With SoFo we have not only PC for every element, it even REPLACED the PC that we had before.
Monofire / immolation decks no longer use explosions because SoFo is BETTER.
In my opinion it needs to be nerfed AT LEAST to the point where it becomes worse (yes, worse, not equal to) in its use than an explosion in a fire deck or a rainbow.
What is your reason for why an Other card should be worse than an elemental card in a rainbow? (Being worse in an elemental deck is obviously good design)
As always, you are right :-). Scratch that bit. Argument still stands though.
(being: should be worse than explosion somehow)
Removing all quanta would actually take away its supposed "other" = rainbow synergies.
But to me, "other" does NOT mean rainbow, just "anyone can play it".
You wouldnt put a sword or a tower shield in your rainbow when you can have, say, vampire dagger and permafrost.
You shouldnt put a SoFo in your rainbow when you can have explosion (which should be the better choice but isnt).
Shards should be a way to get a specific element`s traits, even if you dont play that element.
Want healing, but dont like life? Get a Shard of Gratitude. It will work, but not as good as in its natural environment (lifemark).
Sadly, most of the newer shards turned their back on that rule.
It would make way more sense to me if the "PC-Shard" was the fireshard, and the shard of bravery was the timeshard.
(draw cards = time trait, but your opponent draws too, so its worse than hourglass)
By making the shards "new and exciting", they lost their original theme.