elemental gods

[shileka]

the idea is to give each elements a "god" a very powerfull (and very expensive) card as of now this are the ideas for unupped, upped versions would simply cost less to play (costs still need to be balanced)

 
loki god of chaos
cost:
stats: 8/10
pasive: immortal & when targeted with any card a pandemonium effect triggers for all creatures
ability: does -1/1 to self, this counts as being targetted by a card
ability cost:

 
anubis god of the death
cost
stats: 0/9
pasive: generates one skeleton at the end of each turn
ability: until next turn skeletons cannot be destroyed and they gain +1/0
ability cost: 

 
thor god of lightning
cost:
stats: 10/5
pasive: when destroyed generates up to 8 ball lightning in your hand
ability: cast lightning effect on 2 targets
ability cost: 

 
neptunus god of the sea
cost: 
stats: 6/7
pasive: flooding effect
ability: for this turn all your creatures are considered to be water element
ability cost: 

 
gaia goddes of earth
cost: 
stats: 2/12
pasive: destroys one pillar or pendulum each turn (randomly selected, can be both your oponents or yours)
ability: guard (delays oponents creature and attacks it, regardless of wether it is airborne or not)
ability cost:

 
flora goddes of life
cost:
stats: 4/8
pasive: heals you for 1HP for each sapling on the field at the end of each turn
ability: generate a number of saplings ( 0/2 no ability) equal to the amount of HP you healed last turn+1
ability cost: 

 
helios god of the sun
cost:
stats: 20/0
pasive: when destroyed damages you equal to it's attack
ability: growth (+2/2)
ability cost: 

 
nyx goddes of darkness
cost: 
stats: 5/8
pasive: vampire (damage is returned as healing)
ability: corupted growth (+3/-2)
ability cost: 

 
shiva goddes of light
cost:
stats: 0/10
pasive: decreases own HP by 2 each turn
ability: great blessing (increases the stats of all your light creatures by 2/1)
ability cost: 

 
atlas god of gravity
cost:
stats: -5/50
pasive: gravity pull
ability: increases HP equal to the amount of gravity quanta you have divided by 2
ability cost:

 
chronos god of time
cost:
stats: 7/5
pasive: reverse time on self itself at the end of every turn
ability: attacks one extra time for every 10 time quanta in your possesion (this effect can be used the turn this card is played)
ability cost:

 
aeolus god of winds
cost:
stats: 9/0
pasive: sky blitz (all your airborne creatures deal double damage this turn)
ability: airborne (casts airborne on self)
ability cost: 

[Angriness]

Wow I really like this idea, too bad no one checks in this area... 

Just re-read chronos though, needs a new passive because he would not be able to use his effect with out the help of other cards

[shileka]

Wow I really like this idea, too bad no one checks in this area... 

Just re-read chronos though, needs a new passive because he would not be able to use his effect with out the help of other cards

true, didn't think about it

[choongmyoung]

I think nymphs are god-ish enough.
These are not more than gamebreakers.

[shileka]

I think nymphs are god-ish enough.
These are not more than gamebreakers.

still need to be balanced, maybe make them more expensive, and the chance of them being added is 0%, this is just fun and games

[TheAccuso]

Sure the entropy god is an "immoral" one

[shileka]

Sure the entropy god is an "immoral" one

thank you

[Drake_XIV]

Hm, reuse of the name Anubis.  While it does fit Death better in some arguments, you do have to work with what is already in-game.


Some of these, like Aeolus, clearly outclass Dragons.  That being said, don't forget those when balancing costs.

Some of these implications say that there will only be one played at a time.  If not, then some of these, like Aeolus, are dreadfully overpowered.

[shileka]

Hm, reuse of the name Anubis.  While it does fit Death better in some arguments, you do have to work with what is already in-game.


Some of these, like Aeolus, clearly outclass Dragons.  That being said, don't forget those when balancing costs.

Some of these implications say that there will only be one played at a time.  If not, then some of these, like Aeolus, are dreadfully overpowered.

i'm thinking about two things A only one each deck, or B when 2 with the same name exist on the field both are destroyed

and yeah, they need balancing, a lot

[Drake_XIV]

Hm, reuse of the name Anubis.  While it does fit Death better in some arguments, you do have to work with what is already in-game.


Some of these, like Aeolus, clearly outclass Dragons.  That being said, don't forget those when balancing costs.

Some of these implications say that there will only be one played at a time.  If not, then some of these, like Aeolus, are dreadfully overpowered.

i'm thinking about two things A only one each deck, or B when 2 with the same name exist on the field both are destroyed

and yeah, they need balancing, a lot

And here I give a small spiel regarding why I don't support such mechanics.  Rather, my predecessor put it in a better way.

I think your only allowed to have one on your side of the field at a time, for balance purposes.

The problem with cards that only allow 1 copy (legendary, hero, avatar, ...) is that this ^ is not a balance tool. It does not impact balance despite its deceptive appearance. All it does is artificially limit the card pool versatility and disguise potential imbalance.

[shileka]

Hm, reuse of the name Anubis.  While it does fit Death better in some arguments, you do have to work with what is already in-game.


Some of these, like Aeolus, clearly outclass Dragons.  That being said, don't forget those when balancing costs.

Some of these implications say that there will only be one played at a time.  If not, then some of these, like Aeolus, are dreadfully overpowered.

i'm thinking about two things A only one each deck, or B when 2 with the same name exist on the field both are destroyed

and yeah, they need balancing, a lot

And here I give a small spiel regarding why I don't support such mechanics.  Rather, my predecessor put it in a better way.

I think your only allowed to have one on your side of the field at a time, for balance purposes.

The problem with cards that only allow 1 copy (legendary, hero, avatar, ...) is that this ^ is not a balance tool. It does not impact balance despite its deceptive appearance. All it does is artificially limit the card pool versatility and disguise potential imbalance.

true enough

[TheAccuso]

To avoid the fact that as someone already said the game doesn't need OP gamebreaking creatures, you may win those, as pets from the oracle.