Guest posts by sSethia

25

Forum Archive / Re: Best deck for grinding t50?

« on: August 09, 2010, 07:52:10 pm »

Code: [Select]

6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u7 713 745 77f 77g 7ae 7ah 7ai 7dm 7dq 7ds 7gm 7gv 7ju 7n6 7n8 7q5 7t9 7t9 80g
I've been using a speed rainbow (originally based on terroking's version) that has morphed over time. Lately I added Wings and Improved Anti-Matter to counter Life Rush and CC Why Bother Decks. Sometimes I add a Liquid Shadow to replace one Improved Steal. I just use the Unstable Gas for fun really, though it does help with ROL Hope sometimes.

On an interesting side note, I had 2 Mirror Matches today (Huzzah for me), I beat myself once and got killed by Unstable gas once too.

Using 2 wings might be better. Wings can block a lot of monsters such as the Giant Frog and Cockatrice rush and a golem rush. I'd replace the UG with it and take out the heal for a solid 30-card speedbow.

26

General Discussion / Re: Best Weapon In Elements? YOU DECIDE!... With Pictures =D

« on: August 09, 2010, 12:53:59 am »

Fahrenheits are nice. Awesome damage.

27

Patch Notes and Development News / Re: Elements 1.25

« on: August 08, 2010, 11:46:21 pm »

I'm enjoying all the new things except the Pufferfish buff.

Agreed. I really hate making FG harder, dunno really what the point of this change.

The Pufferfish buff is caused by the new scorpions. If the Pufferfish did 2 for 5 while the Forest Scorpion did 2 for 3 , it would be way too under-powered.

28

Trio & Quartet / Re: Anything you can do I can do better

« on: August 08, 2010, 11:09:59 pm »

http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/board,213.0.html

29

Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?

« on: August 08, 2010, 11:08:05 pm »

Man, I was on like a 5-0 Winning streak and then i started losing to all the easy FGs im now at like a 0-6 losing streak

Yeah, stuff like this seems to be happening  A LOT to me with this deck. My score is at at stand-still at 24,000 flat.

30

Life / Re: Friends of the Druid - A deck optimised for score via EM

« on: August 08, 2010, 04:49:23 pm »

There's enough healing, so you can replace the two Jade Staves with Long Swords, which do 6 damage.

31

Deck Help / Re: Need Offense in this deck, what can i take out?

« on: August 08, 2010, 03:58:54 pm »

-3 Obsidian Towers
+1 Devourer
+2 Obsidian Dragons
+1 Fractal
Change mark to :darknessmark

32

Rainbow Decks / Re: (almost) NON-UPGRADED False God Rainbow

« on: August 07, 2010, 07:35:36 pm »

Code: [Select]

4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4vo 52n 52r 52r 55r 55r 592 5c6 5c6 5f8 5li 5oj 5rl 5ro 61t 61t 621 621 621 621 6u6 7q5 7q5




How about this one? any tips or deck critiques?

You have too much usage. Remove at least 1 quintessence. Also, you need the Sundials. It's hard to win without them as you need to stall to build up your bonewall.

33

General Discussion / Re: I broke 9500 wins today. What players have the most wins?

« on: August 07, 2010, 06:20:29 pm »

it really makes me angry when people can just have 107,350 electrum sitting around for no reason....on the other hand gratz for getting that much with no reason to spend it

"really angry" haha.  well maybe he wants it sitting around so that he can buy and upgrade new cards immediately after they are added to the game.

All i meant was that he clearly has all his cards upgraded and an extra 100k electrum on the side. It makes me more jealous than angry but still angry because i could really use 100k electrum......

He worked for it. It's not like he magically got rich. If you spent a lot of time on this game, I'm pretty sure you could do it too!

34

Archived Decks / Re: Twins Butterfly (50% win rate FG farmer with stat)

« on: August 07, 2010, 06:14:54 pm »

which FG shares a purple nymphs?

None, you have to spin them from the Oracle.

35

FG Proposals / Re: Fake God Proposal: Mutant

« on: August 07, 2010, 06:08:21 pm »

Very, very similar to Chaos Lord.

36

Anvil Archive / Re: Skeleton Regent | Skeleton King

« on: August 07, 2010, 04:24:04 am »

I just happened to stumble across this thread as I stumbled through the forums. If only you'd advertised this idea a bit better Jmdt, maybe told people about it in the chat! xD

Anyways, I think it's a nice idea- works well with other cards- good synergy with Boneyard, etc like sSethia said. I know it's pretty much obvious, but you should probably say 'Where N is the number of skeletons on the field'- cards like Scarab show it's necessary or people might get confused and start crying.

Nice art and like the skill as well.

Actually, quick idea- People don't tend to *like* having skeletons on their side. They're defeated easily and owned by all shields. Considering you'd need your field *full* to have a high attack from the Regent, you could view this as an actual disadvantage, i.e it's not worth using the Regent because of the obstruction having the skeletons cause. Would saying N is equal to *all* skeletons on both fields.

Whadaya reckon?

Well people don't like having skeletons on their side because they don't really help. With this card in play, however, skeletons actually serve a purpose. Skeletons are actually pretty strong when combined with Eclipse. (4|3).