*Author

Active members:
killfer8(1) Belthazar666(1) karthikking(1) Scaredgirl(1) Retribution(1) GG(1) Essence(1) Rastafla(1) xuru(1) Apocalypticmosh(1) UsernameLife(1) savag3blow(1) Drobbit(1) rex13hk(1) BurnOne(1) mrkeki(1) Clipse(1) KhaosKind(1) hrmmm(1) jplar523(1) Myztyrio(1) mac10289(1) Lluis83(1) glennert(1) RedWarrior0(1) Mntoothpick(1) Djhopper :)(1) Sengiratolom(1) Cloudstorm2(1) padewan09(1) pandoras_box(1) MrJ0shua(1) IKronozI(1) THE DARG(1) JChace029(1) teffy(1) Phdinpain(1) Klaymore(1) slobad121(1) 132jh(1) Tarutao(1) Nadrin(1) toriii13(1) Hotshot2k4(1) Nervontuxis(1) Panurge(1) Katarsis(1) TheMartyr24(1) YeliyaYue(1) Sage880(1) Kamietsu(1) zhen_rogue(1) Colossus(1) thatnewguy(1) joaopcl(1) stereosound(1) octonus(1) nerd1(1) lokiburn4(1) einish(1) dirktheone(1) takezoido(1) Soularmadyl(1) Tea is good(1) Zerker(1) 3RIFECI(1) grindpower(1) kakakaak(1) lukce(1) gavsword(1) rakankrad(1) Spherical(1) primarycolors(1) Heavyweight(1) YawnChainHow(1) Isei(1) Tymalous(1) Camoninja(1) Xylo(1) Tiko(1) Drakow(1) nhan1st(1) UTAlan(1) Metahater(1) thehairykiwi(1) cyanspirit(1) Sylved(1) Toenail(1) MorriNZ(1) Thiefboy109(1) k3e3(1) Gwill(1) Ryanthehood(1) guy_fawkes(2) implosion(2) BadBoyK(2) kev(2) killsdazombies(2) nilsieboy(2) fnix(2) Vineroz(2) proman1355(2) xdude(2) Artois(2) xKelevra(2) bigbadbanana(2) Mastermind79(2) yeasy(2) andy80528052(2) Zsotti(2) venumuse(2) jc14(2) The Emperor(2) Clathius(2) Amnesiac(2) Shruggy(2) Belthus(2) Mithcairion(2) 9jacob4(2) Blues(2) RootRanger(2) quantik(2) funplay(2) diocane(2) Cobra(2) darkfrogger(2) kirchj33(2) MeetJSquared(2) digitalevil1(2) Baily18(3) trozman(3) Dragoon(3) Xoned(3) bojengles77(3) thraexis11(3) bluemilk(3) catalyzeme(3) zombie0(3) Malignant(3) coldfusion(3) Hodari(3) Malebolgia(3) Celidion(3) ZeGuitarist(3) ArtCrusade(3) leoyanwaiting(3) Kjaska(3) Bonestorm(3) siriosirio(3) Jangoo(3) Time_lord_victorius(3) Elementalicious(3) daccoo(3) the_unknown(3) Amilir(4) asymmetry(4) Terroking(4) WakSkylicker(4) P-e-K(4) timtwins(4) geekz_always_win(4) xn0ize(4) PlayerOa(4) Chapuz(4) PaulWog(4) lava golem(5) PuppyChow(5) Bender74d(5) burne(5) Kurohami(5) MYF(5) Kuross(5) Tuntor(5) Avenger(6) jumpoffduck(6) LootPinata(6) Xelax(6) BatCountry(6) JotS3(7) Egarran(7) ddevans96(7) Zubon(7) pikachufan2164(7) omegareaper7(7) bruce 1337(7) kintar(8) stinky472(8) Svenningen(8) morningstar(8) wushu(8) Mahon(8) genraenera(9) tinkady(9) frlaa(9) finkel(10) miniwally(10) RavingRabbid(10) bucky1andonly(10) Seph454(11) Dragoon1140(11) Ifailgood(11) Noobiecakes(11) rotface(12) Averam(12) Krahhl(13) hermantheowl(14) gocubbies1212(14) jmdt(15) 7_Deadly_Sins(16) JJ 52(16) Jappert(17) $$$man(20) MrBlonde(21) Fallower(22) sSethia(23) tyranim(24) wavedash(32) tttt(32) CB!(33) guolin(41) TheForbiddenOracle(41) josh223123(42) TheIdioticIdiot(47) kobisjeruk(49) TheOwner(66) Nume(106)

CB!

  • Guest
Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=9545.msg125825#msg125825
« Reply #384 on: July 27, 2010, 08:04:46 pm »
@JJ 52
... and your father smelt of elderberries...

JJ 52

  • Guest
Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=9545.msg125827#msg125827
« Reply #385 on: July 27, 2010, 08:07:00 pm »
@JJ 52
... and your father smelt of elderberries...
Thanks for noticing that, not sure how I missed it :P

Offline catalyzeme

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 337
  • Reputation Power: 0
  • catalyzeme is a Spark waiting for a buff.
  • New to Elements
  • Awards: War #3 Winner - Team Fire
Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=9545.msg126049#msg126049
« Reply #386 on: July 28, 2010, 12:30:17 am »
Has anyone tried putting Liquid Shadow into this deck? For all the growth gods, I'd rather the creature just die (and do some damage) then just grow out of its anti-mattered-ness. You could use it on your Lava Golem in a pinch against gods with no creature control, or use it to EM. Anyone tried it?

xKelevra

  • Guest
Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=9545.msg126096#msg126096
« Reply #387 on: July 28, 2010, 01:15:48 am »
Is anybody else having absolutely horrible experiences with this deck? :x I've been trying this deck for a little while now and my record so far is 9-91. I'm sure that I'm playing this deck right, but I have yet to beat even the easiest of gods. The only times I've won are when I got lucky and the god had a low amount of towers or had no creatures to play.

CB!

  • Guest
Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=9545.msg126170#msg126170
« Reply #388 on: July 28, 2010, 03:05:11 am »
Is anybody else having absolutely horrible experiences with this deck? :x I've been trying this deck for a little while now and my record so far is 9-91. I'm sure that I'm playing this deck right, but I have yet to beat even the easiest of gods. The only times I've won are when I got lucky and the god had a low amount of towers or had no creatures to play.
Something doesn't sound right, there... What variant are you playing?  I've hit bad streaks, but nothing like that...

Kurohami

  • Guest
Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=9545.msg126176#msg126176
« Reply #389 on: July 28, 2010, 03:10:19 am »
I'm having an absolutely great time with this deck, it's such a sweet mix between high win rate and speed. :D

xKelevra

  • Guest
Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=9545.msg126200#msg126200
« Reply #390 on: July 28, 2010, 04:13:43 am »
Is anybody else having absolutely horrible experiences with this deck? :x I've been trying this deck for a little while now and my record so far is 9-91. I'm sure that I'm playing this deck right, but I have yet to beat even the easiest of gods. The only times I've won are when I got lucky and the god had a low amount of towers or had no creatures to play.
Something doesn't sound right, there... What variant are you playing?  I've hit bad streaks, but nothing like that...
I'm playing the original build. I'm about to try your version, though.

hermantheowl

  • Guest
Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=9545.msg126203#msg126203
« Reply #391 on: July 28, 2010, 04:20:51 am »
Using this version. Went with a version with Aflatoxin. Sometimes one Aflatoxin is a Miracle. Testing that.

Code: [Select]
6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u7 6u7 71c 71c 77f 77f 77i 7dq 7dq 7gp 7gp 7q5 7q5 80h 80h 80i
 

Offline jmdt

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2782
  • Reputation Power: 33
  • jmdt is a Ghost, obsessed with their Elemental pursuits.jmdt is a Ghost, obsessed with their Elemental pursuits.jmdt is a Ghost, obsessed with their Elemental pursuits.jmdt is a Ghost, obsessed with their Elemental pursuits.jmdt is a Ghost, obsessed with their Elemental pursuits.jmdt is a Ghost, obsessed with their Elemental pursuits.
  • New to Elements
  • Awards: Slice of Elements 10th Birthday Cake
Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=9545.msg126205#msg126205
« Reply #392 on: July 28, 2010, 04:22:08 am »
Is anybody else having absolutely horrible experiences with this deck? :x I've been trying this deck for a little while now and my record so far is 9-91. I'm sure that I'm playing this deck right, but I have yet to beat even the easiest of gods. The only times I've won are when I got lucky and the god had a low amount of towers or had no creatures to play.
Something doesn't sound right, there... What variant are you playing?  I've hit bad streaks, but nothing like that...
I'm playing the original build. I'm about to try your version, though.
I have a slightly better win % with CB!'s build.  The aflatoxin and jade shield make all the difference some games.

Artois

  • Guest
Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=9545.msg126287#msg126287
« Reply #393 on: July 28, 2010, 07:44:49 am »
Is the Jade shield carried in addition to 2xpermafrost, or is it preferable to carry 1xJade, 1xPerma?

sSethia

  • Guest
Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=9545.msg126293#msg126293
« Reply #394 on: July 28, 2010, 08:07:29 am »
Is the Jade shield carried in addition to 2xpermafrost, or is it preferable to carry 1xJade, 1xPerma?
I'm finding that it works extremely well with 2 permafrost and 1 jade.

Offline Svenningen

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 852
  • Reputation Power: 10
  • Svenningen is taking their first peeks out of the Antlion's burrow.Svenningen is taking their first peeks out of the Antlion's burrow.
  • bepbop
Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother? https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=9545.msg126332#msg126332
« Reply #395 on: July 28, 2010, 10:17:56 am »
Has anyone tried putting Liquid Shadow into this deck? For all the growth gods, I'd rather the creature just die (and do some damage) then just grow out of its anti-mattered-ness. You could use it on your Lava Golem in a pinch against gods with no creature control, or use it to EM. Anyone tried it?
I'd rather not give him any heals, besides, it wouldnt optimize the deck for more gods.


]
Is anybody else having absolutely horrible experiences with this deck? :x I've been trying this deck for a little while now and my record so far is 9-91. I'm sure that I'm playing this deck right, but I have yet to beat even the easiest of gods. The only times I've won are when I got lucky and the god had a low amount of towers or had no creatures to play.
Something doesn't sound right, there... What variant are you playing?  I've hit bad streaks, but nothing like that...
WOW, I had about a day where I went 5-20 and simply gave up. But 9-91 o.0

Is the Jade shield carried in addition to 2xpermafrost, or is it preferable to carry 1xJade, 1xPerma?
I'm finding that it works extremely well with 2 permafrost and 1 jade.
I second this motion, 1jade for octane etc and perms elsewhere.
This deck asides from original needs the PA, the jade and the afla. -1hg. Not sure where I stand with miracle/heal, i like having both aswell. Anyone?

This is my variant.
Code: [Select]
6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u7 6u7 71c 77f 77i 7dq 7dq 7dq 7gp 7gp 7n2 7n5 7q5 7q5 7q5 80h 80h 80iI like having the EE.
*points at title of deck*
*points at EE*
*shakes head disapprovingly*

 

blarg: