769
Round 3 / Re: (Light) Lt. ak65ala 2 - (Air) The Mormegil 0
« on: April 26, 2011, 05:49:07 pm »
Great work AK! Way to get us started on the right track this round!!
Guest Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
770
Elements Tools / Re: STATMASTA™realtec - Keep it real (now with actual cardspin rates!)
« on: April 25, 2011, 11:24:57 pm »@kirch: What happened to the display of your win-rate?First, I have no idea why it posted that way... I just added the forum code and voila!
It is set to format to "00,00%" so I am kind of puzzled how you got "020%" .
Damn, the "bug" is back. I thought I had dealt with this but apparently not.
For some reason, my Excel seems to reset the cell-formatting for this particular field,
hence joining 3 cells to make a large one keeps failing. Whyever the error-message claims
it has something to do with sheet-protection.
In the next update, this field will simply be 1 cell to avoid complications.
Secondly, I found that if you enter the deck code above, directly into the data entry spot (long bar representing the cell up top) it allows you to enter the deck code.
775
Off-Topic Discussions / Re: POST YOUR EPIC XTH POST HERE!
« on: April 24, 2011, 02:39:26 pm »
Posted somewhere else that it was my 200th, but I believe this is actually the big dog. Partytime!!!!
777
Light / Re: Round 3 strategy
« on: April 24, 2011, 07:42:29 am »
For my third round match against Gravity general, I would suggest either of the following two decks:
Edit:
or my 1st round deck:
No preference, whatever works best for the team with leftover cards.
Edit:
or my 1st round deck:
Code: [Select]
5f6 5f9 5f9 5f9 5f9 5f9 5f9 5fa 5fa 5fc 5fc 5fc 5fc 5fc 5fc 5l9 5l9 5l9 5l9 5l9 5l9 5lf 5lf 5lh 5mq 5mq 5mq 5mq 5mq 5mqNo preference, whatever works best for the team with leftover cards.
778
Metamorphosis / Re: Metamorphosis - Short break to discuss issues (Please help discuss).
« on: April 24, 2011, 07:14:07 am »
As far as byes are concerned: I think the option where the player posts 3 decks and completes their mark is far superior to allowing them to take a random completed mark. Some players may be trying to avoid certain marks and this may allow them to complete marks they feel are inferior by random chance.
I am also a bit confused about rules, and I seek clarity for a situation. I lost 2-3 in the first round. As I understand, I am to use the same 3 decks I posted and used in the first round, again in the second round. There is a good chance I may get matched up against someone who is not in the same situation as me. This would allow them to deckbuild against my 3 decks with the clairvoyance of knowing what they will face ahead of time? If this is the case, I find this to be an extremely unfair advantage. Thanks in advance for clarifying towards my situation, and others in similar.
I am also a bit confused about rules, and I seek clarity for a situation. I lost 2-3 in the first round. As I understand, I am to use the same 3 decks I posted and used in the first round, again in the second round. There is a good chance I may get matched up against someone who is not in the same situation as me. This would allow them to deckbuild against my 3 decks with the clairvoyance of knowing what they will face ahead of time? If this is the case, I find this to be an extremely unfair advantage. Thanks in advance for clarifying towards my situation, and others in similar.
779
Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.27) CC? Why Bother? - unupped
« on: April 24, 2011, 03:14:15 am »Hmmm, with the feedback for this deck I'll probably try it out on my spare when my main is on farm tomorrowWhile you're doing that, see if you think it needs a reflective shield. I've tried it both way and its already getting a bit chubby, but I think it may work better with -1 QT, +1 reflective shield.... or just simply adding the shield.
780
Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.27) CC? Why Bother? - unupped
« on: April 22, 2011, 05:30:35 pm »
After testing this more, it needs somewhere between 2-4 more pillars. I'll split the difference and modify the OP to go with 3 for now.