instant destruction- instant destruction

[mrtwigie01]

NAME: Instant Destruction ELEMENT: Fire COST: 76 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: TEXT: Instantly reduces opponent's hp to "0".	NAME: Instant Destruction ELEMENT: Fire COST: 76 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: TEXT: Instantly reduces opponent's hp to "0", whilt you get maximum hp.

ART: http://www.pinktentacle.com/images/blast_9.jpg IDEA: mrtwigie01 NOTES: SERIES:

[Anarook]

1) Your art link doesn't prove you have free use of it. Please link to the source site when it may be proven you can use this artwork.
2) Fix the title, it should read Instant Destruction | Instant Destruction
3) The ungodly cost, while not unrealistic for certain fire archetypes, is something that will be frowned upon heavily. High cost cards are meant to be powerful and such, but this is overboard. Also, why 76?
4) Neither of the present effects will ever be acceptable. Instant win is unreasonable to begin with. And the upgraded free EM will never be accepted as evidenced by Miracle.

I assume you're new to the game and cardmaking, I suggest taking a look around at the rules and then browsing some of the current ideas out there. Browse the higher level polls, they'll give you a good idea of some successful ideas. Then try to find what works for you and the community. Card design is about innovation. You come up with an idea and the community helps you perfect it.

[ashashin]

how the heck do you get 76 quanta?!

[Anarook]

Fire stalls easily build up 100+ .

[Fireleaf]

Is this meant to be humour? Because the quanta cap is 75.

[Anarook]

When did quanta cap at 75? ( I seem to be behind somehow) that rather pisses me off, it's like they're trying to destroy the fire archetype decks.

/sry offtopic

edit: Found the patch notes, that just pisses me off, why is my favorite element getting nerfed every time I turn around...

On topic- I can only assume this is intended as humor after this astonishing discovery.

[mrtwigie01]

this card was meant to be unrealistic, except for trainer

[Fireleaf]

this card was meant to be unrealistic, except for trainer

So then why was it posted in the Smithy, which is for serious card ideas, without any kind of note indicating it was intended for the trainer? For that matter, what purpose does it serve in trainer?

[willng3]

Quanta cap also exists in Trainer despite you being able to give yourself 100 of every quanta, for the record.

[eaglgenes101]

I assume this is a joke?

[Absol]

I assume this is a joke?

A bad one, at that.