Guest posts by gavsword

25

Role-Playing / Re: Rise of the Elementals

« on: June 01, 2011, 01:00:00 pm »

Quick poll for teammates, 3rd shield or fight the general?

26

Role-Playing / Re: Rise of the Elementals

« on: May 31, 2011, 04:04:18 pm »

I'll buy another shield

27

Forum Game Archive / Re: Elements Mafia 20 - Hosted by RavingRabbid

« on: May 31, 2011, 03:33:54 pm »

W/e probably figured I was gonna be lynched by the mob soon anyway. I kinda looked like mafia if anyone actually reads my posts....

Oh wait I mean NOOOOOOOOOO I'M DEAD!!!!!

28

General Discussion / Re: Stall deck sizes

« on: May 31, 2011, 12:32:48 pm »

If I pack an offensive out in the deck (ie, firestall) I traditionally go with around 34 or 35 cards. If I need more slots for removal, or if decking out is my main method of winning, then 40+ is used more often. I rarely use 60, but I will often if I am afraid the other person is playing a potentially disastrous stall.

29

Round 8 / Re: (Underworld) Lt. Sevs 2 - 1 Gen. Napalm Grenade (Fire)

« on: May 31, 2011, 02:47:58 am »

Good game napalm, you fought the best you could. RNG took it out of our hands, not Sevs playing. This was a fine deck from UW, but still RNG controls more fate. And frankly it really pisses me off that sevs is acting like it was all him.

I would say you probably brought a ~B game B+ would have done it

This is the comment of an ass. Napalm played the game as well as she could. These were not misplays that gave sevs the match, it was luck. If he doesn't draw the 2nd shrieker, doesn't top deck the pande, the pande doesn't kill 6/8 phoenixes and TU the living ones, then we would be talking about how napalm is still undefeated. Get off your high horse, you fought well enough for the win, but stop acting like Napalm didn't.

I'm sorry for the rage, but sevs comments have just pissed me off. I mean nothing against sevs as a player or person, or to anyone else on UW for that matter, but please acknowledge when luck beats skill, and not just in the after comments.

30

Forum Game Archive / Re: Elements Mafia 20 - Hosted by RavingRabbid

« on: May 30, 2011, 07:20:13 pm »

918273645 - 2 (majofa, TheForbiddenOracle)
ShiningSword - 7 (RootRanger, patchx94, Seraph, Shantu, Onizuka, ddevans96, gavsword)
Wardead - 1 (Nepycros)
QuantumT - 1 (Korugar)

31

Role-Playing / Re: Rise of the Elementals

« on: May 30, 2011, 05:17:07 pm »

Shield, goblin, then...... I'm not sure.

32

Post Your PvP Event Ideas Here / Re: The Ultimate SHUT!

« on: May 30, 2011, 02:02:57 pm »

If we switched rounds from 4 days to 3 days do you think that would be a problem?  That change alone should shave close to a week off the event length.

No, it shouldn't. I'll change it now

EDIT: Done.

33

Off-Topic Discussions / Re: Special Powers!

« on: May 29, 2011, 11:35:04 pm »

Ok, though that makes me nearly impossible to hurt Btw, I'm at my max item amount, so any leftover items from our past alliance can't go to me, gavs.

Okay, Camoninja still has first pick, then flayne

34

Budokan / Re: Stage II: Part I - The Culling ROUND 2

« on: May 29, 2011, 11:32:59 pm »

That's in the top-8 tourney

Also, no wins, still not dead!

35

Role-Playing / Re: Rise of the Elementals

« on: May 29, 2011, 09:33:57 pm »

Sorry everyone, I PM'd majofa twice asking him for info, but he said to find him on chat and I havent been able to

EDIT: Found him

EDIT AGAIN: Done

36

Forum Game Archive / Re: Elements Mafia 20 - Hosted by RavingRabbid

« on: May 28, 2011, 07:06:39 pm »

Shiningsword

LOL at the weapons. A sniper as first choice, and a lava golem as second(that means we are looking for a rainbow-ish guy, but the lava must have been borrowed from hermes).
I hope the ''Sniper'' was an Owls eye, or the elements relation just got a little torn apart.

Legit pretty much teased them(saying you have information is a good way of teasing a not too smart FG) last round, i bet he knew that he wasnt going to last a lot.

No, this doesn't mean that either Korugar or Majofa are confirmed civs, and this line does not mean they're both FGs. They were just picked because in my list they were next to Legit.

The first line means that one of them is an FG, i speculate(otherwise he wouldnt put anything like this, i think, considering most people know that this kind of story involvement doesnt mean anything).
Now, who wants to guess which one?

OK, I'll guess one.
Shiningsword - 1 (Gavsword)
You've played enough mafia's to know the story means nothing.

Alien

T, was that a random vote or do you have reasoning behind it?  Oh, and:
Shiningsword - 14 (Gavsword, RootRanger, ddevans96, Shantu, vinvick3714, Nepycros, an alien, patchx94, EvaRia, Onizuka, TheForbiddenOracle, jippy99)
an alien - 1 (TStar)

No reason in particular really.  I have no proof of anything or solid evidence.  He's just too inconsistent for me, and whether that makes him a Civilian or FG I'd rather not have someone I don't feel can be dependable around any longer than possible.  My reasons for feeling this way:

Post 1 (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,26590.msg364254#msg364254)
* Joins the 1world bandwagon.  Nothing wrong with that really and so far bandwagoning seems the norm.
Post 2 (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,26590.msg364416#msg364416)
* Switches his vote to 918273645 for no reason I can see other than Legit posting that 1world is innocent.  While that was indeed true, it concerns me that he would so quickly trust someone elses unconfirmed statement.  It's doubly odd that he not only switched his vote, but switched it to the player with the 2nd highest vote total at the time almost like he was trying to save 1world. (I'm sorry if that's considered metagaming and I'll stop if it is still not 100% clear on what is or isn't).
Post 3 (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,26590.msg365339#msg365339)
* Round 2 he hops on the bandwagon again.  Again nothing really wrong with that.
Post 4 (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,26590.msg365561#msg365561)
* Basically tells SS that early on lynching random people is fine and that SS has no proof of his claims so why would anyone listen to him.

So in Round 1, Legit's unconfirmed claim that 1world was innocent was proof enough for him to change his vote but now in Round 2 when SS makes unconfirmed claims he comes out and says that's not enough for people to listen to?  I don't know, it just seems way too inconsistent to me and I think anyone who is that easily swayed in one round and then inconsistent in the next is just too dangerous to have as an ally.

Again, I have NO proof at all that he is either a Civilian or False God.  I'm just voting for someone who I think would be a weak link as an ally.  I'm probably reading way too much into this and I don't really expect anyone else to believe me or trust me or vote for anyone based on my observations, nor am I asking anyone to.

Shiningsword - 8 (RootRanger, Shantu, vinvick3714, Nepycros, an alien, patchx94, EvaRia, jippy99)
an alien - 7 (TStar, Genuinous, nilsieboy, ddevans96, Onizuka, TheForbiddenOracle, Gavsword)

Again, my vote for shining was just because he should know better. TStar presents better evidence then mine against alien. Also it feels like one new player is ALWAYS mafia.