Demon's knife / Demon's dagger

[rickerd]

Knife 4 dammage      Dagger 6 dammage             (cost: 4  for both)
and both they have 40% chance to attack one of the opponent's creatures instead.

any sugestions?

[Pineapple]

Make it deal less damage to the creatures, 40% chance for 6 damage to a random creature per turn is pretty powerful, and it would cost way too much for a 6-attack dagger. Balance it to Owl's Eye.

Otherwise, give it a quanta upkeep like flooding has.

[rickerd]

Make it deal less damage to the creatures, 40% chance for 6 damage to a random creature per turn is pretty powerful, and it would cost way too much for a 6-attack dagger. Balance it to Owl's Eye.

Otherwise, give it a quanta upkeep like flooding has.

for example let it drain one darkness quanta per turn?

[Brontos]

Looks real big strong to me. A passive permanent CC.
What is the cost you're planning to give to the knife/dagger?

[rickerd]

Looks real big strong to me. A passive permanent CC.
What is the cost you're planning to give to the knife/dagger?

Both 4 darkness i think
But it's not stronger as eagle's eye eagle's eye snipes for 3 dammage each turn and this weapon has 40% chance to deal 4/6 dammage to one of the opponents creatures and it doesn't deal dammage to opponents hp that turn

[mega plini]

I'dd say that a weapon that attacks creatures at random is ok. But if you could remove the randomness and changed it into a weapon that dammages both a creature and a player, it would be better i think. of course we'll still need a downside to the card then. Instead of de randomness, you could interduce a life draining-system: you lose life equal to the dammaged creature health or something like that.

[rickerd]

I'dd say that a weapon that attacks creatures at random is ok. But if you could remove the randomness and changed it into a weapon that dammages both a creature and a player, it would be better i think. of course we'll still need a downside to the card then. Instead of de randomness, you could interduce a life draining-system: you lose life equal to the dammaged creature health or something like that.

no then it would be OP

[mega plini]

I'dd say that a weapon that attacks creatures at random is ok. But if you could remove the randomness and changed it into a weapon that dammages both a creature and a player, it would be better i think. of course we'll still need a downside to the card then. Instead of de randomness, you could interduce a life draining-system: you lose life equal to the dammaged creature health or something like that.

no then it would be OP

why? Owl's eye isn't any different.
you just pay with hp istead of quanta