AdrenaFrog EM!

[powdergame99]

Hey everybody, this is a Mono-Life deck made for fairly quick EMs. The deck (as of now) is:

by powdergame99

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5bs 5bs 5bs 5bs 5bs 5bs 5bs 5bs 5bs 5bs 5bs 5bu 5bu 5bu 5bu 5bu 5bu 5c2 5c2 5c2 5c2 5c2 5c2 5c5 5c7 5c7 5c7 5c7 5c7 5c7 8pn

I'm having 9270984 test this, I'll edit this out once he's done.

[TribalTrouble]

Upped I think that may be the right amount of towers. However unupped you end up with this
Source: http://www.quantum-index.com/qi.php?deckCode=5bs+5bs+5bs+5bs+5bs+5bs+5bs+5bs+5bs+5bs+5bt+5bt+5bt+5bu+5bu+5bu+5bu+5bu+5bu+5c2+5c2+5c2+5c2+5c2+5c7+5c7+5c7+5c7+5c7+5c7+8pn&showImage=1
Cost: 81
Ability Cost: 0
Quanta Generation: 55
QI: 7.36 (too few pillars)
Looks like Grabbix can easily defeat this deck just out of quantum generation as it is very unlikely you'll be able to stall with heals that only heal 20hp for 3 life quantum. Maybe -2/3 heals +3 pillars?
Note: I did not test this so take that all with a few grains of salt.

[agentflare]

Yeah, I've tried decks like this before, you need more pillars. Take out 1 frog and 1 adrenaline and add 2 more pillars for optimal use. Or -1 dragon and +1 pillar.

[powdergame99]

Yeah, i agree with you guys, after a bit more testing I have found that it works better -3 dragons, +1 pillar, +1 druidic staff, +1 heal. This is the version i'm currently working with:

by powdergame99

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5bs 5bs 5bs 5bs 5bs 5bs 5bs 5bs 5bs 5bs 5bs 5bu 5bu 5bu 5bu 5bu 5bu 5c2 5c2 5c2 5c2 5c2 5c2 5c5 5c7 5c7 5c7 5c7 5c7 5c7 8pn

Changing the OP to this deck now.

[TribalTrouble]

Seems to me that the glaring issue is the first draw. If you don't draw any of those frogs you are screwed.
6/30=.02 That means you have a 2% chance of actually drawing any of the frogs.

[powdergame99]

Seems to me that the glaring issue is the first draw. If you don't draw any of those frogs you are screwed.
6/30=.02 That means you have a 2% chance of actually drawing any of the frogs.

No offense, but your math is a bit flawed. 6/30 is, in fact, 0.2, not 0.02. Therefore, you have a 20% chance of drawing one of the frogs. And that's just for the first card you draw.

[willng3]

Seems to me that the glaring issue is the first draw. If you don't draw any of those frogs you are screwed.
6/30=.02 That means you have a 2% chance of actually drawing any of the frogs.

In addition to what powdergame stated, you're forgetting that you draw 7-8 cards in your first hand where one of them has the possibility of being a Frog.  The draw chance is actually much, much higher than that.  Without accounting for things such as auto-mulligan, the estimated draw percentage for 7 cards should be around 83%.

[TribalTrouble]

Ahh I see. Sorry for the error in my math. Looking back I think I just typed it wrong :p. Also, You're right will. Probably would end up being 4/23 or something like that instead.

[Momofunk]

Been playing this deck the last couple of days - very fun! Have about a 2-1 win ration on AI3, probably 20%-ish on EMs. I made a slight modification, adding in 2 emerald dragons to deal with some pesky shields. Still plays quickly and quite well, even at 32 cards.

Excellent deck to start out the game with, for sure!