181
Patch Notes and Development News / Re: Redeemable Codes Warning
« on: August 07, 2010, 11:46:36 pm »
Zanz you make me 
+1 post
+1 post
Guest Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
182
Tournament Archive / Re: Western Tournament - 7 August 2010 - unupped, no spells
« on: August 07, 2010, 06:15:41 pm »
Smokefree 2
Rastafla 0
Rastafla 0
183
Buff This Card! / Re: Fire Spirit | Fire Spectre
« on: August 01, 2010, 05:15:21 am »Well personally i dont think the Grand Master of Fire needs and more Creature Buffs to add to his assault"Airborne" is barely a conceivable buff until there are more things that rely on "Airborne."This card just got a buff last month new passive ability "Airborne"
Also, I just used this guy today in the No Land Stompy deck. Personally, I think it needs more attack right off the bat. :/
184
Game Suggestions and Feedback / Re: New name for upgraded steal
« on: August 01, 2010, 05:05:42 am »
Thanks Beeeeeeeeotchhhhhh!!!
185
Game Suggestions and Feedback / Buff / Nerf this card!!!!
« on: August 01, 2010, 05:00:26 am »
There is definite unbalance among several card within Elements, I'm no statistician but instead of nit picking ever powerful and weak card in the game. Maybe changes on a Global scale is what Elements needs.
The Card pool is ever increasing. Maybe we should look at lowering the maximum number of copies from 6 to 5. and or upping the minimum deck size to 35 cards or higher??
With this example you now have only 5 supernova's in a 35 card deck (14.2% of the deck ). instead of 6 in a 30 (20% of the deck ). or 5 in a 30 (16.6% of the deck).
Lets not nerf all the great cards but maybe a smaller frequency of drawing them would be more beneficial.
This is just what I think sorry if someone posted something similar. SG make the forums so HUGE!!
The Card pool is ever increasing. Maybe we should look at lowering the maximum number of copies from 6 to 5. and or upping the minimum deck size to 35 cards or higher??
With this example you now have only 5 supernova's in a 35 card deck (14.2% of the deck ). instead of 6 in a 30 (20% of the deck ). or 5 in a 30 (16.6% of the deck).
Lets not nerf all the great cards but maybe a smaller frequency of drawing them would be more beneficial.
This is just what I think sorry if someone posted something similar. SG make the forums so HUGE!!
186
Buff This Card! / Re: Fire Spirit | Fire Spectre
« on: August 01, 2010, 04:24:36 am » This card just got a buff last month new passive ability "Airborne" 
187
League Archive / Re: Championship League 2/2010
« on: July 31, 2010, 09:29:29 pm »
smokefree 2 girlsgeneration 1
188
Tournament Archive / Re: Western Tournament - 31 July 2010 - Rainbow
« on: July 31, 2010, 08:10:10 pm »
smokefree 2 mutantkickass 1
189
Tournament Archive / Re: Western Tournament - 31 July 2010 - Rainbow
« on: July 31, 2010, 07:34:40 pm »
smokefree 2 puppychow 1
190
Tournament Archive / Re: Western Tournament - 31 July 2010 - Rainbow
« on: July 31, 2010, 06:36:18 pm »
smokefree 2 bojengle 0
191
General Discussion / Re: The BAD BEAT thread
« on: July 04, 2010, 12:05:16 am » I LOLed so hard at this thread BTW grats on 200!!
192
General Discussion / Re: What Are the Odds? Hypergeometric Probability and You
« on: July 03, 2010, 11:56:14 pm »
Thanks Coin for taking the time to post and explain this calculator.
This is an awesome tool for the statistically challenged.
This is an awesome tool for the statistically challenged.