13
Deck Help / Re: Defence over offence
« on: January 29, 2012, 12:30:03 am »
So no more then 45 then?
And this deck does no good against FG?
And this deck does no good against FG?
Guest Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
14
Deck Help / Re: Defence over offence
« on: January 29, 2012, 12:16:07 am »
So how many cards do you think I should have? Keep with a low number (say 31-35) or medium (40-50) or even push towards the 60 mark?
15
Deck Help / Defence over offence
« on: January 28, 2012, 11:00:36 pm »
Four decks that differ quite a bit from the ordinary deck is that its focus is defence first in order to minimize damage. But the thing because of its low attacking power. I'm very likely to deck out. So I'm not just looking for suggestions as to how to improve the decks, but also whenever or not people think I should use more then 30 cards in the deck in order to fit more power into it and well as reduce the chance of decking out.
16
Deck Help / Re: Light-Air Against FG
« on: January 28, 2012, 10:57:12 pm »
... And if it isn't against a FG deck?
17
Deck Help / Re: Light-Air Against FG
« on: January 28, 2012, 05:53:37 pm »Light-Air as it is presented simply does not provide a viable FG-killer.I know I know. Its a shame but I know...
18
Deck Help / Re: Light-Air Against FG
« on: January 28, 2012, 05:51:18 pm »
How about now its been edited?
19
Deck Help / Re: Light-Air Against FG
« on: January 28, 2012, 05:43:59 pm »
I took that into account as well.
Momentum, Airborne, direct spells, Ranged and PC where all taken into account.
Momentum, Airborne, direct spells, Ranged and PC where all taken into account.
20
Deck Help / Re: Light-Air Against FG
« on: January 28, 2012, 05:41:50 pm »
PC?
No I took Momentum into account with those calculations. Admittedly they are not completely accurate but they are quite accurate as they are.
No I took Momentum into account with those calculations. Admittedly they are not completely accurate but they are quite accurate as they are.
21
Deck Help / Re: Light-Air Against FG
« on: January 28, 2012, 05:36:32 pm »
Akebono 4 out of 33, 12% of cards can get past Wings
Chaos Lord 4 out of 53, 8%
Destiny . 0 ways past Wings.
Dream Catcher. 3 out of 38. 7%
Gemini 5/45. 11%
Hecate. 2 on their own out of 33. 6%
Incarnate. 10/43 23%
Jezebel. 6/34 17%
Lionheart 2/40. 5%
Neptune 9/37/ 24%
Obliterator 9/47 19%
Paradox 8/50 16%
Rainbow 11/60 18%
Scorpio 7/54 13%
Seism 9/46 20%
Serket 0 ways to get past wings.
Chaos Lord 4 out of 53, 8%
Destiny . 0 ways past Wings.
Dream Catcher. 3 out of 38. 7%
Gemini 5/45. 11%
Hecate. 2 on their own out of 33. 6%
Incarnate. 10/43 23%
Jezebel. 6/34 17%
Lionheart 2/40. 5%
Neptune 9/37/ 24%
Obliterator 9/47 19%
Paradox 8/50 16%
Rainbow 11/60 18%
Scorpio 7/54 13%
Seism 9/46 20%
Serket 0 ways to get past wings.
22
Deck Help / Re: Light-Air Against FG
« on: January 28, 2012, 05:07:59 pm »
Of course I still posted that. As it is completely true!
They can get back the Wings, I'm not denying that. But against some of them the Wings are a very good defence.
They can get back the Wings, I'm not denying that. But against some of them the Wings are a very good defence.
23
Deck Help / Re: Light-Air Against FG
« on: January 28, 2012, 05:01:20 pm »
I had a look myself you know, you don't need to list everything!
24
Deck Help / Re: Light-Air Against FG
« on: January 28, 2012, 04:38:28 pm »
Some of them may have means of getting past the shields, but they are far and few between...