Frostbite | Frostbite

[ZephyrPhantom]

NAME: Frostbite ELEMENT: Water COST: 2 TYPE: Permanent ATK|HP: TEXT: Weapon: Deals 4 damage. On damage freezes a random card in your opponent's hand for 1 turn. (It can't be played.)	NAME: Frostbite ELEMENT: Water COST: 2 TYPE: Permanent ATK|HP: TEXT: Weapon: Deals 6 damage. On damage freezes a random card in your opponent's hand for 1 turn. (It can't be played.)

ART: Elements the Game - Arsenic (Masscolder/Photosynthesis/Shattari), Edited by ZephyrPhantom IDEA: ZephyrPhantom NOTES: SERIES:

[kirbylover314]

I really really like this. It can help deal with those game changing tipping points, like breaking a Dim/Wings/Dial chain. Screws with OTKs a fair bit, RIP Chapuz.

Also the beatstick option is nice too

[AD TienzuStorm]

Hm. So would Frostbite Saders basically be unstoppable once there are eight total?

I'd say lower upped attack to 5 because I'm a bit worried about balance, but other than that I really like it.

[kirbylover314]

Hm. So would Frostbite Saders basically be unstoppable once there are eight total?

I'd say lower upped attack to 5 because I'm a bit worried about balance, but other than that I really like it.

Don't think so, it would random. So it's possible to freeze the same card. On that note, what would happen to a card frozen twice? Does it stack or just stay 1 (like BB)?

[UndeadSpider1990]

I really really like this. It can help deal with those game changing tipping points, like breaking a Dim/Wings/Dial chain. Screws with OTKs a fair bit, RIP Chapuz.

Wouldn't break Dim chain if it couldn't hit the opp Otherwise I totally agree though, this is a sweet card, and if any Element should be the first to get a 2nd weapon it should be Water.

I think the damage looks good, as it's effect will rarely be game-breaking, yet it is rare. So it stands to reason it should not be weaker than Longsword.

Go Crucible!!

[ZephyrPhantom]

Hm. So would Frostbite Saders basically be unstoppable once there are eight total?

I'd say lower upped attack to 5 because I'm a bit worried about balance, but other than that I really like it.

Yep, though that would require you to trio with and or . Prepare the gimmick decks. =P

I think the attack's fine if compare it to Vampire Dagger, which scales similarly.

Otherwise, glad that everyone likes the card! Submitted to Crucible, given the positive feedback.

[Solaris]

Simple and elegant. I have no qualms voting this into Cygnia. Nice work, Z.

[OdinVanguard]

Hm. So would Frostbite Saders basically be unstoppable once there are eight total?

I'd say lower upped attack to 5 because I'm a bit worried about balance, but other than that I really like it.

Yep, though that would require you to trio with and or . Prepare the gimmick decks. =P

I think the attack's fine if compare it to Vampire Dagger, which scales similarly.

Otherwise, glad that everyone likes the card! Submitted to Crucible, given the positive feedback.

Under Cygnia Advent, you could trio with and which would allow use of spirit pillars with mark