Growthbow (untested)

[willng3]

It's my first time.  Anyway's if you can't say anything nice dont say it.  Also I want helpful suggestions.  Not huge criticsm over how Antagon's is better or that im over/under using something.   So stop alright.

That's not why I am reacting negatively about this deck at all. If you posted a deck that was bit flawed just because you were new, and if I felt like it, I would proably have posted helpful suggestion. What I find ridiculous about this deck is the fact that it's basically a copy (intentionally or not) of antagon's rainbow with some cards switched with much worse choices. Besides, what's the point of "beginner's" anything at all? This deck costs pretty much same as antagon's rainbow. If I was a "beginner" in this game, I'd prefer one that runs well, not a knockoff that costs the same and runs much worse.

The purpose of posting decks is to give other players a chance to offer suggestions as to how to improve it.  I find it incredibly insulting that you're accusing this deck to be a copy of Antagon's rainbow with a few substitutions...there are 13 differences from PVP Graboid Rainbow; that's not a knockoff, that's a different take on a Speedbow.  If you simply assume that all unupped speedbows are knockoffs to PVP Graboid Rainbow then there would be absolutely no purpose to posting new perspectives of the unupped speedbow.  It's been stated several times that PVP Graboid Rainbow is better than this, true, but how does that help the poster to improve his own deck to gain more potential?

[Jangoo]

lulz, FG's. Okay, now I know he's making a big joke out of it. For what purpose, I'm not sure.

To be completely honest: I am 99% sure that this thread and deck is a hoax.
(kinda like Outcasts (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,1068.0.html))

Especially when wavemaster stated he was a first-timer, while boasting an
incredible 150+ forum-posts I couldn't help but rofl all over the place.

I mean, come on people ... "speed"-rainbow? What the ...

[Ryli]

not too sure about the devourers and photon having a place, and I wouldn't have a 3rd life card, but apart from that it's ok. Definately not a SPEED rainbow though.

[BC]

...I find it incredibly insulting that you're accusing this deck to be a copy of Antagon's rainbow with a few substitutions...there are 13 differences from PVP Graboid Rainbow; that's not a knockoff, that's a different take on a Speedbow...

Now this is rich. You're insulted? I can imagine that OP might be insulted, but this totally stumps me. For my part, I did not explicitly accuse him of intentionally copying the deck at all, and I'm not even the one who brought up antagon's deck first.
But you if asked me what I really thought about this deck, do you seriously think new people are so bad that they will put a photon or devourer in a speed rainbow deck? What about the fire mark? Things that don't make any sense at all can be attributed to the fact that the deck creator probably just found that generic "speed rainbows" work well and tried to switch couple cards out with nonsensical ones and slap his name on it.

[willng3]

...I find it incredibly insulting that you're accusing this deck to be a copy of Antagon's rainbow with a few substitutions...there are 13 differences from PVP Graboid Rainbow; that's not a knockoff, that's a different take on a Speedbow...

Now this is rich. You're insulted? I can imagine that OP might be insulted, but this totally stumps me. For my part, I did not explicitly accuse him of intentionally copying the deck at all, and I'm not even the one who brought up antagon's deck first.
But you if asked me what I really thought about this deck, do you seriously think new people are so bad that they will put a photon or devourer in a speed rainbow deck? What about the fire mark? Things that don't make any sense at all can be attributed to the fact that the deck creator probably just found that generic "speed rainbows" work well and tried to switch couple cards out with nonsensical ones and slap his name on it.

I'm going to limit my reply to this to prevent this from becoming bigger than it already has.
I did not say I was insulted, I said your statement was insulting to 7wavemaster, the OP.
I'm in agreement with your statement regarding the copying of the deck and I'm not going to address it again.
I could respond to that last bit but I won't.  There's no sense in continuing to beat a dead horse; you've already made your points very clear so let it rest.

[Jangoo]

[...] do you seriously think new people are so bad that they will put a photon or devourer in a speed rainbow deck? What about the fire mark? Things that don't make any sense at all can be attributed to the fact that the deck creator probably just found that generic "speed rainbows" work well and tried to switch couple cards out with nonsensical ones [...]

Ooooooor ... it's a hoax ... "What about the fire-mark?" hahaha ... good one.

[BC]

Ooooooor ... it's a hoax ... "What about the fire-mark?" hahaha ... good one.

You just had to bump this again, didn't you? willing and I argued, yeah, but we had a sort of tacit agreement to let this deck rot, now that the argument was resolved.
Interesting sense of humor but no, I pretty much know for a fact that this deck is not a "hoax" because I've seen the 7wave guy boasting around on kongregate with nothing to show for it.

[Celidion]

I agree with Jangoo, that is all.

[7wavemaster]

lulz, FG's. Okay, now I know he's making a big joke out of it. For what purpose, I'm not sure.

To be completely honest: I am 99% sure that this thread and deck is a hoax.
(kinda like Outcasts (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,1068.0.html))

Especially when wavemaster stated he was a first-timer, while boasting an
incredible 150+ forum-posts I couldn't help but rofl all over the place.

I mean, come on people ... "speed"-rainbow? What the ...

My first time at making a speed rainbow lol.

[lava golem]

You're variant of speedbow fits controlbow more, not enough damage

[7wavemaster]

You're variant of speedbow fits controlbow more, not enough damage

Changed it into a growthbow.

[Dm]

This made my ROFL of the day.


Now, seriously. You are too heavy on fire quantum. It's a speed-bow, not a speed-graviton-fire-master-rush. You have deflags, fire spirits and graviton fire masters that use the fire quantum. The quantum distribution is poor, and I'm sorry to say you are missing a lot of quantum. Some cards fit, like the parasite, but have no use in the long run what-so-ever. To be blunt, I doubt you can make a decent speed bow without supernova. Quantum pillars would make this be a longer deck.


If it's a joke.. use my new fg farmer, 59 quantum pillars and 1 aether pillar. Tactic? Bore the FG to f***ing hell.