Skillgannon's Speed Blitzing: Mono-Life

[Glitch]

I'm not arguing that feral bonds are the right/wrong answer, I'm arguing that it's a minor point with no real answer.  While in the long run it has a chance get you more money faster for your rainbow, not all elements players want to do that.  And as it's a life mono deck, the person who'd play it would probably want some life gain, as that is life's real point.

So I guess what I'm trying to say is:
If you're simply making this deck to zip ahead for a rainbow, don't put the EBs in.
If you're doing this for fun, because you like the element life, or if you have no plans to make a rainbow:
Put in the EBs.

[icybraker]

... I... guess? But why would you play Level 3 for fun?

[Glitch]

Because you don't have the money for upgrades, don't have a duo deck for gods, and don't feel like playing a cliche rainbow deck?

It's not where you're going but how you get there.  Sure, I might not be able to beat the gods yet, but the day will come when the deck I thought of on my own rises up and kicks the snot out of seism, and on that day I'll enjoy elements more than I ever could have with a carbon copy deck.

[icybraker]

How will you know this day will come? Where you're going is still a very important thing to decide; instead of going to Defeat-The-False-Gods-Land, you might be headed for Aimless-Useless-Fantasy-Land.

Additionally, I think a pure aggro is more "fun" than a Bonded aggro. Simply because its faster, which allows for a more satisfactory victory. Others may disagree.

[Zigabogado]

Simple not-so-strategic deck. Its neat and clean, and sometimes profitable.