Guest posts by padewan09

1

Competitions / Re: Voting: Card Design Competition: Shard Madness!

« on: September 12, 2010, 05:52:23 am »

Congrats Essence!

Someday I'll beat you! (Just like Team Rocket will some day beat Ash )

2

Card Idea Competition Submissions / Re: Shard | Shard of Cooperativeness

« on: August 20, 2010, 04:14:29 pm »

Fixed to match.

3

Card Art / Re: Psychedelic fractal vortex

« on: August 19, 2010, 07:45:58 pm »

Hmm... willingly discording yourself? Interesting

4

Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?

« on: August 19, 2010, 06:15:17 pm »

Correct, sadly. Would be nice to be able to get rid of a momentum creature with it.

5

General Discussion / Re: mind gate and nightmare

« on: August 19, 2010, 06:10:01 pm »

I see, but all I'm saying is it wouldn't work if your opponent didn't have nightmare

Well isn't that true of any combo? Fractal devourers doesn't work too well without it's devourers.

And it really isn't that much quanta, don't forget if it was an upped nightmare it's only 2 aether and 1 darkness. In perfect circumstances, I could get that from one quantum tower

6

Card Ideas and Art / Re: Marid | Elite Marid

« on: August 18, 2010, 05:16:29 pm »

Gravity Pull.... and my immediate thought went to Liq Shadow + this = awesome.

7

Competitions / Re: Card Design Competition: Shard Madness!

« on: August 18, 2010, 05:05:14 pm »

Fixed to be cooperativeness instead of co-operation.


http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,11401.msg150066#msg150066

8

Card Idea Competition Submissions / Re: Shard | Shard of Co-operation

« on: August 18, 2010, 05:01:10 pm »

Fixed.

9

Card Idea Competition Submissions / Re: Shard l Shard of Charity

« on: August 17, 2010, 08:11:59 pm »

Honestly Kael, the fact you can spew dictionary info doesn't help your platform. And  since you are the ONLY person who seems to give any care that the cards be the most exact and precise flawless immaculate examples of a card ever seen. You may be card curator, but by saying that a shard has to fit YOUR idea of the card, you are taking out ANY reason for a public competition. If you want to limit the creativity of cards to YOUR vision of them, next time fight against public creation.

If it wasn't for Kuro, I'm betting cards wouldn't ever make it passed this stage of creation. There'd be no need for crucible, forge, etc.

10

Card Idea Competition Submissions / Re: Shard l Shard of Charity

« on: August 17, 2010, 06:29:36 pm »

Defeating your opponent has nothing to do with holding virtue.

It is not virtuous to restrain your opponent. To do so is not to live conforming to the moral and ethical principle of restraint but instead to apply law to someone else.

The second had to do with defeating the opponent... but you called it non-virtuous. If you have to restrain your opponent to win... why is it excepted from "defeating your opponent has nothing to do with holding virtue"?

11

Card Idea Competition Submissions / Re: Shard l Shard of Charity

« on: August 17, 2010, 04:40:08 pm »

Kael, I think you're focusing on the wrong part. A virtue does not make it virtuous. Virtue of Charity. and since the card name would be "Shard of Charity", there's no reference to the "Virtue of" part in the card itself.

12

Card Idea Competition Submissions / Re: Shard | Shard of Independence

« on: August 17, 2010, 04:11:48 pm »

Or it could kill all creatures with a duplicate, leaving one of each type?

Hehe. I think I see a counter to my shard with this one. I like it!