Guest posts by hermantheowl

37

Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?

« on: August 10, 2010, 05:43:54 am »

. If using the origional version you could replace the queen with a nymph. I't not part of a combo (queen is) and it can be used instead of lava destroyer in some situation. Keep hte destroyers. YOu can play either quinted first depending on the situation. REflective shield (IE: JAde shield) makes nymph usleless and is gasses can be destroyed. It also needs more quanta to get going. It can win the game on its own though. You could also use it instead of a third destroyer (no queen). It helps but I find extra defense more useful. Things like aflatoxin, protect artifact, and jade shield (vs decay and octane) can be more useful than extra damage.  YOu could put an Air nymph in if there's room. I beat destiny by copying its air nymph (from fate egg) with fractal and using it on them (with quint on it).  I have not tested with nymph much, it might work if you can find room. (35 cards max unless you ahve more than 2 hourglasses) I find it amusing.

38

Farming Studies and Statistics / Re: Turns to win study

« on: August 09, 2010, 09:53:18 pm »

I'm up to 75 games in my test. (it is in a earleir post) I wanted to see how much faster upgrades make decks. I took a lava golem deck  and upgraded Immolation, Lava Golem, and pillars.

39

Farming Studies and Statistics / Re: Turns to win study

« on: August 08, 2010, 08:58:20 pm »

Fire Lava Destroyer Rush "verision 0.5" (you can build it before you have enough upgrades for "Fire Lava Destroyer Rush Version 2" from the ttw study list)
-Upgraded verion of an unupped lava golem t50 deck
-no changes except upgrades
-gradually upgraded from an upupped one (Immolation, then golems, then pillars)

Code: [Select]

5f2 5f2 5f6 5f6 5f6 5fb 5fb 5l9 5l9 5l9 5l9 5l9 5l9 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq

Total so far:
75 games
Wins 73
losses 2
average turns to win: 6.342


detailed stats:
total:
turns to win
4: 6
5: 14
6: 26
7: 17
8: 4
9: 3
10: 1
11: 3

average
6.342 ttw


Will do 25 at a time.
vs AI 3
round 1:
Wins 24
Losses 1 (2 stupid miracles at least 13 turns)


ttw
5:8
6:9
7:6
9:1
11:1

average: 6.5

Round 2
Wins 24
Losses 1 (stupid entropy darkenss, 7ish turns)

ttw
4: 4
5: 2
6: 10
7: 4
8: 2
9: 1
11: 1

average 6.25

round 3:
wins 25
losses 0

ttw
4: 2
5: 4
6: 7
7: 7
8: 2
9: 1
10: 1
11: 1

average ttw 6.28



Not sure if I did the average right. Did not included turrns taken in games I lost. Divided by number of games won.

40

Farming Studies and Statistics / Re: Turns to win study

« on: August 08, 2010, 07:25:22 pm »

I'm going to test this:

Code: [Select]

5f2 5f2 5f6 5f6 5f6 5fb 5fb 5l9 5l9 5l9 5l9 5l9 5l9 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq
Meant for top 50.
BAsed on unupped fire lava golems, similar to vreeley's deck. Picked this version for the extra Rage potion. Just took a beginner freindly lava golem deck upgraded it. Do I play at least 25 games vs AI3 or at least 50 games vs AI3?

41

Farming Studies and Statistics / Re: Turns to win study

« on: August 08, 2010, 06:51:34 pm »

What format are these decks for? (pvp or t50 or AI3?)

42

Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?

« on: July 28, 2010, 04:20:51 am »

Using this version. Went with a version with Aflatoxin. Sometimes one Aflatoxin is a Miracle. Testing that.

Code: [Select]

6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u7 6u7 71c 71c 77f 77f 77i 7dq 7dq 7gp 7gp 7q5 7q5 80h 80h 80i
 

43

Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?

« on: July 26, 2010, 10:42:59 pm »

In a game agaisnt Desity I copeid an air nymph (fractal), quinted it and won with unstable gass.

44

Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?

« on: July 26, 2010, 06:22:38 pm »

Puffer Fish is going to have a higher attack so Scorpio and Elidnis will be harder (permafrost shield won't stop it anymore).

45

Nerf This Card! / Re: Black Hole | Black Hole

« on: July 26, 2010, 04:35:59 am »

Remove the life gain but keep the effect?

46

Rainbow Decks / Re: Yaladilae's Butterfly Angel (v1.21)

« on: July 26, 2010, 12:18:20 am »

This deck has 8 towers and other popular small entropy rainbows with supernovas (35 cards max) I've seen have 7. (CC, why bother? and the one invented by Puppy chow). When do you need an extra tower in this kind of deck? IS this because of 3 quintessences? I saw just 2 of's or less of everything (not counting shards). Or is it becaue this deck is slower (less creatures) so it needs a better start?

47

Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?

« on: July 26, 2010, 12:13:21 am »

When I faced dark matter he got 2 gravity nymphs! 

48

Forum Archive / Re: Hardest t50 deck to play against?

« on: July 25, 2010, 11:20:39 pm »

MAybe its really hard to beat it without rushing like crazy. Some decks are impossible for certain decks.  Anti-Lord's deck (Flying Eagle's Eye/fog shield/SOG/dragons) drove me crazy when I decied to skip permanent control.