Guest Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bruce 1337 (17)

Pages: [1] 2
1
Neptune / Re: Oracle : Neptune
« on: May 25, 2011, 05:52:29 am »
Deflagrations are for Permafrost Shields
Code: [Select]
5f6 5f6 5f6 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61s 61s 61s 61s 61s 61t 61t 61t 61t 61t 61t 61v 61v 61v 61v 61v
After last ai improvement u should leave much more hp with this deck because Neptune will use shockwaves to kill u.

2
War Archive / Re: War betting - Win 10 upped Shards!
« on: March 26, 2011, 06:44:21 pm »
 :entropy :darkness :gravity :fire :earth :death :aether :time :light  :underworld :water :air :life

3
Graviton / Re: Oracle : Graviton
« on: March 23, 2011, 05:40:02 pm »
steal their grav shield (if you havent found any yourself) or weapon (if you have)
save antimatters for chargers, lobo everything else (dont put AM on creatures with >5 HP b/c you wont be healed if you have grav.shield in play)
Code: [Select]
5f3 5f3 5if 5if 5if 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u7 6u7 749 749 77i 7q5 7q5 7t9 7t9 80h 80h 80h
My main problem with this deck was too low damage. Ye i know i should add some more dmg like forest spectre maybe, but i wanted to test this deck and it doesnt work too good imo tho. Heres my fight:


4
Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?
« on: March 08, 2011, 05:32:28 pm »
i think that permafrost wont save u from gods with explosions ;)

5
Lionheart / Re: Oracle : Lionheart
« on: March 07, 2011, 08:27:27 pm »
Sorry for the double post, but I thought this deserved a new post:

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink
Deck import code : [Select]
6rm 6rm 6rm 6rm 6rm 6rm 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 749 749 749 749 749 75m 75m 75m 75m 75m 75m 75m 75m 75m 75m 7jp 7q8 7q8 8ps




As far as I can tell, this prety much has a 95% win + EM rate. EC will quint all his creatures so he won't be able to rewind anything once he dives under 5 cards. The only thing that can beat this deck is when he stops quinting creatures.

Keep the RoL to rewind obviously. Only thing that can hit you will be his weapon slot eternity and his scarabs (when less then 6). The game will take long, but when you have EC as your predicted next FG, a 95% EM deck is always nice :D

Btw, the idea came from MrBlonde originally. I will keep testing to see if it can lose.

Result:


This deck works great, used similar with unupped pendulums, and full victory of course :) game wasnt as long as i thought becouse he used his hourglasses like a crazy and i didnt need to rewind photon

Heres the result:


No card this time but still em with 200 hp is good:)

6
Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?
« on: February 25, 2011, 01:46:27 pm »
nah i fractaled it, dunno why ive done it :)

7
Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?
« on: February 25, 2011, 01:06:59 pm »
ye i know it was pure luck :D

8
Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?
« on: February 25, 2011, 01:02:31 pm »
my first won with dark matter  8) Oty ate gravity nymph wtf ;D


9
Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?
« on: February 18, 2011, 02:01:20 pm »
lol 1200 quanta :)

10
Issue Archive / AI Osiris
« on: January 29, 2011, 10:03:01 am »
I think it's not so important becouse he has even too much time quanta, but it looks kinda weird when he tries to generate scarabs even though he has no creature spot awailable :)

11
Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?
« on: January 29, 2011, 09:48:02 am »
I've try this deck a bit and I'm not sure it's so good as its fame.

1) Many times there's a lack of quanta

2) Some FG called 'easy' are not, think at Fire queen, you need 4 cards for win. Usually when they are out you are probably almost out of card in the deck.

3) The deck is VERY slow and FG are fast so while you wait your cards, or pray for time quanta, FG already has a small army and SoG are not enought.

4) It's enought a stupid creature with Butterfly for completely Fxxk you.

So those are some reasons that have made me doubt about the affidability of this deck.

Probably I'm a bit unlucky but in 107 games I've played everything I needed for win the FG was for 80% of the time six, seven cards before the end of the deck... and that's, in most of the case, not enought for lower 200 HP.

IF i should vote for the best FG deck my vote wouldn't go here.
Probably was good in the past not nowadays.

I'll try RoL/Hope.
Weird... I have much higher win rate nowadays. Maybe you just need to learn how to use this deck better :P or make a modifications that fit your play style :)

12
eternity is also very good with mindgate, dont forget about it (imo without eternity mindgate is even a bit useless :P)

Pages: [1] 2
anything
blarg: bruce 1337