Clans

[Higurashi]

I personally find the arbitrary concept of a team leader/general being able to use upped cards very unfair. I don't see the point of it in War, and I don't see the point of it anywhere else. They haven't done anything to deserve it inside of the event, and if you're afraid matches won't be varying enough, you have a problem with the entire event that should be solved.

Furthermore, 5 people in a team is very unwieldy. I like 3 better, in that case.

[MyNameIsJoey]

... i agree with this after all, no leaders

[LongDono]

I like the no leaders thing as well, however based on how these events go there will need to be a way for clans to decide things. Leave it up to the clan? If we do that then who will speak for the clan? These are small issues but I thought we should talk about it.
I like leaving it up to the clan, or majority vote.

[Higurashi]

Having leaders is fine. Leaders are not dictators, or persons of supreme power. They are persons who motivate the team and organize their efforts for maximum efficiency and output. Majority vote is always a better route than dictatorship, as the weight of one's vote should come from the respect of others rather than a forced rule. That said, having someone who can make the final call on decisions where the team can't come to an agreement is vital. Leaders should have the trust of their team to be allowed to do this when needed.