1
Competitions / Re: Competition: Epic 3 Card Design Challenge
« on: May 08, 2010, 04:14:45 pm »So, I enter A, C and D in the competition, and have B not an entry?i think she's saying you can enter A, B, and C, or A, B, and D.
This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
So, I enter A, C and D in the competition, and have B not an entry?i think she's saying you can enter A, B, and C, or A, B, and D.
It still doesn't give you the right to rip them off.i've never seen the set that this card came from. i stopped playing magic when i got to college five years ago. i didn't rip them off, and i'm not going to cross reference every one of my ideas against every mtg card just to make sure i'm being original.
5 cost for 9 damage? Either up the cost or lower the attack.you have to sac a creature to have it enter play. the cost of two physical cards, and the cost to put the previous card into play is included in the cost. 5 for 9 is completely reasonable in this scenario. i'm not going to nerf this card out of existence.
It would be more balanced if you took out the ability part (devour)?i reduced the HP so as to make the synergy with devour less scary.
btw did you give her a boob job?
Use it on a oty/scarab, and you get a 9 HP devourer that can devour for free. FFQ is pretty OP as well. But the worst would be a buffed leaf dragon... infinite for free? Pretty OP if you ask me.hm, didn't think about leaf dragon. you really can't do too much damage with a lot of life quanta, but i'm not fan of infinite combos. i'll increase the cost to 1 .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe I'm just used to the basic/special thing 'cause I play Pokemon, but I thought it was rather obvious that this was special and thus bound by normal card limit.it's obvious because he said it. the card does not imply it. if you can include more than six quantum pillars, there is no reason one wouldn't think the same for this card.