Mitosis | Mitosis

[Spherical]

I, along with many others, like Mitosis better when it was 3 and can target weapons. Mitosis is NOT OP once you give it some good testing. It was nowhere being OP even in weapon decks. Change it back please!

[Marvaddin]

IMO it's a mistake to make mitosis not work on flying weapons, it's just counter-intuitive and thats a major fault in a card game .. if we are to stop the spam of flying weapons why don't just make the daughter weapon go to the weapon slot? The daughter creature never inherts any changes in the mother anyway, that would be intuitive ...

I agree. I dislike it copying a combo of 2 cards, but copying a single card is its effect anyway. I wouldnt have a problem about daughter weapons in weapon slot. Wouldnt be a good use of Mitosis, in fact, but its ok.

[rowcla]

umm i actually managed to make a deck which had a 100% win streak (most were ems) against loads of FGs, if you ask me thats op, although i do agree that the cost nerf was a bit too much

[thatnewguy]

Share teh deck.

[gavsword]

After the nerf, it's about perfect. Love it as a card and is a great boost. I still preferred the old cost, or even one less than current.

[rowcla]

Share teh deck.

is it really necessary? i mean testing is impossible with the new nerfs

if youre really bothered though its on an older page, page 19 or something

[thatnewguy]

i agree with most of these people now, flying weapon decks are way too good with this, i managed to beat loads of fgs with this deck

Code: [Select]

7ac 7ac 7ac 7ac 7ac 7ac 7al 7al 7al 7al 7al 7al 7ap 7ap 7ap 7ap 7ap 7ap 7b0 7b0 7bu 7bu 7bu 7bu 7bu 7bu 7n2 7n2 7n2 7n2
however a solution could be to make weapons go to the weapon slot instead of being animated when using this card, please discuss this

No, most people are realizing that these decks arent nearly as good as they originally thought they were. And going to the weapon slot has already been discussed. If it does become a problem, then that would be an easy solution, however, It isnt a problem at this point. Similar decks to yours have been made, and at first they seemed good, then after a while, it was realized that they are only getting a VERY SLOW 39% rate.

Ill test out that specific build to make sure though.

So Far-
Incarnate:0-1
Gemeni:0-1
Paradox:1-0 (this says a lot, since hes obviously one of the harder gods  We will just ignoren the fact that he didnt draw a single blessing, so he wasnt able to ohko like he normally is.)
Morte:0-1- Another one of the easier Gods. He was able to outdamage my healing, and I got oe of the best possible draws in the world with this deck too.
Scorpio:0-2-This was just humiliating...first battle was over almost instantly, the second battle I got another near perfect draw... which just mean that I survived a few turns longer before he killed me.
Graviton:0-1. An army of firemasters can outdue 100 healing any day....

I really dont feel like doing more testing, cause its sorta painful watching this deck get annihilated. Is that enough testing, or do you need even more to be convinced its not as good as originally though.

Apparently it wasn't that OP to win every game with non nerfed.

[rowcla]

well whenever i tested it i won, maybe that person was just unlucky

[doublecross]

How many times did you test it?

[rowcla]

How many times did you test it?

10 or so times

[BluePriest]

Ive slaid many a fg, with many a deck. I can assure you that was not bad luck, as I said several games I got the perfect draw fo my deck, meanwhile, the opponent got the average, or sometimes even below avg fg draw, and yet, I was slaughtered. The deck just isnt a good FG slayer.

[Newbiecake]

umm i actually managed to make a deck which had a 100% win streak (most were ems) against loads of FGs, if you ask me thats op, although i do agree that the cost nerf was a bit too much

That deck was actually tested by some experienced players already and achieved a win rate of 38%...not even close to 100. You probably just got super lucky, or did you skip hard gods?