(1.24) CC? Why bother?

[wavedash]

Well, your playstyle is just like that then. And when the shield comes one turn too late, you knock yourself after realizing you could've survived that extra turn if you hadn't taken the damage from cells.

I'm not saying it's a bad risk to take, I'm just pointing out that it exists so people can adjust according to personal preference.

I've gotten killed by Malignant Cells countless times. I've also just barely been able to negate a God's damage through Aflatoxin with a shield and SoGs, just barely beat out Scorpio's poison, just barely beat out Osiris's Scarab production. It's a gray area, IMO.

[Jappert]

Has anyone tried CCYB with Mitosis yet? I can see it replacing fractal, but I don't know if the deck can sustain enough quanta for mitosis to keep reproducing.

Also, both creatures in CCYB kinda need their skill to be any good.... My guess is it's no good match.


**Edit** Mithosis--> Mitosis 

[wavedash]

What the hell is Mithosis?

EDIT: Oh, Mitosis, nevermind

[Krahhl]

Yeah you don't want to sacrifice the growth ability of one lava destroyer just so it can create others... fractal does a better job of that. It's also important to keep the suddenness of fractal, being able to suddenly drop many creatures in one turn in case you need to get past miracle. Mitosis is slower, and you can't burst-play them.

[TheIdioticIdiot]

Has anyone tried CCYB with Mitosis yet? I can see it replacing fractal, but I don't know if the deck can sustain enough quanta for mitosis to keep reproducing.

Also, both creatures in CCYB kinda need their skill to be any good.... My guess is it's no good match.


**Edit** Mithosis--> Mitosis 

hey, look, it's my old pal, jappert
as for mitosis in this particular FG deck, well, it's not that good... growth on lava destroyers is better... and FFQ is a ton better with its original ability.. 

[TheForbiddenOracle]

Fractal>Mitosis for CCYB. How else would you get past the Miracle spamming?

[lukce]

Osiris is medium, once he has catapult.

[diocane]

I've try this deck a bit and I'm not sure it's so good as its fame.

1) Many times there's a lack of quanta

2) Some FG called 'easy' are not, think at Fire queen, you need 4 cards for win. Usually when they are out you are probably almost out of card in the deck.

3) The deck is VERY slow and FG are fast so while you wait your cards, or pray for time quanta, FG already has a small army and SoG are not enought.

4) It's enought a stupid creature with Butterfly for completely Fxxk you.

So those are some reasons that have made me doubt about the affidability of this deck.

Probably I'm a bit unlucky but in 107 games I've played everything I needed for win the FG was for 80% of the time six, seven cards before the end of the deck... and that's, in most of the case, not enought for lower 200 HP.

IF i should vote for the best FG deck my vote wouldn't go here.
Probably was good in the past not nowadays.

I'll try RoL/Hope.

[Jappert]

You do know you need to time fractal nukes right?....

Also it's not slow, but everyone is entitled an opinion I guess.

[bruce 1337]

I've try this deck a bit and I'm not sure it's so good as its fame.

1) Many times there's a lack of quanta

2) Some FG called 'easy' are not, think at Fire queen, you need 4 cards for win. Usually when they are out you are probably almost out of card in the deck.

3) The deck is VERY slow and FG are fast so while you wait your cards, or pray for time quanta, FG already has a small army and SoG are not enought.

4) It's enought a stupid creature with Butterfly for completely Fxxk you.

So those are some reasons that have made me doubt about the affidability of this deck.

Probably I'm a bit unlucky but in 107 games I've played everything I needed for win the FG was for 80% of the time six, seven cards before the end of the deck... and that's, in most of the case, not enought for lower 200 HP.

IF i should vote for the best FG deck my vote wouldn't go here.
Probably was good in the past not nowadays.

I'll try RoL/Hope.

Weird... I have much higher win rate nowadays. Maybe you just need to learn how to use this deck better or make a modifications that fit your play style

[TheIdioticIdiot]

I've try this deck a bit and I'm not sure it's so good as its fame.

1) Many times there's a lack of quanta

2) Some FG called 'easy' are not, think at Fire queen, you need 4 cards for win. Usually when they are out you are probably almost out of card in the deck.

3) The deck is VERY slow and FG are fast so while you wait your cards, or pray for time quanta, FG already has a small army and SoG are not enought.

4) It's enought a stupid creature with Butterfly for completely Fxxk you.

So those are some reasons that have made me doubt about the affidability of this deck.

Probably I'm a bit unlucky but in 107 games I've played everything I needed for win the FG was for 80% of the time six, seven cards before the end of the deck... and that's, in most of the case, not enought for lower 200 HP.

IF i should vote for the best FG deck my vote wouldn't go here.
Probably was good in the past not nowadays.

I'll try RoL/Hope.

1) due to this being an entropy bow, you shouldn't have quanta problems...
2) no FG is ever easy.. remember that always...
3) This is one of the fastest anti-FG deck... almost all FG decks are slow, if not slower... RoL/hope and voodoo decks are the fastest, this is the second fastest...
4) Only Dream Catcher has Butterfly Effect

[Newbiecake]

I don't want to go through the 80 some pages of text I haven't read yet, so let me ask: Air Nymth is replaceable for FFQ right? Do I have to make any adjustments besides the exchange of Air Nymth of FFQ?