(1.24) CC? Why bother?

[Krahhl]

This is basically the same as my deck with -1 tower, supernova, miracle, hourglass, and quintessence.

Gases are good damage if you have the quanta to make them, but most of the time the destroyers will do sufficient damage at the end of the game.

What I find UGs really useful for is achieving EMs, since you can just leave one or two unexploded if you need an extra turn to line it up so that pulverizer gets the last hit. They even work as creature control (saved me more than once against Gemini by killing his momentumed spiders before he could TU spam them).

All the gods that use a reflective shield are relatively easy anyway, as long as you survive the initial rush. So destroyers won't have a hard time growing to big damage.

[Fallower]

CC W/ Nymphs:

Code: [Select]

6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u7 6u7 71c 77f 77f 7ak 7dq 7dq 7gp 7gp 7ng 7q5 7q5 7q5 7to 80h 80h 80h
Anyone care to test this out for me if you have the nymphs? :3

[rotface]

u think that having death nymph in for aflaxtions and blue nymph for ugs would work out ok   ? i know the blue nymph does what about the  death though i have light turqoise and red to if they would work whats best

[kintar]

CC W/ Nymphs:

Code: [Select]

6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u7 6u7 71c 77f 77f 7ak 7dq 7dq 7gp 7gp 7ng 7q5 7q5 7q5 7to 80h 80h 80h
Anyone care to test this out for me if you have the nymphs? :3

I have the nymphs.  But can you explain why there's a dark nymph?

[Fallower]

You dont need more than one alfatoxin.
So the death nymph won't work well.

Dark nymph: extra CC and lobo, letting antimatter do damage, extra damage since its attack is pretty high.

[Nume]

I wouldnt recommend the dark nymph unless you also include the purple one, as the cost and/or needing a quint really wouldnt be worth it for just 2 AM'd dmg dealers and possibly loboing a few small creatures, which you couldnt do till quite late due to quanta cost so would also be quite useless. That combo doesnt really work that great period in this deck imo bc of the quanta issues, but yeah. The spell is just better than the dark nymph in most cases in this deck.

[Belthus]

Any1 thought about dune scorpion? Maybe it could replace a destroyer. Many FGs play cards fast, so if its played early, it could be very useful, if you got it in late game you usually have a destro out already. Problem can be the it requires some atk buff, so you have to wait for 3 cards ( scorpi, some atk buff and quint).

Late, I know, but anyway ...

I added an upgraded Forest Scorpion (called just plain Scorpion), and it works well with Fractal. Several in play at once raise the poison counter quickly. It's a nice way to get extra damage when you have a slow start.

[Fallower]

o.o Forest scorpion?
I guess its useful if you use fractal, but won't it die early or waste one of your quints?

Zsotti was talking about Dune scorpions, but there are no cards which boost attack in the deck...

[Ryli]

or waste one of your quints?

There no need to quint a Scorpion. If you fractal it there will be a ton of them to deal with, and as far as I'm aware Fire Buckler is the only FG card that can deal with them on that scale, by which point the Scorpion has done alot to their hp and stacked loads of poison.

[Fallower]

I don't use fractal, and you've usually already won by the time you use fractal anyway.

[slobad121]

First, thanks for the deck it is great.  I particularly like gaining score while farming due to the fact that ROL/HOPE just doesn't get you that score.

I also love the math needed to pick off the EM's I am not sure everyone is geeky enough to do this but this deck would do JMDT proud as an EM deck.

 

[132jh]

so werw supposed to replace the one fractal with a mindgate???