Guest Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - WrekX (38)

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
1
Duo-Decks / Re: The Mother of All Bombs (unupped) (Fire/Air)
« on: February 25, 2012, 07:42:00 am »
Lol, yeah, but if it was an unstable gas deck it wouldn't be worth mentioning unless you had a nymph maybe, idk, I don't have one.  :P It's just a reference to the air/fuel bomb.


Made some changes. In the top, I took a dragon out for a pillar, then I took the advice of calindu and made this. It's still my opinion that phoenix was made for reclamation so it's a mix of his advice and my opinion.

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink
Deck import code : [Select]
5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f2 5f2 5f2 5f2 5f4 5f4 5f4 5f6 5f6 5f7 5fc 5fc 5fc 5fc 5og 5og 5on 5on 5on 8pr

2
Duo-Decks / The Mother of All Bombs (unupped) (Fire/Air)
« on: February 25, 2012, 07:18:36 am »
This is one of my favorite pvp decks right now. It always feels good in my hands. Probably not a new concept but then again there probably aren't many new concepts in the first place.  :fire :air

I hope you like it.

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink
Deck import code : [Select]
5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f2 5f2 5f2 5f2 5f2 5f4 5f4 5f4 5f6 5f6 5f7 5fc 5fc 5og 5og 5on 5on 5on 8pr

3
FG Proposals / Re: Kiln
« on: February 20, 2012, 11:22:57 pm »
I just kinda stumbled in here, not normally my thing but I liked the name.


I would make the following changes:

2 Rage Elixers for 2 Fire Nymphs
1 Explosion for 1 Fire Shield
1 Explosion for 1 Fire Storm
1 Quicksand for 1 Gavel
2 Quicksand for 2 Protect Artifact



I think this would be a more exciting FG. Ok, lol. Thanks.

4
Forum Archive / Re: Join as an Apprentice
« on: July 16, 2011, 05:25:34 am »
Hi, I'm time slot 5. Gmt -8.


I need help understanding the forum games. WoE and all that stuff.

5
Humor / Re: Beat Chuck Norris
« on: April 16, 2011, 09:26:25 am »
Quote from: nerd1 on April 14, 2011, 01:48:48 am
i summon 0.5 of a chuck norris. because chuck norris can beat two of himself, it stands to reason that half a chuck norris could beat four of himself, and as i am facing a chuck norris, my chuck norris will be three times as good as your chuck norris.
here's to not getting math!!!
It's not that the math is wrong it's that you could never have a Chuck Norris.

6
Religion / Re: Pascal's Wager
« on: April 16, 2011, 09:07:13 am »
Quote from: Jenkar on April 14, 2011, 08:18:01 am
Quote from: WrekX on April 14, 2011, 07:27:22 am
Infinite posibility:  
God is not realGod is real
BelieveHappiness gain=0Happiness gain=infinite, or 0, or negative infinte
Not BelieveHappiness gain=0Happiness gain=infinite, or 0, or negative infinte
Pascals Wager:
God is not realGod is real
BelieveHappiness gain=0Happiness gain=infinite
Not BelieveHappiness gain=0Happiness gain=negative infinte
You're assuming that there is only one possibility of god, that either rewards, does not care, or punishes belief?
No, I assume happiness and sadness is measureable. Therefore if for some reason there was a god that both punishes and rewards his believers happiness would still be gained, lost or 0.

 I suppose changing it to "=infinite, or positive, or 0, or negative, or negaitve infinite" would be more accurate because providing the simple "positive and negative" removes the assumption that whatever happens in the afterlife would be permanent.

Thanks for pointing that out. (even if indirectly so)

Infinite posibility:
God is not realGod is real
BelieveHappiness gain=0Happiness gain=infinite, or positive, or 0, or negative, or negative infinte
Not BelieveHappiness gain=0Happiness gain=infinite, or positive, or 0, or negative, negative infinte
Pascals Wager:
God is not realGod is real
BelieveHappiness gain=0Happiness gain=infinite
Not BelieveHappiness gain=0Happiness gain=negative infinte

7
Politics / Re: The Two-Party System
« on: April 16, 2011, 08:34:43 am »
Quote from: Neopergoss on April 16, 2011, 08:14:47 am
Quote from: WrekX on April 16, 2011, 04:56:51 am
I would find it grossly offensive if someone wasn't willing to vote for another party.

A 2 party system where the parties won't work together is a 2 party system that won't work. This by extension go's to all parties.
If you ask me, the 2 parties are working together far too much to support the policies that favor their lobbyists and not the country. Lack of bipartisanship is a beltway myth.
Way to miss the point to sound smart.

8
Politics / Re: The Two-Party System
« on: April 16, 2011, 04:56:51 am »
I would find it grossly offensive if someone wasn't willing to vote for another party.

A 2 party system where the parties won't work together is a 2 party system that won't work. This by extension go's to all parties.

9
Politics / I'm loving Obama.
« on: April 16, 2011, 04:38:27 am »
http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_theticket/20110415/ts_yblog_theticket/obama-caught-on-audio-slamming-gop

ROTF. Stick it to the nazis!

10
Religion / Re: Pascal's Wager
« on: April 14, 2011, 07:27:22 am »
Infinite posibility:
God is not realGod is real
BelieveHappiness gain=0Happiness gain=infinite, or 0, or negative infinte
Not BelieveHappiness gain=0Happiness gain=infinite, or 0, or negative infinte
Pascals Wager:
God is not realGod is real
BelieveHappiness gain=0Happiness gain=infinite
Not BelieveHappiness gain=0Happiness gain=negative infinte

11
Trio & Quartet / Re: 2 rares, 2 upgrades: a DUO FG Killer for the Masses. Updated 22-3-11
« on: April 09, 2011, 07:46:33 am »
I don't reccomend this deck.

12
Religion / Re: Pascal's Wager
« on: April 08, 2011, 10:55:35 pm »
^^^^^

It's disproven because under "god exists" there should be "infinity and -infinity". (see below)


God Doesn't ExistGod Exists
Theist0Infinity & (-Infinity)
Atheist0Infinity & (-Infinity)
^^^^ Because you have to prove that god only rewards it's believers and punishes non-believers.  What if god punishes it's believers in the after life? What god only rewards atheists? What if god punishes everyone? What if god rewards everyone? Regardless of how unlikely you may feel these are you must logicialy disprove every other possibility of gods rewards and punishments.  Pascals wager is disproven until then.

Keep in mind, pascals wager works great on a biblical basis because you've been given the image of god. However, an atheist has no image of god. A god could be anything and your partially assuming your religion is the only religion that is right.

Your also assuming that a right religion has been created. Thus, if you stop assuming that the right religion has been created, there could be a god that rewards atheism and self sufficiency and punishes theism. No one would know this religion because it rewards atheism. See how that works? No one would know about this god because because it has no believers. Just that example of a different religion with a completely different god completely inverts pascals wager making both squares under "god exists" "Infinity & (-Infinity)"

------------------------------------------

Once again, however unlikely these scenarios, logically you can't prove pascals wager. However, I think we have missed a very important philosophical message. (Even if it is a blunder?) Perhaps we should place a bet. I've always gone from soft christian to soft atheist. Maybe it's wise to make a decision. Because if i'm part soft christian I may lose favour with the god that rewards atheism.

Edit: I just realized there's a possibility of a god who rewards people who don't make up their minds. Darn logic.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
blarg: WrekX