Zanzarino (Lead Developer) speaks about new features

[Appawesome]

Q: If I get Green Nymph from Oracle, do I have to have 5 Green Nymphs to enter it?

[TheonlyrealBeef]

Of course, we still need buffs for this patch.  FFQ lower cost, perhaps? 

Pharaohs want to have a word with you.

[jmdt]

Of course, we still need buffs for this patch.  FFQ lower cost, perhaps? 

In this case, ffq would need unnerfed.  ffq was one of the cards that got the nerf stick back when SG's rainbow won like 90% versus the fg's.  If any of these cards gets unnerfed, I'd like to see the cost of bond lowered.

[BluePriest]

The main post needs to be updated better...  Unless the three times I just looked, I completely missed it... it says nothing about sanctuary. I only found out by browsing the thread.

[1world24]

1 - ji412jo
0 - morningstar
-1 - xdude
-2 - 1world24

[Kael Hate]

Q: If I get Green Nymph from Oracle, do I have to have 5 Green Nymphs to enter it?

A: The oracle will give directions on the rules, it might have nothing to do with the card you spin.

[ddevans96]

[21:44:36] zanzarino: The T500 deck has to follow the oracle's directions
[21:44:50] zanzarino: Meaning it has to contain 5 copies of the card given by the oracle

I'm guessing those go together, and it will always have to do with the card you spin.

[Kael Hate]

[21:44:36] zanzarino: The T500 deck has to follow the oracle's directions
[21:44:50] zanzarino: Meaning it has to contain 5 copies of the card given by the oracle

I'm guessing those go together, and it will always have to do with the card you spin.

Given - as in given in the instructions.

Not given as the card shown from the spin.
Like a pet or the FG or the cash given, it does not have anything to do with the card shown.

[Kamietsu]

[21:44:36] zanzarino: The T500 deck has to follow the oracle's directions
[21:44:50] zanzarino: Meaning it has to contain 5 copies of the card given by the oracle

I'm guessing those go together, and it will always have to do with the card you spin.

Given - as in given in the instructions.

Not given as the card shown from the spin.
Like a pet or the FG or the cash given, it does not have anything to do with the card shown.

That's just an assumption, Kael. What Zanz says most probably refers to the card the oracle gives you via spin. But until we get confirmation from Zanz, it's all just speculation on how he meant that sentence.

[Kael Hate]

[21:44:36] zanzarino: The T500 deck has to follow the oracle's directions
[21:44:50] zanzarino: Meaning it has to contain 5 copies of the card given by the oracle

I'm guessing those go together, and it will always have to do with the card you spin.

Given - as in given in the instructions.

Not given as the card shown from the spin.
Like a pet or the FG or the cash given, it does not have anything to do with the card shown.

That's just an assumption, Kael. What Zanz says most probably refers to the card the oracle gives you via spin. But until we get confirmation from Zanz, it's all just speculation on how he meant that sentence.

Q: If I get Green Nymph from Oracle, do I have to have 5 Green Nymphs to enter it?

A: The oracle will give directions on the rules, it might have nothing to do with the card you spin.

Well when we go back up the quotes I had said "might" have nothing to do with the spin and Zanz earlier had used given when refering to other things the oracle does other than the card shown. And if for some reason it is based on the card shown and its rare and you can't build the deck, I guess its just too bad you won't be able to sumbit that day.

[Kamietsu]

[21:44:36] zanzarino: The T500 deck has to follow the oracle's directions
[21:44:50] zanzarino: Meaning it has to contain 5 copies of the card given by the oracle

I'm guessing those go together, and it will always have to do with the card you spin.

Given - as in given in the instructions.

Not given as the card shown from the spin.
Like a pet or the FG or the cash given, it does not have anything to do with the card shown.

That's just an assumption, Kael. What Zanz says most probably refers to the card the oracle gives you via spin. But until we get confirmation from Zanz, it's all just speculation on how he meant that sentence.

Q: If I get Green Nymph from Oracle, do I have to have 5 Green Nymphs to enter it?

A: The oracle will give directions on the rules, it might have nothing to do with the card you spin.

Well when we go back up the quotes I had said "might" have nothing to do with the spin and Zanz earlier had used given when refering to other things the oracle does other than the card shown. And if for some reason it is based on the card shown and its rare and you can't build the deck, I guess its just too bad you won't be able to sumbit that day.

What you said before, and what you said that I quoted said two different things. Your answer used might while the other part you said was you giving something definitive, I was just correcting

[Kael Hate]

[21:44:36] zanzarino: The T500 deck has to follow the oracle's directions
[21:44:50] zanzarino: Meaning it has to contain 5 copies of the card given by the oracle

I'm guessing those go together, and it will always have to do with the card you spin.

Given - as in given in the instructions.

Not given as the card shown from the spin.
Like a pet or the FG or the cash given, it does not have anything to do with the card shown.

That's just an assumption, Kael. What Zanz says most probably refers to the card the oracle gives you via spin. But until we get confirmation from Zanz, it's all just speculation on how he meant that sentence.

Q: If I get Green Nymph from Oracle, do I have to have 5 Green Nymphs to enter it?

A: The oracle will give directions on the rules, it might have nothing to do with the card you spin.

Well when we go back up the quotes I had said "might" have nothing to do with the spin and Zanz earlier had used given when refering to other things the oracle does other than the card shown. And if for some reason it is based on the card shown and its rare and you can't build the deck, I guess its just too bad you won't be able to sumbit that day.

What you said before, and what you said that I quoted said two different things. Your answer used might while the other part you said was you giving something definitive, I was just correcting

Seriously? is there any more correctness in one statement than the other when neither is directly clarative and Zanz hasn't even put the architecture into place in a pre-cursory stage?