25
Humor / Re: One of our members is hacking again!!!
« on: April 04, 2011, 01:08:27 am »
Who dose [you] think they are telling people when a thread is dead. [you] is a control freak.
Guest Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
26
Humor / Re: I'm the best elements player!!!
« on: April 04, 2011, 12:19:03 am »
Yeah checked into that. That actually seems right up my alley.
27
Humor / Re: I'm the best elements player!!!
« on: April 03, 2011, 10:23:52 pm »
Oh it's on like donkey kong then.
What's woar btw?
What's woar btw?
28
Politics / Re: The US should RAISE taxes
« on: April 03, 2011, 09:50:00 pm »Google Ron Paul.That guy is likely a total scam artists politician.
He has some simple but excellent ideas.
1. Reduce the size of government
2. Less taxes, as cost of operating government is less
3. Less government interference, and let the free market sort itself out.
4. Less meddling in other country's squabbles, and mind your own business. The American military expense is bleeding taxpayers dry.
Quite an eyeopener.
1) I highly doubt he will reduce government size. (If he dose it's to increase control)
2) Is clearly a ploy to get lower tax sentiment. It's so believable though because of 1. What a great politician.
3) Terrible idea. Hidden behind another ploy/suggestion that less government interfence is good. This is going to help big buisiness... so will lower taxes by the way. This guy must be a republican.
4) http://www.cdi.org/issues/milspend.html That is a list of military spending for the usa from 1945 to 1996. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_expenditures
So, maybe we can't blame our poor economy entirely on the war. Maybe it's just a normal economic down turn. Seriously. Consider how much the media thrives off hype and how ill informed most the population is. 4 sounds like just another political ploy to play off all the media hype.
I wonder why no politicians mention the "all out war" on drugs we've been losing. Seriously. That's just an example because there are more drug users now than when the war started and we are spending more and more on it. Basically, because politicians have to do what the media wants them to or they don't win. Beware of this and if your not fully informed please don't vote. Not voting is a good thing. The media want's the average person to vote and will say everyone "should" vote but they only say this because they can control and utterly influence the average person.
Anyways, I'm not an economics major and probably don't deserve an opinion on rather or not to raise taxes. Economics isn't a subject that is as common sense as politics. I'm kinda weird like that. My best guess though would be to raise taxes because Ron Paul wants to lower them.
29
Politics / Re: What should we do if WWIII breaks out?
« on: April 03, 2011, 12:41:09 pm »
The most important thing is bringing the fight to your enemy.
Strategic points are obviously places like the pentagon or other military intelligence locations but really what wins wars is some combination of troops and technology which I will just summarize as troops. Troops/Strength trumps intelligence. Intelligence can only amplify strength. I would consider the pentagon as more of a shock and awe and disorientation tactic.
Anyways, the core of troop counts comes from 1) economy 2) production.
We're in the middle east likely trying to control their production. We don't want to hurt their economy because we want to leave whatever resources we can to make it worth while. It's also possible we save money by having troops there because we are "bringing the fight to your enemy." When the enemy brings the fight to you, you lose things like the world trade center or Pearl Harbour.
Our economy was attacked because we're a military powerhouse. Our production locations can't be controlled. But our production can be slowed via economy attacks.
Attacking both economy and production is counter productive initially because if there isn't money for our war factories to produce theres no point in attacking them.
This leads me to my next point. A major attack on the USA, possibly, would be in a major resource area. Coal, Iron, Gold, a building comparable to the world trade center, etc, to continue the assault on our economy. This is just my opinion and I am by no means a trained military expert. Certaintly an attack on an intelligence location is also viable.
Anyways, this is my opinion on what locations could be consider more dangerous than others if your worried about a strike on the USA.
---------------------------------
In regards to WW3 if it ever happens it probably won't be spearheaded by middle eastern leadership.
-----------------------------------
EMP burst: Electromagnetic Pulse burst. What it dose in a nutshell is damage electrical components. Basically its a burst of EM radiation that cause irregular voltage spikes in electrical circuits. I'm not an expert on the subject though.
I do know a bit about electricity though. Basically an increase in voltage means an increase in amps which is what damages things but almost everything should be protected by fuses that burn out at a certain amperage. So it's not impossible that an EMP burst could be fixed simply by replacing some fuses. Once again I'm not an expert on the subject. Worst case scenario stay as low profile as possible.
BTW I would think an EMP burst would be the precursor to something worse. I just don't have the knowledge or capability right now to explain why. It would seem to me it would knock out defenses for a WMD or communcation to defend against an invasion but I'm not sure how that works.
---------------------------------
If unsure, boil water. There are also water treatment packets. Don't know a ton about them though. It should also be noted we get most of our water from the food we eat. If your worried about food consult a survival book about what bugs and plants are edible. This will supplement your canned food rations to make them stretch.
-----------------------------
And that's pretty much all I know on the subject. I'm pretty much always up for some C&C btw.
Strategic points are obviously places like the pentagon or other military intelligence locations but really what wins wars is some combination of troops and technology which I will just summarize as troops. Troops/Strength trumps intelligence. Intelligence can only amplify strength. I would consider the pentagon as more of a shock and awe and disorientation tactic.
Anyways, the core of troop counts comes from 1) economy 2) production.
We're in the middle east likely trying to control their production. We don't want to hurt their economy because we want to leave whatever resources we can to make it worth while. It's also possible we save money by having troops there because we are "bringing the fight to your enemy." When the enemy brings the fight to you, you lose things like the world trade center or Pearl Harbour.
Our economy was attacked because we're a military powerhouse. Our production locations can't be controlled. But our production can be slowed via economy attacks.
Attacking both economy and production is counter productive initially because if there isn't money for our war factories to produce theres no point in attacking them.
This leads me to my next point. A major attack on the USA, possibly, would be in a major resource area. Coal, Iron, Gold, a building comparable to the world trade center, etc, to continue the assault on our economy. This is just my opinion and I am by no means a trained military expert. Certaintly an attack on an intelligence location is also viable.
Anyways, this is my opinion on what locations could be consider more dangerous than others if your worried about a strike on the USA.
---------------------------------
In regards to WW3 if it ever happens it probably won't be spearheaded by middle eastern leadership.
-----------------------------------
EMP burst: Electromagnetic Pulse burst. What it dose in a nutshell is damage electrical components. Basically its a burst of EM radiation that cause irregular voltage spikes in electrical circuits. I'm not an expert on the subject though.
I do know a bit about electricity though. Basically an increase in voltage means an increase in amps which is what damages things but almost everything should be protected by fuses that burn out at a certain amperage. So it's not impossible that an EMP burst could be fixed simply by replacing some fuses. Once again I'm not an expert on the subject. Worst case scenario stay as low profile as possible.
BTW I would think an EMP burst would be the precursor to something worse. I just don't have the knowledge or capability right now to explain why. It would seem to me it would knock out defenses for a WMD or communcation to defend against an invasion but I'm not sure how that works.
---------------------------------
If unsure, boil water. There are also water treatment packets. Don't know a ton about them though. It should also be noted we get most of our water from the food we eat. If your worried about food consult a survival book about what bugs and plants are edible. This will supplement your canned food rations to make them stretch.
-----------------------------
And that's pretty much all I know on the subject. I'm pretty much always up for some C&C btw.
30
Humor / Re: I'm the best elements player!!!
« on: April 03, 2011, 11:15:53 am »
I'm clearly the best....
and that opinion is based off nothing.
and that opinion is based off nothing.
31
Humor / Re: Beat Chuck Norris
« on: April 03, 2011, 10:26:57 am »Chuck Norris destroys Walker Texas Ranger before you and gains a level during the destruction not only beating you at your own game but increasing his strength past the need for fame.ya know i hate you but i can somehow get through this. how about i destroy walker texas ranger which destroys his fame destroys chuck norris jokes which makes him weak and i use PK STARSTORMChuck Norris Is immaterial and cant be targeted by spellsRemember this? lol
Then Chuck Norris becomes infintely more famous anyways for not only mastering PK Starstorm but improving upon it. He is so famous now all cities, towns, states, countries and women are named Chuck.
32
Deck Help / Re: Air Rush for Pvp1 :D
« on: April 02, 2011, 11:43:49 am »
The faster deck will probably be the better AI3 grinder.
Too much generation on the second deck.
First deck dosn't need pendulums. The fire mark is enough.
I should also mention just exchanging deflags for generation and switching your mark is definetly going to speed up your deck. That's why your second deck seemed so much faster.
Too many dragonflies. Your being greedy over their 1 damage and you can easily lose some consistency for it. Maybe that's why you have so many other generators in the second deck. Keep in mind dragonflies not only cost 1 more
than a pillar, they cost 2 more on the first turn and any other turn if you don't have the qaunta to play them.
Sky Blitz is really expensive and IMO ineffective in these decks.
Air isn't a great rush deck. Try building a life rush and you'll notice a huge difference.
Too much generation on the second deck.
First deck dosn't need pendulums. The fire mark is enough.
I should also mention just exchanging deflags for generation and switching your mark is definetly going to speed up your deck. That's why your second deck seemed so much faster.
Too many dragonflies. Your being greedy over their 1 damage and you can easily lose some consistency for it. Maybe that's why you have so many other generators in the second deck. Keep in mind dragonflies not only cost 1 more
than a pillar, they cost 2 more on the first turn and any other turn if you don't have the qaunta to play them.Sky Blitz is really expensive and IMO ineffective in these decks.
Air isn't a great rush deck. Try building a life rush and you'll notice a huge difference.
33
Duo-Decks / Re: Air Density Measurement and Control (unupped)
« on: March 30, 2011, 08:45:34 am »
Thanks for fixing it.
I like adding 1 card to my decks occasionally. A lot of people don't though. Then again most people would use 6 titans and 5 flying weapons. Anyways I like the idea of adding a second accelerator.
I could definetly see adding 1 more accelerator and making the deck 31 cards. That's probably the better choice. Especially for the otyughs. Oh and I also like making some decks 31 cards.
I actually think the main problem with the deck is getting the otyughs doing what they're supposed to. Creatures between 3-4 life are unreachable to my otyughs and are killed by the shockwaves (still making my otyughs useless) and it's really the weak spot in my deck. Unfortunately, 3-4 life is very common for rush decks. So I can only say this deck is, good, wins more than it's fair share of pvp games but ultimately still is under construction. Thanks for the advice. I'll post more when I get it done.
I like adding 1 card to my decks occasionally. A lot of people don't though. Then again most people would use 6 titans and 5 flying weapons. Anyways I like the idea of adding a second accelerator.
I could definetly see adding 1 more accelerator and making the deck 31 cards. That's probably the better choice. Especially for the otyughs. Oh and I also like making some decks 31 cards.
I actually think the main problem with the deck is getting the otyughs doing what they're supposed to. Creatures between 3-4 life are unreachable to my otyughs and are killed by the shockwaves (still making my otyughs useless) and it's really the weak spot in my deck. Unfortunately, 3-4 life is very common for rush decks. So I can only say this deck is, good, wins more than it's fair share of pvp games but ultimately still is under construction. Thanks for the advice. I'll post more when I get it done.
34
Issue Archive / Re: Mind Flayer not removing obsession.
« on: March 27, 2011, 06:18:56 am »
It removes momentum and adrenaline though.
I suppose the difference is both of those abilities add marks on the card, they're still passive though.
I suppose the difference is both of those abilities add marks on the card, they're still passive though.
35
Issue Archive / Re: Mind Flayer not removing obsession.
« on: March 27, 2011, 06:10:25 am »
Obsession is the ability on Ghost of the Past. Meaning discard this card recieve 10 damage.
36
Issue Archive / Mind Flayer not removing obsession.
« on: March 27, 2011, 06:06:40 am »
Mind flayer dosn't remove obsession. Either it's a game bug or a wording bug but mind flayer dose say, "remove any skill from the target creature."