Anti-false God decks not as hard as you think!

[nongnocchien]

Deck Helper comment: 
This deck was posted before the 1.32 game update and as a result may work very differently now.  Use at your own risk.
To combat the current Anti-false God decks it really has a lot of ways.
I also want to share with everyone how they still use. But with 60 decks, but it is very effective. With this simple way you will save time relative to each game and often ended up with 100% HP ^ ^.

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u7 6u7 6u7 6u7 6u7 6u7 719 71b 71b 74b 74b 74e 77f 77f 7ah 7ba 7ba 7ba 7ba 7ba 7ba 7do 7dq 7gp 7gp 7q5 7q5 7q5 7t9 7t9 80d 80d 80d 80h 80h 80h 80h 8pj

This is a typical clip (quite early and easily won). ^ ^

You are all the "test" to draw comfort and experience what it should be interesting to share with everyone.
Thanks everyone for visiting this topic.

[Levgre]

It's an okay deck but not that good, sorry to say.

[yaladilae]

I like the fact you made a video

Very nice deck, but not necessary higher win rate then a good rainbow

Besides, bigger deck takes longer to play and are more prone to bad draw

Having said that, i still think its a solid deck

P.S there is a code button to post code

[avidteen13]

I saw the video.  You came close to losing that time.  What's the ratio of wins to losses on average for this deck?

[nongnocchien]

I found this game decks with FGS relatively light and fast again. Remains the most frequent winning HP 100%, also for the case had a "steal" and "Destroy decks" is relatively difficult to hit - The remaining cases are still very high rate of WIN.
Some pictures illustrate:

[nongnocchien]

I saw the video.  You came close to losing that time.  What's the ratio of wins to losses on average for this deck?

To win the "Rainbow False God" for Decks also have% (relatively low). If you're early, "Improved Antimatter" on your opponent's decks, the rate will increase to Win. Since its not much time to play games should not be able to test out the 100 game (For detailed statistics) everyone would understand ^ ^.

[Mashimaro]

well i see you are very heavy on control, which is not a bad thing against FG....but guess i'll still put it short and sweet:

3 hourglass in 60card deck???

[pervepic]

Nice to see that somebody also uses fat decks against gods . In my opinion these are complitely playable and can have normal results. Since somebody mentioned in chat that time-rainbows are underposted, I will show mine:

Code: [Select]

6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6u6 717 71b 71b 71c 74b 74b 77f 77i 77i 7do 7do 7gp 7n3 7q5 7q5 7q5 7q5 7q5 7q5 7q8 7q9 7q9 7q9 7q9 7q9 7q9 80d 80d 80d 80h 80h
Compared with the deck of this thread, there is not much originality, but it is tested for a long time and it works well. I also have short statistics about this deck i made recently:

http://img571.imageshack.us/img571/2867/newbitmapimage3r.png

I even didn't play particulary well these 100 games and made some noob's mistakes in winning positions (forgot about TU-s in games against Elidnis and Gemini). Although i met Neptune many times and this is certainly a part of the luck, I also was quite unlucky few times (decked out against Osiris because Eternity was my last card (!) and lost in winning game against Obliterator, because my PA which should have protected my Eternity, was last card). 100 games is not clearly enough for make conlusions, but I believe that the overall winning percentage of this deck is still somewhere 65-70. And the sad thing is that Dream Catcher is a real pain for fat decks

[Lluis83]

Nice to see that somebody also uses fat decks against gods . In my opinion these are complitely playable and can have normal results. Since somebody mentioned in chat that time-rainbows are underposted, I will show mine:

Code: [Select]

6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6u6 717 71b 71b 71c 74b 74b 77f 77i 77i 7do 7do 7gp 7n3 7q5 7q5 7q5 7q5 7q5 7q5 7q8 7q9 7q9 7q9 7q9 7q9 7q9 80d 80d 80d 80h 80h
Compared with the deck of this thread, there is not much originality, but it is tested for a long time and it works well. I also have short statistics about this deck i made recently:

http://img571.imageshack.us/img571/2867/newbitmapimage3r.png

I even didn't play particulary well these 100 games and made some noob's mistakes in winning positions (forgot about TU-s in games against Elidnis and Gemini). Although i met Neptune many times and this is certainly a part of the luck, I also was quite unlucky few times (decked out against Osiris because Eternity was my last card (!) and lost in winning game against Obliterator, because my PA which should have protected my Eternity, was last card). 100 games is not clearly enough for make conlusions, but I believe that the overall winning percentage of this deck is still somewhere 65-70. And the sad thing is that Dream Catcher is a real pain for fat decks



I play with Seravy's Rainbow, that is very similar to your deck and it's very consistent.

[nongnocchien]

Nice to see that somebody also uses fat decks against gods . In my opinion these are complitely playable and can have normal results. Since somebody mentioned in chat that time-rainbows are underposted, I will show mine:

Code: [Select]

6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6u6 717 71b 71b 71c 74b 74b 77f 77i 77i 7do 7do 7gp 7n3 7q5 7q5 7q5 7q5 7q5 7q5 7q8 7q9 7q9 7q9 7q9 7q9 7q9 80d 80d 80d 80h 80h
Compared with the deck of this thread, there is not much originality, but it is tested for a long time and it works well. I also have short statistics about this deck i made recently:

http://img571.imageshack.us/img571/2867/newbitmapimage3r.png

I even didn't play particulary well these 100 games and made some noob's mistakes in winning positions (forgot about TU-s in games against Elidnis and Gemini). Although i met Neptune many times and this is certainly a part of the luck, I also was quite unlucky few times (decked out against Osiris because Eternity was my last card (!) and lost in winning game against Obliterator, because my PA which should have protected my Eternity, was last card). 100 games is not clearly enough for make conlusions, but I believe that the overall winning percentage of this deck is still somewhere 65-70. And the sad thing is that Dream Catcher is a real pain for fat decks

Decks are mostly player initially, to attack the enemy decks are few possibilities to Win so soon is very low. I am still interested in efficiency than the match.

[Krahhl]

Would it be ok to use a nymph instead of all the antimatters? Or would that be a bad idea because creatures can be killed/nymph takes longer to set up?

[killsdazombies]

kinda fails vs harder fgs....