Guest Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - TkG Anubis (27)

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
Fire / Re: AI3 grinding deck
« on: October 04, 2010, 01:44:11 pm »
Its true that lava golems would be a better choice but i wanted to use something different. plus i like growing all of them in one turn instead of slowly growing the lava golems.

2
False Gods / Re: Hate FG's?
« on: June 30, 2010, 01:12:25 pm »
what deck do you use?

3
False Gods / Re: Hate FG's?
« on: June 29, 2010, 01:35:02 am »
thats a good point.  i just get frustrated easily because i hate to lose.

4
General Discussion / Re: My pet's and I
« on: June 23, 2010, 07:46:19 pm »
my worst  pet is a chrysaora because i was playing shrieker rush and couldnt use it  :-[
my best pet was a phase dragon against FG's because i was playing osiris

5
False Gods / Hate FG's?
« on: June 22, 2010, 02:20:49 am »
Does anyone else hate playing against FG's now?  its been a long time since ive played this game and ive been back on for about 2 months now (not playing very much. mostly on the forums).  today i just started playing fg's again after many hours researching on the forums.  i use my own version of SG's deck because i used to use her ultimate deck and i loved the way it played.  i've only played 14-15 games today but ive only won 3... i won 4 cards though  :D.  i lost to decks i never used to lose to such as morte miracle and incarnate(which made me want to stop).  then after playing obliterator and seism 5 games in a row i wanted to shoot myself and decided to stop farming for now.  anyone else ever feel like this?

6
Darkness / Re: New Gargoyle Deck
« on: June 20, 2010, 04:05:28 pm »
im not sure because i havent really used an unupped version of this deck.  the problem i have with the unupped deck is that it has less damage so i never tested it.  i know the unupped version works against ai3.  also take into consideration that i didnt do significant testing against t50 with this deck.  i  wouldnt advise using unupped against t50.

7
Air / Re: In Development: Wings | Wings
« on: June 20, 2010, 02:51:19 pm »
i like the new wings a lot better.  I like the turn based shields and with the added skills it make some really fun decks.

8
Darkness / Re: New Gargoyle Deck
« on: June 20, 2010, 02:23:24 pm »
It works unupped but i would recommend not to use the deck unupped.
i took 2 eclipses and daggers for this reason:
having 2 drastically improves chances of getting one early, also if one gets destroyed you have a backup since you need the damage output

9
War Archive / Re: War #2 Building an Army - Slave Market
« on: June 18, 2010, 06:36:45 pm »
ok youve got a point and i said it better the first time i posted it.  what i was saying is post your preference like: i would like to play for  :aether the most and  :air the least.  i just think if you are going to enter this war you should be willing to play for any element.

10
War Archive / Re: War #2 Building an Army - Slave Market
« on: June 18, 2010, 06:06:19 pm »
i still disagree with the veto system.  Like i said... if you dont want to play an element then dont enter or if you would rather not play an element then just say so in your description.  Also, don't you have to post the cards, score, money, etc that you have?  if you don't have any cards of one element and little money im sure the master of that element wouldnt bid on you.

11
War Archive / Re: War #2 Building an Army - Slave Market
« on: June 18, 2010, 12:53:17 am »
I'm thinking about calling this: Mercenaries Guild but it's not final yet.
I like it :))
i also agree on the feelings thing.  people should know that the more experienced players and more well known players are going to receive more bids and the less experienced ones may only receive a few or none depending on how well they sell themselves.

12
War Archive / Re: War #2 Building an Army - Slave Market
« on: June 17, 2010, 07:07:19 pm »
And this war people actually got teams they wanted to play in.

In war #2 Masters will "buy" people to whichever element, and no one sees a problem there?
I do. Obviously the event is to big to make random teams. I don't like the idea.
I wouldnt exactly call it random since the masters are bidding on who they want

Pages: [1] 2 3
blarg: