2 Cost, 1 SNova [elder]

[JayRT]

by JayRT

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

6ts 6ts 6ts 6tu 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 718 718 747 747 779 779 7ae 7ae 7ds 7ds 7gl 7gl 7jv 7jv 7q1 7q1 7t7 7tb 80k 80k 8pj

Any thoughts are welcome  .
PS: With the possible implementation of singularity in to the game, this deck is given the slight boost over higher costing speedbows.

[Mathematistic]

Where are the epinephrines?

That aside, you probably will have too much quanta left. You need some 4-cost midrangers (like phase recluse, abyss crawler).

[JayRT]

Where are the epinephrines?

That aside, you probably will have too much quanta left. You need some 4-cost midrangers (like phase recluse, abyss crawler).

The whole point of this deck is to consistently run of 1 or 2 SNova and its quanta should be perfectly right for your hand unless you start with 0 or 3+ SNova (which is not always likely), besides it makes a difference from your average speedbow.

[Chapuz]

Where are the epinephrines?

That aside, you probably will have too much quanta left. You need some 4-cost midrangers (like phase recluse, abyss crawler).

The whole point of this deck is to consistently run of 1 or 2 SNova and its quanta should be perfectly right for your hand unless you start with 0 or 3+ SNova (which is not always likely), besides it makes a difference from your average speedbow.

The fact is that you are going to draw 3+ supernovas, so there are gonna be some waste cards. 2 epis and 3 hourglasses instead of the quantum towers won't hurt it.

[JayRT]

Where are the epinephrines?

That aside, you probably will have too much quanta left. You need some 4-cost midrangers (like phase recluse, abyss crawler).

The whole point of this deck is to consistently run of 1 or 2 SNova and its quanta should be perfectly right for your hand unless you start with 0 or 3+ SNova (which is not always likely), besides it makes a difference from your average speedbow.

The fact is that you are going to draw 3+ supernovas, so there are gonna be some waste cards. 2 epis and 3 hourglasses instead of the quantum towers won't hurt it.

Yes, there is always a possibility of drawing 3+ Snova but not a very big one. Changing towers for epis is always an option, though imo it will reduce consistency. Hourglasses is not an option as precogs would be better as this deck intends to win in just a few turns.

[Chapuz]

Where are the epinephrines?

That aside, you probably will have too much quanta left. You need some 4-cost midrangers (like phase recluse, abyss crawler).

The whole point of this deck is to consistently run of 1 or 2 SNova and its quanta should be perfectly right for your hand unless you start with 0 or 3+ SNova (which is not always likely), besides it makes a difference from your average speedbow.

The fact is that you are going to draw 3+ supernovas, so there are gonna be some waste cards. 2 epis and 3PRECOGS instead of the quantum towers won't hurt it.

Yes, there is always a possibility of drawing 3+ Snova but not a very big one. Changing towers for epis is always an option, though imo it will reduce consistency. Hourglasses is not an option as precogs would be better as this deck intends to win in just a few turns.

CORRECTED, I meant precogs! xD
Not the towers, the frogs. I meant to change the frogs for epis and the towers for precogs

[JayRT]

Where are the epinephrines?

That aside, you probably will have too much quanta left. You need some 4-cost midrangers (like phase recluse, abyss crawler).

The whole point of this deck is to consistently run of 1 or 2 SNova and its quanta should be perfectly right for your hand unless you start with 0 or 3+ SNova (which is not always likely), besides it makes a difference from your average speedbow.

The fact is that you are going to draw 3+ supernovas, so there are gonna be some waste cards. 2 epis and 3PRECOGS instead of the quantum towers won't hurt it.

Yes, there is always a possibility of drawing 3+ Snova but not a very big one. Changing towers for epis is always an option, though imo it will reduce consistency. Hourglasses is not an option as precogs would be better as this deck intends to win in just a few turns.

CORRECTED, I meant precogs! xD
Not the towers, the frogs. I meant to change the frogs for epis and the towers for precogs

I suppose those suggestions could work, its just a matter of opinion .

[BluePriest]

I like it. While almost all other supernovas rely on getting a few supernovas (usually 3) to play all the cards, this 1 only relies on getting 2, and all of the creatures can be used with just 1 so you know the instant you get the quanta for supernova, you can play monsters. It increases the initial speed of the deck by a good amount without requiring lucky draws for that 3 turn win to bring down the ttw for when it performs average.

[Calindu]

I like it. While almost all other supernovas rely on getting a few supernovas (usually 3) to play all the cards, this 1 only relies on getting 2, and all of the creatures can be used with just 1 so you know the instant you get the quanta for supernova, you can play monsters. It increases the initial speed of the deck by a good amount without requiring lucky draws for that 3 turn win to bring down the ttw for when it performs average.

So much this.
Also what about a CP instead of that micro abom, on usual RNG, it performs better.

[JayRT]

Also what about a CP instead of that micro abom, on usual RNG, it performs better.

Good idea, that should be taken into consideration.

[Mathematistic]

I like it. While almost all other supernovas rely on getting a few supernovas (usually 3) to play all the cards, this 1 only relies on getting 2, and all of the creatures can be used with just 1 so you know the instant you get the quanta for supernova, you can play monsters. It increases the initial speed of the deck by a good amount without requiring lucky draws for that 3 turn win to bring down the ttw for when it performs average.

Which agrees with 4-quanta midrangers...

[BluePriest]

I like it. While almost all other supernovas rely on getting a few supernovas (usually 3) to play all the cards, this 1 only relies on getting 2, and all of the creatures can be used with just 1 so you know the instant you get the quanta for supernova, you can play monsters. It increases the initial speed of the deck by a good amount without requiring lucky draws for that 3 turn win to bring down the ttw for when it performs average.

Which agrees with 4-quanta midrangers...

... no.
12 elements
6 SN
3 Towers
That means 21 cards.
Where are the other 9 cards you need?
This deck relies on being able to play ANY 1 ELEMENT with just 1 supernova out. Meanwhile, it also has control and survivability (the buffs, dagger and bloodsucker).

It relies on more consistency of being able to play creatures immidiately, which you cant guarentee when you have 4 cost creatures. Its a DIFFERENT STYLE.
Why is that such a difficult concept for people?