1
Card Ideas and Art / Re: Lenity | Grace | Blank Permanent
« on: December 19, 2010, 02:52:19 am »
"Sacrifice 1 creature" I think this might fit better as a death card the card art is also "deathy"
Guest Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1] 2
2
Crucible Archive / Re: Rum | Grog
« on: December 19, 2010, 02:45:37 am »
"Gain 5 life points every time a Pirate or a Buccaneer is summoned."
Also you need to make the card say points as it doesn't while the description does
Maybe you should switch upped and unupped names as rum is much better that grog.
The card effect seems pretty balanced and helps
so I like it.
Also you need to make the card say points as it doesn't while the description does
Maybe you should switch upped and unupped names as rum is much better that grog.
The card effect seems pretty balanced and helps
so I like it.
3
Crucible Archive / Re: Swashbucklin' | Swashbucklin'
« on: December 19, 2010, 02:40:07 am »
"Each of your creatures randomly attack an opponent's creature or your opponent this turn."
4
Crucible Archive / Re: Keelhaul | Walk the Plank
« on: December 19, 2010, 02:37:53 am »
Did you mean with the least hit points?
5
Crucible Archive / Re: Gentlemen o'fortune | Carte Blanche
« on: December 19, 2010, 02:36:26 am »
I think it would be better with 1 less cost and affect unburrowing or just 2 less cost.
6
Crucible Archive / Re: Jack | Jolly Roger
« on: December 19, 2010, 02:33:13 am »
It should read "Opponent's creatures don't ...."
7
Forge Archive / Re: Fiddlers Green | Fiddlers Green
« on: December 19, 2010, 02:27:41 am »Yeah I guess the schroedy's cat doesn't really break this. The cost and off elementness diminish its usefulness.
Edit: wait do cats lose there buffs when you use their skill ill go check
Edit: Edit: Sorry I misread your post
8
Design Theory / Re: Weird idea
« on: December 19, 2010, 02:10:52 am »You didn't actually defeat your opponent. You used a card that granted you a win and massively shifted the balance of play.I agree with 7 turns but in regards to "You didn't actually defeat your opponent" I don't agree.
That being said:
If this were to be implemented, I think 7 turns would be a good starting point.
I also think this would be like a doomsday device card with a time bomb like effect. The benefit of that is that it can be defused with PC.
Other card games have cards like that and while nobody wants elements to play the same as other card games it is important to have variety in fact if this were eventually put in I would want cards that make mill decks feasible.
The reason I mention that is that if you think about it how would not having any more spells cause you to just die most of the time you would not have even lost had you not decked out
9
Tournament Archive / Re: Western Tournament - Dec 18th - Biohazard
« on: December 18, 2010, 06:17:07 pm »
round 1
sakmon 2:0 justinc
sakmon 2:0 justinc
10
Archived Decks / Re: Submerged Blizzard-Water/Aether FG Killer(with inundation O:)
« on: December 16, 2010, 10:13:34 am »
I like this deck when I thought about making a inundation deck I was going to try using nightmare and photon so the ai would fill their middle row mostly with photons. I couldn't get the cost to work out.
11
Octane / Re: From Oracle to Octane, no rares or upgraded cards
« on: December 14, 2010, 09:54:12 am »
Not only did I EM octane with this deck but I also won 3 upped eagle eyes. I'm overjoyed. 
12
General Discussion / Re: Elements Christmas Sweeptakes!
« on: December 13, 2010, 02:52:55 am »
I want a nymph plushie it doesn't matter what element nymph I'll leave that up to the oracle.
Pages: [1] 2