Guest posts by loudog

13

Entropy / Re: Antimatter, Dragons, Discord, and more Antimatter

« on: June 16, 2010, 04:27:04 am »

Hey Puppy didn't I see you use a version of this in CL that had shards of divinity?  BTW I feel like those would go great with this deck.

14

League Archive / Re: Championship League 2/2010

« on: June 15, 2010, 06:52:03 pm »

 ign loudog, current score 32,088, sorry for no score before

15

League Archive / Re: Championship League 2/2010

« on: June 14, 2010, 03:27:06 am »

loudog is my name for all, please sign me up!

16

Tournament Archive / Re: Eastern Tournament - 12 June 2010 - Unupped, mono-decks only

« on: June 12, 2010, 06:25:39 am »

loudog 2
edunavas 1

17

Tournament Archive / Re: Eastern Tournament - 12 June 2010 - Unupped, mono-decks only

« on: June 12, 2010, 05:50:03 am »

loudog 2
Rastafla 0

18

Tournament Archive / Re: Eastern Tournament - 12 June 2010 - Unupped, mono-decks only

« on: June 11, 2010, 10:54:38 pm »

loudog

19

Rainbow Decks / Re: Yaladilae's Butterfly Angel (v1.21)

« on: April 18, 2010, 06:03:28 pm »

Decay also has steal for permanent control

20

Trio & Quartet / Re: Master of Time FG Killer

« on: April 07, 2010, 02:20:32 am »

I've experimented with taking out the protect artifacts and adding 2 quantum towers but the quantum towers are best when you have a well protected eternity in place and you've established a nice long game.  I need more stats on this deck to be honest I just haven't had the time to experiment with it as much as I've wanted so I was hoping some people would try it out on the trainer or make it if they like the idea and have the money.  The 6 hour glasses help A TON when it comes to making sure you have those quantum towers and also keep in mind because you use time towers instead of quantum towers like the typical rainbow you can actually feed the hour glasses way faster and more often than in a scarred girl.

21

Rainbow Decks / Re: Skillgannon's False God Deck

« on: April 06, 2010, 03:06:56 pm »

To everyone reading this thinking this deck might be for them PLEASE KEEP IN MIND THAT TIHS IS PRE SUNDIAL NERF!!


REPEAT THIS DECK WAS CREATED PRESUNDIAL NERF

It's outdated and will not work as good as he has reported in the opening post and I really wish since he would modify his original post to state that (like scarred girl did with her ultimate god killing deck).

22

Rainbow Decks / Re: Scaredgirl's (almost) NON-UPGRADED False God Rainbow

« on: April 06, 2010, 01:43:48 pm »

This will be my final post like this in this thread.  I believe that I have fully documented the proof that this deck is a GREAT deck for newbies to use to earn funds for upgrading cards.  I, as a newbie, took this deck with zero upgraded cards and farmed FGs, upgrading cards as I was able.  All I did was listen to the advice on this thread and it worked.

Hey jallenw thanks for showing us some new variations but I just want to stress to everyone that your documentation has only proved that your scarred girl variation is as good if not a little worse than the original with as many cards as you have upgraded.

I noticed in your post a lot of losses against incarnate, morte, paradox, a few against fire queen, miracle, and no extra wins vs gods that the original scarred girl had trouble with.

A lot of people like myself have been working with scarred girls for months now and the most common problem I see with new people is they don't really understand how to play the scarred girl.  I recommend reading her strategy posts several times and even having them up while you play vs the gods as well as the wiki page like you recommended.

Of course variations like this that suit your play style better are always fun but adding a fractal just makes you rely way too much on aether and this deck already relies on aether with quintessence and phase shield.  I would say your variation actually hurts the steadiness of this deck a little.

I'm not trying to be rude I just wanted to post that this deck has been proved to already have a 50ish % winning ratio so making a deck that started with a 30% winning ration and then went up to barely 50% is not an improvement but you need to stick with whatever your play style can win with.

23

Archived Decks / Re: New Fire Deck Please Comment!

« on: April 01, 2010, 02:15:13 pm »

I'd thin it down if I were use.  Also, please us the input code with the deck generator on the site, so that reviewers could look at the deck while typing.  Will do so here:

My main problem with the deck is the size.  Take out the swarm of rain of fire to help thin it down.

The problem when it comes to fighting gods and E5s is a small deck tends to deck out but for pvp I agree with your point this deck it a little heavy. 

24

Archived Decks / Re: New Fire Deck Please Comment!

« on: April 01, 2010, 02:05:28 pm »

Someone needs to modify the sticky if this is the new way they want people creating posts.  I following the directions exactly and added the import code as a nice gesture.  Someone should create a new post telling people how to use the "(deck)" code (replace ( with [ ).