1
False Gods / Re: Most humiliating FG defeats
« on: March 24, 2011, 08:02:00 pm »
FG defeats
This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
You can "Up picture in this page, I still see regular use as very simple and straightforward: http://photobucket.com/ .You just paste the "IMG Code" from a complete picture on the forum.
I put a Purple Nimph in place of the Grey one.
v (http://imageplay.net/es/view/m7Gbd65504/Dark_Matter)
How I can make to put the image bigger?
6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u7 6u7 6u7 6u7 6u7 6u7 71k 74b 77f 77f 7ah 7dq 7gp 7gp 7gp 7gv 7gv 7q5 7q5 7q5 7t9 7t9 80d 80d 80d 80h 80h 80h 80h
6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u7 6u7 6u7 6u7 6u7 6u7 74b 74e 77f 77f 7ah 7dq 7gp 7gp 7gp 7gv 7gv 7q5 7q5 7q5 7t9 7t9 80d 80d 80d 80h 80h 80h 80h
What i got so far...Decks are quite impressive for their particular combination of "Etermity" with "Turtle shield."
But... I found out you MUST get the pharoah
(http://www.screenshotdumpster.com/)
I will simply explain this:
>4 hourglass is really enough, same as sundials, 5 is enough
>6 quanta tower is a bit low, esp I run out of entropy easy... at least thats what i thought until I realise I should only destory the very good permeant (e.g with a spam of scrab, empathy bond is nothing)
>9 Time tower (upped) is far more then enough, I've been using eternity pretty much every turn haha
>Pest is for early game to burrow (free quint), late game to bounce on hand, because it would have sucked the opponents quanta giving you a full of dark quanta, while bounching him would gives you more time to build scrab if pharoh came late
>Also if you can burrow Pest early, if later in game you are faced with alot of creature control and you need butterfly effect, you can unburrow pest, butterfly, quint
>2 PA is definitely enough, for seism, protect the towers, for everything else, shield + weapon
>2 Quint is enough, 1 on pharoah, 1 on firemaster (choose between FG rather you want ablaze or butterfly effect)/ butterfly pest
>2 empathy bond is way better then 1 bond 1 SoG because of the scrab spams
>Turtle shield is amazing, see below picture
Explaining turtle shield vs permafrost shield > Octane
(http://www.screenshotdumpster.com/)
1) Spawn Scrab and immediately reverse it with Eternity, hold them in your hand
(http://www.screenshotdumpster.com/)
2) Check if majority of things if in a time bubble, in this case owl's eye (it could be anything with creature control). Wait until the turn where the FG cant use it
(http://www.screenshotdumpster.com/)
3) Play all your scrabs and eat them all !!!
Nice to see that somebody also uses fat decks against gods . In my opinion these are complitely playable and can have normal results. Since somebody mentioned in chat that time-rainbows are underposted, I will show mine:Decks are mostly player initially, to attack the enemy decks are few possibilities to Win so soon is very low. I am still interested in efficiency than the match.Code: [Select]6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6u6 717 71b 71b 71c 74b 74b 77f 77i 77i 7do 7do 7gp 7n3 7q5 7q5 7q5 7q5 7q5 7q5 7q8 7q9 7q9 7q9 7q9 7q9 7q9 80d 80d 80d 80h 80h
Compared with the deck of this thread, there is not much originality, but it is tested for a long time and it works well. I also have short statistics about this deck i made recently:
http://img571.imageshack.us/img571/2867/newbitmapimage3r.png
I even didn't play particulary well these 100 games and made some noob's mistakes in winning positions (forgot about TU-s in games against Elidnis and Gemini). Although i met Neptune many times and this is certainly a part of the luck, I also was quite unlucky few times (decked out against Osiris because Eternity was my last card (!) and lost in winning game against Obliterator, because my PA which should have protected my Eternity, was last card). 100 games is not clearly enough for make conlusions, but I believe that the overall winning percentage of this deck is still somewhere 65-70. And the sad thing is that Dream Catcher is a real pain for fat decks
I saw the video. You came close to losing that time. What's the ratio of wins to losses on average for this deck?To win the "Rainbow False God" for Decks also have% (relatively low). If you're early, "Improved Antimatter" on your opponent's decks, the rate will increase to Win. Since its not much time to play games should not be able to test out the 100 game (For detailed statistics) everyone would understand ^ ^.