Guest posts by jj77

1

Issue Archive / timing glitch: hasten vs. mutation

« on: December 15, 2009, 10:09:52 pm »

While facing an opposing dragon, and while having both a fallen elf in play with enough life quantum to play his mutation ability, and also while having an electrum hourglass in play with enough time quantum to play its hasten ability, I clicked on the hourglass to play hasten and clicked on the fallen elf to play mutation very close together.

The game reacted by starting the card drawing animation and also by placing the target sight icon on all creatures in play and popping up the 'select a target/cancel' message box.  As the card drawing animation proceeded, the target sight icons disappeared, thought the message box remained.  Once the animation finished, any creature I clicked would not mutate, and eventually I clicked cancel to dismiss the message box.

I might expect the game to have kept up with the speed of clicking so that both the mutation and the hasten abilities would have executed without problem.  Although as well I don't really need to be clicking that superfast either.

2

Game Suggestions and Feedback / Gameplay mechanic suggestion: apply elemental marks to cards in play

« on: December 15, 2009, 10:09:52 pm »

Short form: Change the way buffs/debuffs are applied to creatures/permanents/players in play so that they go through a system whereby elemental marks are used to represent those effects.

Long form:

There are many different effects that can be applied to creatures/permanents in play and to players.  Creatures can be given a Blessing of +3/+3, permanents can be made immaterial, and players can be poisoned, as three examples.  There is a lot of different ways the game represents these effects.  There's a shield icon to represent gravity pull, blessing is just a change to the power and health numbers, there's a sphere-M icon for momentum, there's a time element icon for immaterial, and there's a death element icon and number for poison.  The game can sometimes become cluttered.

I suggest that all these effects be removed and replaced with an idea of applying elemental marks to cards in play, where the marks solely determine the effect.  I would reuse the mark of death icon with superimposed number structure from poison/infection as a model.

For example, when Blessing is played on a fresh creature, a mark of light icon with a '3' is displayed on the card.  Any creature with a mark of light adds +1/+1 per number onto its current stats.  Another Blessing would increase the number by 3 again.

Next, I would suggest that if a card with a mark on it is given a different mark-based effect from a different element, the existing mark (and associated effects) is removed and replaced by the new mark.

For example, if a creature with a light mark of 3 is targeted by an Infection effect from a Parasite, the light mark is removed, the creature loses -3/-3, and then the creature gains a death mark of 1.

I would suggest the following marks (for starters, just brainstorming for now):

• Death: as before, a creature with a death mark takes x damage at the end of turn, where x is the mark number; same for a death mark on a player's hp bar; poison concepts are rewritten as a more broad mark of death concept
• Light: a creature with a light mark has +x/+x on top of their current base stats, where x is the mark number; a player's hp bar with a light mark has +x current and maximum hp, where x is the mark number; Blessing now adds a light mark of 3 instead of +3/+3; Shard of Divinity adds a light mark of 20 to the player's hp bar when it comes into play, and removes any mark on the player's hp bar when it leaves play
• Life: a creature with a life mark heals up to x hp at the end of turn, where x is the mark number; same for a life mark on a player's hp bar; Heal would add a life mark of possibly 5 or 10; Holy Light would add a life mark of possibly 3 (or a death mark of 3 to death/darkness creatures); Druidic Staff would apply a life mark of 5 to the player's hp bar when it comes into play and remove any mark on the player's hp bar when it is removed from play
• Aether: a permanent with an aether mark is immaterial (can't be directly targeted) for x turns, where x is the mark number; a player's hp bar with an aether mark ignores creature attacks for x turns; Dimensional Shield would apply an aether mark of 3 to the player's hp bar, and it would remove any mark on the player's hp bar when it leaves the player's shield area; immaterial effects would apply an aether mark (with an appropriate number) instead of the current application of a time mark
• Time: a card in play with a time mark is evolved to its upgraded form, when the mark is removed the card (even if as a base was upgraded) the card is devolved down to the basic version; no number for this mark; Graboid ability 'evolve' is left unchanged
• Darkness: a creature or permanent with a darkness mark is considered the same as 'burrowed', ie, with power halved and unaffectable by any external effects; the 'burrow' ability is effectively renamed as 'shadow' or 'shroud' or 'retreat' or similar to fit the darkness theme, and 'unburrowing' is adjusted to fit as well; existing ability costs (often earth) can remain the same
• Earth: a creature or permanent with an Earth mark is considered to have 'momentum', in that it ignores most shield defenses, as well as +x/+x, where x is the mark number; in general earth mark numbers are generally small, and light mark numbers would generally be larger; momentum abilities are rewritten to be considered an Earth ability, although current uses (often in gravity creatures) and costs can remain the same.
• Gravity: a creature with a gravity mark is considered to have 'gravity pull', in that incoming creature attack damage are applied against the creature's health before the player's hp bar; as well, a creature with a gravity mark has +0/+x, where x is the mark number; existing gravity pull graphic of a shield icon in the top right corner of the card is discarded
• Water: a creature or permanent with a water mark is considered 'frozen' for x turns, ie, unable to attack or use abilities, where x is the mark number; a player's hp bar with a water mark means that player cannot play spells for x turns (but can play permanents and creatures as normal), water mark numbers for the player should almost never be more than 1; Freeze spell and Arctic Squid ability would be rewritten to apply water marks with appropriate numbers; Purify spell would be rewritten to remove a mark applied to any targeted card or hp bar; I would suggest removing the current triangular ice glacier graphic from frozen creatures, although I can see
• Fire: a creature with a fire mark has +x/-x, where x is the mark number; optionally, when a fire mark is removed from a creature, or a creature with a fire mark dies, that creature's player gets 1 or possibly more fire quantums (to fit the model of immolation).
  
• Air: a creature with an air mark has +x/+0, where x is the mark number; air marks remove themselves at the end of turn; Dive abilities are rewritten to apply an air mark with a mark number that is equal to the creature's power (possibly before the air mark is applied, in order to double on existing marks like a light mark'ed Blessing before the light mark is removed by the new air mark).

In a way, this kind of system would be more complicated to understand than what is in the game now.  However, it would hypothetically benefit from a concentrated structure and graphic scheme that can help flatten the learning curve, and it would reinforce the themes of elements and elemental marks which can assist players to develop positive play intuition.

One last hypothetical suggestion that comes to mind.  Shard cards might be useful in this system if they were given a 0-cost ability to sacrifice themselves (as a Virus might) to remove a single mark from a card in play or on a player hp bar.  Even marks on immaterial or otherwise untargetable cards.  This kind of ability seems to somewhat fit the concept of Shard cards being generally of no concentrated use without leaving them to be completely useless.

Anyway, just a suggestion...

3

Game Suggestions and Feedback / Game mechanic suggestion: quantum caps

« on: December 15, 2009, 10:09:52 pm »

Short form: Introduce quantum pool caps to better limit pooling up infinite quantums during games.  I suggest a scheme of tying quantum capacity to cards in play so that, roughly, the more cards in play, the higher the caps.

Long form:

I'm enjoying Elements a lot.  But I find one weakness of the environment is a lack of quantum caps.  Many unintelligent decks can be made by simply loading up the quantum pillars and the best cards of every element.  There's no fear of not having the right quantums to play any card.  And thus there's almost no reason to play a dedicated 2 or 3 element deck, and only a few weak reasons to play a concentrated single element deck.

I suggest that a new mechanic be introduced to cap the quantum pools during play.  Such a cap can take on many forms.  One simplistic example: If, at the end of a player's turn, that player has more than 10 quantums in any one elemental pool, that pool is reduced to exactly 10 quantums.

I would prefer a more dynamic cap scheme than that, so I suggest this:

• each individual element has a separate cap value, and the pool is displayed in a 'x/y' form, where x is the current number of quantums for that player in that element's pool, and y is the current cap value for that element's pool
• each creature in play for a player raises that player's cap for that element's pool by the creature's quantum cost (an Otyugh in play raises the gravity cap by 3)
• each elemental (non-quantum) pillar in play raises the cap for that element's pool by 1 (if not upgraded) or by 2 (if upgraded)
• each elemental permanent in play raises the cap for that element's pool by 1 (if not upgraded) or by 2 (if upgraded)
• each quantum pillar or non-element-specific permanent or creature in play, upgraded or not, protects 3 extra quantums at random from being removed at end of turn
• the player's mark raises the cap for that element's pool by 2, and for all other elements by 1 (false gods thus get 6 and 3)
• at end of turn, after all attacks but before quantum generation, all elemental pools over current cap levels are reduced to their cap levels, (followed by adding quantums back generated by pillars, which allows for a few extra quantums over the cap to carry forward to the next turn).

This scheme hypothetically encourages players to concentrate their elements more, to consider tactics focusing more on quantum efficiency, while still allowing some flexibility to play off-element cards.  It also hypothetically encourages new value for playing smaller cost, less-gamebreaking cards (to raise caps towards having capacity to play the bigger cards).  I have hopes that this scheme might be enough to help spread out the kinds of decks that can work and that can take on top 50 and level 6 decks, without hamstringing the ai too much.  However, obviously this is all just speculation at this point.

The cardbase would probably have to be rebalanced for a scheme such as this as well.  Possibly, many cards might have to be reduced in cost by 1 in order to make them more viable for off-element play.

One major weakness of this kind of scheme is that there's a bit of a harsh curve for players to learn it.  One of Elements' strengths is it's very simple play mechanics, and a scheme like this undermines that.

Anyway, just a suggestion...