my the best rainbow deck ..

[RedRevive]

ps. i reread more carefully a despicable handbag fight in this thread .. it definitely seems like some local forum stars are touched in theirs manhood .. so stop be ashamed, stop acting like intolerant nazi ..

i could/can/would/will say my opinions and pass my experiences .. although on internet is not a big democracy ..

@yaladilae :: i agree, that if someone always do and always did something wrong and adopts it as *only-right-way, he cannot change his mind so easily, but anyway, he shouldn't forgot that ::

Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength. - Eric Hoffer

.. sorry

Man, you don't need to curse to emphasize that your deck is good -___-

I like it.  Although I'm not a huge fan of larger rainbows, if it works for you, then it's good.  I would say that even when there are several "standard" variants to FG rainbows, almost everyone puts in their own tweaks (adding or subtracting one card, maybe throwing in a PA ...etc.), so tbh, if you like the deck, and it works for you, keep on trekking (just remember that everyone has their own favorite decks haha)

[Deedle]

I built this deck in the trainer exactly it went 2-8 in 10 games

It was slow, and boring to play.  Out rushed on almost every game, 2 losses were to Osiris 

[ntz]

heya .. i upped a lot of cards from my deck .. mostly pillars ..

i can agree, that with upgraded pillars are chances much more better. i can beat now a FGs which were even impossibly vincible in past .. here it comes:

Code: [Select]

52r 52r 592 5c6 5c6 5ro 5rp 5rp 5rp 5rp 5rp 5rp 5up 5up 61t 621 621 621 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6rm 6rm 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6u6 74b 74b 77f 7do 7n3 7n3 7q5 7q5 7q5 7q5
it seems like wins percantage with this deck is more then 50% (?66%) and i can beat a very easily a bastards like octane for example ..

but anyway, i still belive that the best for begginners without **any upped card should be to buy some ae immortal creatures + shields and go forward beating FGs ..

regards

ps. btw. i resented and still dislike rainbow decks against real players .. it's a kind of insult to bother someone with this horribleness .. i use this deck only against FGs since i have many upped cards and can if want prepare some just another 30 card brutally fast deck .. my favourites are 30cards fire, time or ae ..

[crudmonkey]

heya .. i upped a lot of cards from my deck .. mostly pillars ..

i can agree, that with upgraded pillars are chances much more better. i can beat now a FGs which were even impossibly vincible in past .. here it comes:

Code: [Select]

52r 52r 592 5c6 5c6 5ro 5rp 5rp 5rp 5rp 5rp 5rp 5up 5up 61t 621 621 621 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6rm 6rm 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6u6 74b 74b 77f 7do 7n3 7n3 7q5 7q5 7q5 7q5
it seems like wins percantage with this deck is more then 50% (?66%) and i can beat a very easily a bastards like octane for example ..

but anyway, i still belive that the best for begginners without **any upped card should be to buy some ae immortal creatures + shields and go forward beating FGs ..

regards

ps. btw. i resented and still dislike rainbow decks against real players .. it's a kind of insult to bother someone with this horribleness .. i use this deck only against FGs since i have many upped cards and can if want prepare some just another 30 card brutally fast deck .. my favourites are 30cards fire, time or ae ..

can you post results for this? (stats)

[Tea is good]

yeh stats would be good, its just those kind of dominance in late stage game deck, it might not work well if FGs pull out a quick rush offence in early rounds.

I think all the FGs are capable of quick dominance.

[tinkady]

yeh stats would be good, its just those kind of dominance in late stage game deck, it might not work well if FGs pull out a quick rush offence in early rounds.

I think all the FGs are capable of quick dominance.

not neptune
anyways this may or may not be better than SG's deck (havent actually examined/tested it) but if it is its probably because it uses shards. if SG's deck used shards (it doesnt so that its viable for beginners) it'd probably be better. 60 cards is just too much, will give you too many bad draws

[Wynden]

considering SG's deck is for newer players who can't upgrade too many cards, it's not really the best (no offense intended), however everyone has their own playing style, so one person might be better with it than another.

The big things I see in this deck that are gaps are the excess of certain types of quanta and the SoD. It's missing a lot of earth, fire, water, and light usage.
*referring to your updated one*

earth can't really be helped, unless you decide to add some graboids or something.
+1 Rain of Fire/ +2 Fire Bolt/+1 Fahreinheit +1 Flying Weapon
+1 Permafrost shield
+1 Miracle
+1 Steal
-2 SoD
-4 Quantum Towers

[miniwally]

The new one is starting to look a lot more like the classic rainbow. I expect it too have a much better winning percentage than your previous deck.

[ntz]

i have the best results with:

Code: [Select]

5rp 5rp 5rp 5rp 5rp 621 621 621 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6tt 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u6 6u7 6u7 717 717 71b 71b 74b 74b 77f 7am 7am 7do 7do 7gp 7k2 7n5 7q5 7q5 7q5 7t9 7t9 7ta
it's really very fast (in meaning of gaining money per time units) farmer

[beego]

How can you say that scaregirls deck is crap compared to yours, when you CLEARLY based your deck on scaredgirls?

A lot of us use a variation of the same deck. But no way would I be that arrogant, if I think I found a build that was slightly better than the original.

That being said. Your deck looks like crap.

[Masterfurry]

I know this post is pretty damn old but I have a few things to say....

1. The deck is ok, i have not yet tried on FG's because I cannot obtain a Pharaoh and some of the cards are not upgraded but i have tried on A13 and Half Bloods and it works well, but if u add an Enternity or 3 and other weapons then it will be a little better, just take out some cards that usually never come up...  and u would use save the Enternity until ur last used weapon so u can keep Rewinding a card so u dont lose and have atleast one card in ur deck... or dont over use ur Hourglasses or just have less than 4.

2. A Pregnition would be a good card so you can see your opponents hand and see if they have the card that destroys any permant (i forget the name of the card, soz)

3. ntz, the card deck you said that works best for you, doesn't make sense, I don't see any card that can make a lot of creatures on your battle feild that your Druid could work off unless you are betting that your Graveyards will give u a lot of Skeletons to work of, if that one card destroys one or even BOTH then u are screwed unless you had an Improved Steal to steal a graveyard or FFQ or something.. or a Pharaoh...  I am soz, but that deck doesn't seem that good, i liked ur first one it was pretty good to me... both ur decks seem more of a defensive deck than offensive which is good but can be bad if all ur doing is defending ur health and u have no people...

PS - I know you don't want to read all of it but this may help you, I know making a rainbow deck that is effective is hard but Google all the decks u can and try to see what cards come together good for you... u say the deck is good for you but i think a better deck would be better, some of the cards you only have 1 of and the LUCK of drawing That card with another good card after is SLIM even if u have hourglasses and if u over use the hourglass and u dont have Eternity, then u are screwed and Dont diss Scared Girl she is an experienced player, more than you, i think she would know what the hell she is talking about... END OF DISCUSSION xD

[manaboy100]

That deck is the best!!1!!11!


BTW Happy April Fools day xD

Spoiled deck with spoiled maker are just the best at this kind of time xD