An example of a new series I wanted to start

[FACE2face]

NAME: Aspect of Wildfire ELEMENT: Fire COST: 11 TYPE: Permanent ATK|HP: TEXT: In the end, both chaos and flame will overcome and consume all	NAME: Aspect of Wildfire ELEMENT: Fire COST: 10 TYPE: Permanent ATK|HP: TEXT: In the end, both chaos and flame will overcome and consume all

ART: found on Google(copyrighted) IDEA: FACE2face NOTES: Effects of the card: All your and creatures gain a +1/+0 for each creature you play All your and creatures gain +0/+1 for each creature you play All your and creatures without an ability gain Devour I've had this idea for a while now. This is just one of the cards that I want to  put into a series, which will be named Aspects. The idea of the series was to have the most 'relatible' elements benefit from each other. The second idea of the series was to have the cards description somewhat poetic and cryptic for two reason, because that's just who I am and because all the effects of cards couldn't fit in the given space without looking...ugly. Anyway its here because its not all that balanced and I found the pictures on Google so they are most likely copyrighted. SERIES: Aspects-hopefully

[russianspy1234]

if the cards are all going to be complimentary elements, you might consider using hybrids:
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,46114.0.html

1. it's not necessarily better, but something to consider.
2. check out sxc.hu for public domain images, they have a decent collection of fire and/or colored cloud stuff you could use.

[FACE2face]

if the cards are all going to be complimentary elements, you might consider using hybrids:
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,46114.0.html

1. it's not necessarily better, but something to consider.
2. check out sxc.hu for public domain images, they have a decent collection of fire and/or colored cloud stuff you could use.

I was originally thinking about using them but I think, in a sense, that hybrids are more balanced while the Aspects of my series side more or less with one element. Plus these cards don't combine two elements they represent similarities between the two. Sorry for sounding so brash but I'm rubbish when it comes kindly denying someone else's opinion.

[russianspy1234]

if the cards are all going to be complimentary elements, you might consider using hybrids:
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,46114.0.html

1. it's not necessarily better, but something to consider.
2. check out sxc.hu for public domain images, they have a decent collection of fire and/or colored cloud stuff you could use.

I was originally thinking about using them but I think, in a sense, that hybrids are more balanced while the Aspects of my series side more or less with one element. Plus these cards don't combine two elements they represent similarities between the two. Sorry for sounding so brash but I'm rubbish when it comes kindly denying someone else's opinion.

no its fine, just making sure you knew about them (the project needs more exposure anyway). nothing wrong with a single element card boosting multiple elements (eg nightfall)

[legion_bre]

Instead of creating force dual decks, you could do this:
- Have the card have Primary (attack) and Secondary (hp) components liek you currently have
- Have the primary element be your current mark. If primary mark = secondary mark, there effect is voided.
- Have the secondary element be defined.

That way the set could have 12 cards - one for each element, and it would make them all even and able to be played as any dual, instead of forcing particular elements into pairs.

I think adding devour as well probably makes things a bit too OP

description could be:
":mark / creatures gain +1/0 when :mark creature played and 0/+1 when creature played"
":mark / creatures gain +1/0 when :mark creature played and 0/+1 when creature played"
":mark / creatures gain +1/0 when :mark creature played and 0/+1 when creature played"

etc