*Author

Active members:
killfer8(1) Belthazar666(1) karthikking(1) Scaredgirl(1) Retribution(1) GG(1) Essence(1) Rastafla(1) xuru(1) Apocalypticmosh(1) UsernameLife(1) savag3blow(1) Drobbit(1) rex13hk(1) BurnOne(1) mrkeki(1) Clipse(1) KhaosKind(1) hrmmm(1) jplar523(1) Myztyrio(1) mac10289(1) Lluis83(1) glennert(1) RedWarrior0(1) Mntoothpick(1) Djhopper :)(1) Sengiratolom(1) Cloudstorm2(1) padewan09(1) pandoras_box(1) MrJ0shua(1) IKronozI(1) THE DARG(1) JChace029(1) teffy(1) Phdinpain(1) Klaymore(1) slobad121(1) 132jh(1) Tarutao(1) Nadrin(1) toriii13(1) Hotshot2k4(1) Nervontuxis(1) Panurge(1) Katarsis(1) TheMartyr24(1) YeliyaYue(1) Sage880(1) Kamietsu(1) zhen_rogue(1) Colossus(1) thatnewguy(1) joaopcl(1) stereosound(1) octonus(1) nerd1(1) lokiburn4(1) einish(1) dirktheone(1) takezoido(1) Soularmadyl(1) Tea is good(1) Zerker(1) 3RIFECI(1) grindpower(1) kakakaak(1) lukce(1) gavsword(1) rakankrad(1) Spherical(1) primarycolors(1) Heavyweight(1) YawnChainHow(1) Isei(1) Tymalous(1) Camoninja(1) Xylo(1) Tiko(1) Drakow(1) nhan1st(1) UTAlan(1) Metahater(1) thehairykiwi(1) cyanspirit(1) Sylved(1) Toenail(1) MorriNZ(1) Thiefboy109(1) k3e3(1) Gwill(1) Ryanthehood(1) guy_fawkes(2) implosion(2) BadBoyK(2) kev(2) killsdazombies(2) nilsieboy(2) fnix(2) Vineroz(2) proman1355(2) xdude(2) Artois(2) xKelevra(2) bigbadbanana(2) Mastermind79(2) yeasy(2) andy80528052(2) Zsotti(2) venumuse(2) jc14(2) The Emperor(2) Clathius(2) Amnesiac(2) Shruggy(2) Belthus(2) Mithcairion(2) 9jacob4(2) Blues(2) RootRanger(2) quantik(2) funplay(2) diocane(2) Cobra(2) darkfrogger(2) kirchj33(2) MeetJSquared(2) digitalevil1(2) Baily18(3) trozman(3) Dragoon(3) Xoned(3) bojengles77(3) thraexis11(3) bluemilk(3) catalyzeme(3) zombie0(3) Malignant(3) coldfusion(3) Hodari(3) Malebolgia(3) Celidion(3) ZeGuitarist(3) ArtCrusade(3) leoyanwaiting(3) Kjaska(3) Bonestorm(3) siriosirio(3) Jangoo(3) Time_lord_victorius(3) Elementalicious(3) daccoo(3) the_unknown(3) Amilir(4) asymmetry(4) Terroking(4) WakSkylicker(4) P-e-K(4) timtwins(4) geekz_always_win(4) xn0ize(4) PlayerOa(4) Chapuz(4) PaulWog(4) lava golem(5) PuppyChow(5) Bender74d(5) burne(5) Kurohami(5) MYF(5) Kuross(5) Tuntor(5) Avenger(6) jumpoffduck(6) LootPinata(6) Xelax(6) BatCountry(6) JotS3(7) Egarran(7) ddevans96(7) Zubon(7) pikachufan2164(7) omegareaper7(7) bruce 1337(7) kintar(8) stinky472(8) Svenningen(8) morningstar(8) wushu(8) Mahon(8) genraenera(9) tinkady(9) frlaa(9) finkel(10) miniwally(10) RavingRabbid(10) bucky1andonly(10) Seph454(11) Dragoon1140(11) Ifailgood(11) Noobiecakes(11) rotface(12) Averam(12) Krahhl(13) hermantheowl(14) gocubbies1212(14) jmdt(15) 7_Deadly_Sins(16) JJ 52(16) Jappert(17) $$$man(20) MrBlonde(21) Fallower(22) sSethia(23) tyranim(24) wavedash(32) tttt(32) CB!(33) guolin(41) TheForbiddenOracle(41) josh223123(42) TheIdioticIdiot(47) kobisjeruk(49) TheOwner(66) Nume(106)

coldfusion

  • Guest
Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=9545.msg149686#msg149686
« Reply #660 on: August 31, 2010, 09:38:59 pm »
I made slight modifications to this deck. Tell me what you guys think. I tried to focus the modifications to beat certain FGs with particular weaknesses to certain cards.

Code: [Select]
6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u7 6u7 71c 77f 77f 77i 7dq 7dq 7gp 7gp 7gp 7gq 7k2 7n3 7q5 7q5 7q5 80h 80h 80i
Main point to note is the mark is water. I am always finding that I lack water quanta for the critical shield. I also added another permafrost to remedy this problem.

The addition of PA and purify was originally designed to beat seism and scorpio. The new purify means it is slightly useful even if the FG has no poison which is nice. The PA is useful against a variety of gods other than seism by protecting the shield (or occationally the weapon). Quinted destroyer + protected permafrost = dead Decay.

However, the extra bulk decreases speed and quanta generation is becoming a slight issue. Lack of entropy quanta makes supernovas much less useful so I swapped 3 out for pillars. It helps against decking out but the speed is a slight issue against rush gods.

guolin

  • Guest
Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=9545.msg149695#msg149695
« Reply #661 on: August 31, 2010, 09:47:17 pm »
I made slight modifications to this deck. Tell me what you guys think. I tried to focus the modifications to beat certain FGs with particular weaknesses to certain cards.

Code: [Select]
6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u7 6u7 71c 77f 77f 77i 7dq 7dq 7gp 7gp 7gp 7gq 7k2 7n3 7q5 7q5 7q5 80h 80h 80i
Main point to note is the mark is water. I am always finding that I lack water quanta for the critical shield. I also added another permafrost to remedy this problem.

The addition of PA and purify was originally designed to beat seism and scorpio. The new purify means it is slightly useful even if the FG has no poison which is nice. The PA is useful against a variety of gods other than seism by protecting the shield (or occationally the weapon). Quinted destroyer + protected permafrost = dead Decay.

However, the extra bulk decreases speed and quanta generation is becoming a slight issue. Lack of entropy quanta makes supernovas much less useful so I swapped 3 out for pillars. It helps against decking out but the speed is a slight issue against rush gods.
I don't like the Mark of Water in this deck at all. Getting the Permafrost out has never been a problem for me. Also, CCYB can attribute a lot of its success to its small size.

Offline tyranim

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2877
  • Reputation Power: 34
  • tyranim is a Ghost, obsessed with their Elemental pursuits.tyranim is a Ghost, obsessed with their Elemental pursuits.tyranim is a Ghost, obsessed with their Elemental pursuits.tyranim is a Ghost, obsessed with their Elemental pursuits.tyranim is a Ghost, obsessed with their Elemental pursuits.tyranim is a Ghost, obsessed with their Elemental pursuits.
  • formerly unit
Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=9545.msg149895#msg149895
« Reply #662 on: September 01, 2010, 01:20:46 am »
i just THRASHED rainbow.
he didnt even use a single super nova. it was great, i had a pulvy very early in the game. so i just kept taking out his pillars, he eventually got enough quanta to play a super nova, but played a lycan instead. it was hillarious. i guess i got very lucky. unfortunatley, i didnt win anything in the spins

(http://imageplay.net/view/m7Gbd83951/rainbow_murder)
my milkshake brings all the boys to the yard and they're like "its better than yours" damn right, its better than yours! i can teach you but i'd have to charge!

$$$man

  • Guest
Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=9545.msg149898#msg149898
« Reply #663 on: September 01, 2010, 01:22:35 am »
i just THRASHED rainbow.
he didnt even use a single super nova. it was great, i had a pulvy very early in the game. so i just kept taking out his pillars, he eventually got enough quanta to play a super nova, but played a lycan instead. it was hillarious. i guess i got very lucky. unfortunatley, i didnt win anything in the spins

(http://imageplay.net/view/m7Gbd83951/rainbow_murder)
You realize he doesn't have supernovas, Right? :P

Offline Dragoon1140

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1984
  • Reputation Power: 23
  • Dragoon1140 is a Mummy waiting to discover the path to glory.Dragoon1140 is a Mummy waiting to discover the path to glory.Dragoon1140 is a Mummy waiting to discover the path to glory.Dragoon1140 is a Mummy waiting to discover the path to glory.
  • New to Elements
Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=9545.msg149905#msg149905
« Reply #664 on: September 01, 2010, 01:30:12 am »
i just THRASHED rainbow.
he didnt even use a single super nova. it was great, i had a pulvy very early in the game. so i just kept taking out his pillars, he eventually got enough quanta to play a super nova, but played a lycan instead. it was hillarious. i guess i got very lucky. unfortunatley, i didnt win anything in the spins

(http://imageplay.net/view/m7Gbd83951/rainbow_murder)
You realize he doesn't have supernovas, Right? :P
I'm sorry, but I have to say it.

OWNED!!!

Anyway, congrats nonetheless Unit.
Else known as "JonTheBon"

I also make videos and stuff.

Offline TheOwner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 833
  • Reputation Power: 10
  • TheOwner is taking their first peeks out of the Antlion's burrow.TheOwner is taking their first peeks out of the Antlion's burrow.
  • New to Elements
Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=9545.msg149910#msg149910
« Reply #665 on: September 01, 2010, 01:32:53 am »
i just THRASHED rainbow.
he didnt even use a single super nova. it was great, i had a pulvy very early in the game. so i just kept taking out his pillars, he eventually got enough quanta to play a super nova, but played a lycan instead. it was hillarious. i guess i got very lucky. unfortunatley, i didnt win anything in the spins

(http://imageplay.net/view/m7Gbd83951/rainbow_murder)
You realize he doesn't have supernovas, Right? :P
I'm sorry, but I have to say it.

OWNED!!!

Anyway, congrats nonetheless Unit.
OWNED!!! Is my thing... $$$man why'd you delete that post?  I started reading it my computer glitched so I refreshed and it wasn't there.

$$$man

  • Guest
Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=9545.msg149912#msg149912
« Reply #666 on: September 01, 2010, 01:34:17 am »
i just THRASHED rainbow.
he didnt even use a single super nova. it was great, i had a pulvy very early in the game. so i just kept taking out his pillars, he eventually got enough quanta to play a super nova, but played a lycan instead. it was hillarious. i guess i got very lucky. unfortunatley, i didnt win anything in the spins

(http://imageplay.net/view/m7Gbd83951/rainbow_murder)
You realize he doesn't have supernovas, Right? :P
I'm sorry, but I have to say it.

OWNED!!!

Anyway, congrats nonetheless Unit.
OWNED!!! Is my thing... $$$man why'd you delete that post?  I started reading it my computer glitched so I refreshed and it wasn't there.
Cuz it was my reading fail it said.
Quote from: $$$'s Reading fail.
Lawls you screwed up the quotes.

Offline tyranim

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2877
  • Reputation Power: 34
  • tyranim is a Ghost, obsessed with their Elemental pursuits.tyranim is a Ghost, obsessed with their Elemental pursuits.tyranim is a Ghost, obsessed with their Elemental pursuits.tyranim is a Ghost, obsessed with their Elemental pursuits.tyranim is a Ghost, obsessed with their Elemental pursuits.tyranim is a Ghost, obsessed with their Elemental pursuits.
  • formerly unit
Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=9545.msg149924#msg149924
« Reply #667 on: September 01, 2010, 01:55:32 am »
why doesnt rainbow have any super novas? it seems like they would be very helpful to him. oh well, it was funny nonetheless
my milkshake brings all the boys to the yard and they're like "its better than yours" damn right, its better than yours! i can teach you but i'd have to charge!

coldfusion

  • Guest
Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=9545.msg150247#msg150247
« Reply #668 on: September 01, 2010, 07:29:07 pm »
I made slight modifications to this deck. Tell me what you guys think. I tried to focus the modifications to beat certain FGs with particular weaknesses to certain cards.

Code: [Select]
6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u7 6u7 71c 77f 77f 77i 7dq 7dq 7gp 7gp 7gp 7gq 7k2 7n3 7q5 7q5 7q5 80h 80h 80i
Main point to note is the mark is water. I am always finding that I lack water quanta for the critical shield. I also added another permafrost to remedy this problem.

The addition of PA and purify was originally designed to beat seism and scorpio. The new purify means it is slightly useful even if the FG has no poison which is nice. The PA is useful against a variety of gods other than seism by protecting the shield (or occationally the weapon). Quinted destroyer + protected permafrost = dead Decay.

However, the extra bulk decreases speed and quanta generation is becoming a slight issue. Lack of entropy quanta makes supernovas much less useful so I swapped 3 out for pillars. It helps against decking out but the speed is a slight issue against rush gods.
I don't like the Mark of Water in this deck at all. Getting the Permafrost out has never been a problem for me. Also, CCYB can attribute a lot of its success to its small size.
Really? I was always finding it difficult to get shield out. The shield is the lifeline of this deck, it's the only thing keeping you alive while you try to grow a quinted destroyer. Supernova is nice but it's just not enough and after its used I find myself with as many pillars as I started with (usually 1 or 2) in endgame and quanta generation isn't high enough. Have you tried this deck out in the trainer?

Offline TheOwner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 833
  • Reputation Power: 10
  • TheOwner is taking their first peeks out of the Antlion's burrow.TheOwner is taking their first peeks out of the Antlion's burrow.
  • New to Elements
Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=9545.msg150263#msg150263
« Reply #669 on: September 01, 2010, 07:41:55 pm »
I made slight modifications to this deck. Tell me what you guys think. I tried to focus the modifications to beat certain FGs with particular weaknesses to certain cards.

Code: [Select]
6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u7 6u7 71c 77f 77f 77i 7dq 7dq 7gp 7gp 7gp 7gq 7k2 7n3 7q5 7q5 7q5 80h 80h 80i
Main point to note is the mark is water. I am always finding that I lack water quanta for the critical shield. I also added another permafrost to remedy this problem.

The addition of PA and purify was originally designed to beat seism and scorpio. The new purify means it is slightly useful even if the FG has no poison which is nice. The PA is useful against a variety of gods other than seism by protecting the shield (or occationally the weapon). Quinted destroyer + protected permafrost = dead Decay.

However, the extra bulk decreases speed and quanta generation is becoming a slight issue. Lack of entropy quanta makes supernovas much less useful so I swapped 3 out for pillars. It helps against decking out but the speed is a slight issue against rush gods.
I don't like the Mark of Water in this deck at all. Getting the Permafrost out has never been a problem for me. Also, CCYB can attribute a lot of its success to its small size.
Really? I was always finding it difficult to get shield out. The shield is the lifeline of this deck, it's the only thing keeping you alive while you try to grow a quinted destroyer. Supernova is nice but it's just not enough and after its used I find myself with as many pillars as I started with (usually 1 or 2) in endgame and quanta generation isn't high enough. Have you tried this deck out in the trainer?
Really...  You only need 2 Shields.  I suggest making one a Jade Shield.

Averam

  • Guest
Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=9545.msg151454#msg151454
« Reply #670 on: September 03, 2010, 06:24:44 pm »
I am relatively new to this game, I decided to start investing into this deck for farming False gods and generating some revenue. I have had some success with it so far, and my deck is mostly unupped, though I have started upgrading it slowly.

My question is this, given my circumstances, which cards of the deck would you upgrade first in order to increase the win % the most? I started with supernova and the quantum towers because without them quanta generation was way too slow, and they are generic enough i can use them in other decks too. Was this a good idea? what should I aim for next? I also already have 2 upgraded hourglasses, 6 upped shards, and an upgraded pulverizer I won from obliterator.

kobisjeruk

  • Guest
Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=9545.msg151467#msg151467
« Reply #671 on: September 03, 2010, 07:35:09 pm »
depends on what variant you're using
why dont you post your actual decklist so that we know exactly what you have unupped/upgraded?

 

blarg: