Crusader | Crusader

[jmdt]

I <3 weapons.  This card is great.

[Vineroz]

Is it just me, or is the Light symbol on the card different than the Light symbol we all know?

You are right...nice observation . A new remake again??

[nilsieboy]

i really love this card, can be great fun with flying discords .

[Sir Valimont]

I will repeat the same thing I always say when I talk about this card idea. I think that the ability should use instead of . Reason for this is that it fits the Crusader theme better. Crusader, although seeing themselves as the "good guys", did some pretty evil stuff, therefore .

I also like cards that use opposite elements. This would be a perfect change to get a creature.

I'd also like to see a creature that used . It would be like an evil creature with some good inside it. Maybe he is evil but wants to be better? But yeah that's off-topic..

Other than the ability cost.. the card looks great, ability is great, everything is great.

Awesome.

I agree in principle that it would be nice to have some fusion between and but I'm not sure this is the right card for it. With an ability cost of , this card is really quite difficult to use. As it is, it fits duo decks because (presumably) it will acquire a weapon's ability as well as the quanta cost to implement it; which means that for weapons like Trident, Crusader's effective use already requires 3 quanta types. Adding to the mix would make it unusable in that context.

As it is there are a lot of nice fusions to think about. I've always liked / with Angels and Armaggios but this is another nice duo with Titans. I guess Crusader would lose its Endow ability when it absorbs a Titan, right? If it just gained +7 attack and Momentum, without losing Endow, it could be a ridiculously powerful combination ...

[ddevans96]

Loved the idea. Glad it might be in the game                

[Kuroaitou]

Well, I didn't expect to see this one coming~

Fourth reliquary card, here we come.  A problem with the wording though is that Crusader's "Endow" ability implies that it can target either weapon on the field:

"Gain the target weapon's ability and +X|+2. X is the weapon's attack"

O_o I would find it crazy useful if you could also copy the opponent's weapon...

[suxerz]

I believe that's the intention - both your own weapon AND your opponent. We'll see once it's in the trainer.

[Ryli]

Vampires?  Evil.  Parasites?  Evil.  Stealing sh*t?  Evil. 

Angels?  Good.  Hope?  Good.  Blessings?  Good.

Vampires: Hungry with odd appetites.
Parasites: Annoying and sometimes deadly, but not always evil.
Stealing: Depends on who you steal from, and for what purpose. Is it evil to steal a corrupt rulers power?

Angels: Generally good people, but everyone has an evil side.
Hope: What? Is it not possible to wish for bad things?
Blessings: Is it good to get the blessings of an evil person.

But I won't argue about Kael Hate

The card has a good ability and promotes synergy between more elements, which is usually a good thing.

[EvaRia]

Looks awesome.
Would be fun in an entropy deck =O

[Falcon4415]

The new symbol happens to divert my attention from the awesome card we have here. Is there a thread/poll/something about it? Is it because the old symbol had to much detail in comparison to the others? Why? When? How? And so on.

[Nepycros]

If it endows itself with an 'Other' weapon, it should retain the endow ability, so it can keep getting stronger as opposed to simply gaining 2 attack and becoming otherwise useless. How many daggers can this guy carry? That's what I'd like to know.

[karthikking]

FINALLY!!!