Hey, it WAS on topic, we were discussing the reason for motivations for God to ask a person to kill the world. It was a few posts ago so I guess it got smushed.
Anyway, even if God tried being a person, he wouldn't suddenly gain human characteristics to have fun killing people or ''his property''. He cannot/should not change, being already perfect.
To restate, God would not simply ask someone to kill others for fun, because he cannot have fun and he is supposedly all-loving. If he asked such a thing it would be some kind of test.
This finally ties back to how you should act when asked such a question by God.
God didn't try being a person, he WAS a person. He did have human characteristics. I encourage you to read any of the gospels...trust me he did. The purpose between me and that close-minded guy was to show God can have fun. It is possible. On the philosophy on religion, it is very possible God can be an immoral God. God is also all omni=he can change. [Now, as far as human characteristics go, we need to be careful. There is a lot of debate over the passage in Genesis where God makes humans in HIS image. Maybe our characteristics are God's. It's a possibility, but again I can't say much.]---just a response, don't worry about this bracketed part, let's stay on topic
Bad people can act loving then later turn on you. Happens all the time. What if this whole time God ACTED loving, even dying on the cross (best troll ever if this is true) to make us believe he's loving but in reality wanted to set us up top maximize his fun. Again this is really only important to the topic of if God is a bad God and nuking the world is his idea of fun.
Maybe God is a bad God and nuking the world was forced upon him. Maybe there are multiple Gods, and hes the scapegoat to take the blame for other Gods?
(Side note, interesting how the evolution argument included God making the universe). I have taken the liberty of posting a the part of my notes here for you guys to read. This information was created by Pierre-Simon LaPlace and Hume. Here is my response: if God is bad, has been trolling us this entire time, nuking the world could be a possibility. If God is good, why can't he be the puppet of other God's?
Evolutionists then make their case: 1) Doesn't get you the Judeo-Christian God and 2) Doesn't prove God is infinite. Hume said the universe is finite. Doesn't take an infinite God to make a finite universe. You only need a powerful God. Your cause should be proportioned to the effect. Example: Let's say you are in the weight room and a 100lb. weight is in front of you. You don't need infinite amount of strength to pick it up. You only need enough strength to pick it up. Like Physics: A 100lb. wheel in front of you needs 101lb or more of force to move it. In the same way: if the universe id finite, you only need a strong enough or powerful enough God to create it, not an infinitely powerful God. 2) Since we don't get the Judeo-Christian God, God doesn't have to be good. Explains disease, war, famine. Also, then there could be more than one God. It takes lots of people to make a watch, especially a big one like the universe. Where there are lots of people, usually there are both men and women. God can also be a "she." And what happens when men and women are around? They have sex= produce little Gods. This is not the Judeo-Christian God.