Shield | Tower Shield

[2rider]

buff, noone uses it.

[ishner]

the wording on the card says "reduce damage by"
other cards say "reduce physical damage by"

does this mean that spell damage is also reduced?

[SpikeSpiegel]

Nope. Spell damage cannot be reduced by a shield, but only reflected by some shields (Reflective shield and Emerald shield).

[Bluie Gamer]

It's pretty awesome, but the unupgraded version HAS to be a bit more expensive, like 2 quanta? I mean, it's completely splashable, and blocks 1 damage like some other cards, but doesn't have a secondary effect, so it should be just 1-2 quanta lower than those shields. Otherwise, it's awesome.

[eaglgenes101]

It's pretty awesome, but the unupgraded version HAS to be a bit more expensive, like 2 quanta? I mean, it's completely splashable, and blocks 1 damage like some other cards, but doesn't have a secondary effect, so it should be just 1-2 quanta lower than those shields. Otherwise, it's awesome.

The space a card occupies is a cost in itself. No need.

[dworthy]

It's pretty awesome, but the unupgraded version HAS to be a bit more expensive, like 2 quanta? I mean, it's completely splashable, and blocks 1 damage like some other cards, but doesn't have a secondary effect, so it should be just 1-2 quanta lower than those shields. Otherwise, it's awesome.

The space a card occupies is a cost in itself. No need.

Besides, the fact that the card occupies the shield slot is also a cost. Equipping more than one shield would be horrible. ( + would be overpowered.)