*Author

Offline TheForbiddenOracle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1789
  • Country: cn
  • Reputation Power: 21
  • TheForbiddenOracle is a Mummy waiting to discover the path to glory.TheForbiddenOracle is a Mummy waiting to discover the path to glory.TheForbiddenOracle is a Mummy waiting to discover the path to glory.TheForbiddenOracle is a Mummy waiting to discover the path to glory.
  • Awards: Weekly Tournament WinnerWeekly Tournament WinnerSlice of Elements 2nd Birthday Cake
Re: (1.27) CC? Why Bother? - unupped https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=23978.msg318855#msg318855
« Reply #24 on: April 24, 2011, 02:48:07 pm »
After trying this out...

-Antimatter is really unreliable without a mark of entropy
-2 shields in a 39 card deck does not work, shrink it down or add another shield (Mirror doesn't work because it reduces  damage unupped, perhaps a solar shield
-many times EAs just sit in my hand not doing anything, and they take up valuable space

nhan1st

  • Guest
Re: (1.27) CC? Why Bother? - unupped https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=23978.msg320814#msg320814
« Reply #25 on: April 27, 2011, 12:54:42 am »
Sanctuary Helps out a lot. Thinking of making one since I saw a few mods of this in T50.

kirchj33

  • Guest
Re: (1.27) CC? Why Bother? - unupped https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=23978.msg320831#msg320831
« Reply #26 on: April 27, 2011, 01:14:54 am »
-Antimatter is really unreliable without a mark of entropy
Completely agree, problem is, they are such a gamebreaker vs. FGs.  For this reason, I would probably keep the AMs because they are invaluable vs. most FG's once you hit that 8  :entropy mark.  Maybe -1 AM and add another miracle?  (Synergizes well with the proposed solar shield)

and on that note....

-2 shields in a 39 card deck does not work, shrink it down or add another shield (Mirror doesn't work because it reduces  damage unupped, perhaps a solar shield
-many times EAs just sit in my hand not doing anything, and they take up valuable space
-I agree it needs a 3rd shield, and slimmed down; however, its an unupped FG deck, and is limited as such.  Also, unupped shields are so aweful.  I'll ponder this...
-I do think the EAs could probably get dropped, I think they need to go in order to slim this down, however, with the new FG's, I feel they are superior in the upped version.

The new proposed deck would look like this (slimmed down to 36 cards):

Code: [Select]
4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4vn 4vn 58v 58v 5fa 5fa 5i9 5i9 5li 5lm 5lm 5lm 5lm 5lm 5lm 5oj 5rl 5rl 5rl 621 621 623
Edit: Just remembered Solar Shield doesn't synergize with sancts, back to the shield drawing board.  -1 solar shield, -1 miracle

nhan1st

  • Guest
Re: (1.27) CC? Why Bother? - unupped https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=23978.msg321582#msg321582
« Reply #27 on: April 28, 2011, 01:23:43 am »
So, I've been playing with this deck in my real account (blew all my electrums and upped cards for this deck)
It works well enough against FG, but the problem I find is that it's too slow or a bad hand can result in a loss against an
easy should win FG. I guess this is mostly because I don't have the second pulvy, but sometimes I find dropping
an Ice shield or Antimatter too slow as quanta is limited in the first few turns.

This is how my deck looks like. Been farming T50 for another Puly but no luck so far.... I always get a Titan instead of Puly ):
Hover over cards for details, click for permalink
Deck import code : [Select]
592 592 5lm 5lm 5lm 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6rn 6rn 6rn 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u7 6u7 77f 7dq 7dq 7gp 7gp 7n3 7q5 7q5 7q5 80h 80h 8pj


The ignore the question mark for the last card as my deck is a 334 card deck and the mark is entropy.

willng3:  I added your edit to your original post.  Next time, use the Modify button at the top right of your post instead of double-posting.  Thank you.

Offline Djhopper :)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 559
  • Reputation Power: 7
  • Djhopper :) is a Spark waiting for a buff.
  • New to Elements
Re: (1.27) CC? Why Bother? - unupped https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=23978.msg322556#msg322556
« Reply #28 on: April 29, 2011, 01:36:16 pm »
This deck is awesome!

So far I have ~40% win-rate... With a fully-unupped deck!

Thank you soooo much.

Ps: I'm playing it -1 PA, -1 Miracle, -1 mind-gate, +3 pillars.

Offline Rainbowninja

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 183
  • Reputation Power: 3
  • Rainbowninja is a Spark waiting for a buff.
  • Relatively New to Elements
Re: (1.27) CC? Why Bother? - unupped https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=23978.msg323581#msg323581
« Reply #29 on: April 30, 2011, 06:41:05 pm »
If someone could make a god-by-god breakdown...enough said.
:rainbow ninja

"Pain is weakness leaving the body"

Offline siriosirio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1187
  • Country: ch
  • Reputation Power: 13
  • siriosirio is taking their first peeks out of the Antlion's burrow.siriosirio is taking their first peeks out of the Antlion's burrow.
  • tonight
  • Awards: Slice of Elements 8th Birthday CakeSlice of Elements 7th Birthday CakeSlice of Elements 6th Birthday CakeSlice of Elements 5th Birthday CakeSlice of Elements 4th Birthday CakeSlice of Elements 3rd Birthday CakeSlice of Elements 2nd Birthday Cake
Re: (1.27) CC? Why Bother? - unupped https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=23978.msg323646#msg323646
« Reply #30 on: April 30, 2011, 07:45:14 pm »
So, I've been playing with this deck in my real account (blew all my electrums and upped cards for this deck)
It works well enough against FG, but the problem I find is that it's too slow or a bad hand can result in a loss against an
easy should win FG. I guess this is mostly because I don't have the second pulvy, but sometimes I find dropping
an Ice shield or Antimatter too slow as quanta is limited in the first few turns.

This is how my deck looks like. Been farming T50 for another Puly but no luck so far.... I always get a Titan instead of Puly ):
Hover over cards for details, click for permalink
Deck import code : [Select]
592 592 5lm 5lm 5lm 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6rn 6rn 6rn 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u7 6u7 77f 7dq 7dq 7gp 7gp 7n3 7q5 7q5 7q5 80h 80h 8pj


The ignore the question mark for the last card as my deck is a 334 card deck and the mark is entropy.

willng3:  I added your edit to your original post.  Next time, use the Modify button at the top right of your post instead of double-posting.  Thank you.
the last card "? ? ?" is the entropy code delet the "8pj" from import code and write entropy at place of MARK  (deck mark=MARK )  ;) than it have to be ok

Offline Rainbowninja

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 183
  • Reputation Power: 3
  • Rainbowninja is a Spark waiting for a buff.
  • Relatively New to Elements
Re: (1.27) CC? Why Bother? - unupped https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=23978.msg323703#msg323703
« Reply #31 on: April 30, 2011, 08:53:45 pm »
Does anyone know if there are any pulvy farms out there? If not could one be made.
:rainbow ninja

"Pain is weakness leaving the body"

Offline siriosirio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1187
  • Country: ch
  • Reputation Power: 13
  • siriosirio is taking their first peeks out of the Antlion's burrow.siriosirio is taking their first peeks out of the Antlion's burrow.
  • tonight
  • Awards: Slice of Elements 8th Birthday CakeSlice of Elements 7th Birthday CakeSlice of Elements 6th Birthday CakeSlice of Elements 5th Birthday CakeSlice of Elements 4th Birthday CakeSlice of Elements 3rd Birthday CakeSlice of Elements 2nd Birthday Cake
Re: (1.27) CC? Why Bother? - unupped https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=23978.msg323707#msg323707
« Reply #32 on: April 30, 2011, 08:58:16 pm »
look at T50 section they have some peopel that acept request for FD. pulverizer is 1 of the rare that many peopel ask for  ;)

nhan1st

  • Guest
Re: (1.27) CC? Why Bother? - unupped https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=23978.msg323886#msg323886
« Reply #33 on: May 01, 2011, 01:30:09 am »
Finally got my Pulvy. Thanks a lot for the biting farm Donot XD. Playing Skeret right now. Btw, should I add a miracle to my deck?
It seems an upped FFQ won't help with light quanta, and I'm not sure if a 9 aether quanta costing fractal would make this deck fast or slow.

Edit: God by God breakdown would be much appreciated, thanks.

kirchj33

  • Guest
Re: (1.27) CC? Why Bother? - unupped https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=23978.msg323930#msg323930
« Reply #34 on: May 01, 2011, 02:55:35 am »
Edit: God by God breakdown would be much appreciated, thanks.
If someone could make a god-by-god breakdown...enough said.
I would attempt to create a god-by-god breakdown, however, I think it would be almost identical to the upped version in terms of strategy.  From a statistical standpoint, there should be extensive research done in conjunction with a false god study soon to be unveiled by Jangoo and I.  Numbers should be available within the next week or two.

If people are in need of miracles and pulvies, I will try and keep them in my T50 farm whenever I'm not online for the next few weeks.

Offline Rainbowninja

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 183
  • Reputation Power: 3
  • Rainbowninja is a Spark waiting for a buff.
  • Relatively New to Elements
Re: (1.27) CC? Why Bother? - unupped https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=23978.msg323944#msg323944
« Reply #35 on: May 01, 2011, 03:09:57 am »
Miracles especially needed. Thanks again to Donot for the pulvys.
:rainbow ninja

"Pain is weakness leaving the body"

 

blarg: nhan1st,siriosirio