eternity 6
+ 3
for active skill - 4 damage
Now weapons which will have quanta conflict:Titan if Pulvi is used.
Pulvi if trident is used.
And weapons requiring a lot of quanta:Owl's eye - Necessary CC.
Eternity - too costly to be effective
Pulvi - PC, who doesn't want.
Trident - Quanta denial*
(* Condition apply effective if drawn early - now thats a slim chance in 30 card deck)
High damage Weapons:
Morning star (Will have contest for
if crusader are used), Titan
So if are we to choose 7 weapons:CC - Owl's eye
PC - Pulvi
Suporting Cast - Discord, Arsenic, Vampire Stiletto
2 out of 4 - Lobo or Druidic staff or Morning star or Fahrenheit
Weapons not used Trident, Titan, Eternity plus 2 from above.
Since the deck cannot rush the opponent, We can use crusaders to add firepower or stall/control.
7 weapons + 6 flying weapons, that's 13 cards already. That leaves us 17 cards for quanta source, crusaders/stalling/control cards.
This deck may need around 10 quanta pillars. Which leaves us 7 cards.
Options:
Shields if crusaders are used: Skull 3
, Solar 3
, Fog 2
others-
titanium 4 ,
Emerald 5 ,
Ice 6 ,
Procastination 6 If going for Control/Stall CC: Lightning 2
, Reverse time 2
, shockwave 2
, Plague 4
, BB 2
, rage potion 3
, freeze 1
Heal: Heal 3
, Holy light 1
For this deck
I agree using Solar shield to generate
quanta is good idea.
What
Devourer proposed:
Against AI3, using this deck I won 14 games out of 25 with 2 EM(when crusaders can endow a early Vampire Stiletto), losses mainly to fire and dark(lost all 4), rush from firefly queen, rainbow, and bad RNG. Ya fun. But dunno how this will play in pvp.
I think going
way using dimension shield, quintessence with few above mentioned stalling/control cards, making a fat deck will be a nice idea. Gonna try and see what I can come up with.
To be continued.