Guest posts by RedWarrior0

61

Card Idea Competition Submissions / Shard | Shard of Endurance

« on: August 12, 2010, 04:32:02 pm »

NAME: Shard ELEMENT: Other COST: 1 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: - ABILITY: It looks like a crystal shard. It seems to be useless, but it might be upgradable.	NAME: Shard of Endurance ELEMENT: Other COST: 5 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: - ABILITY: Target creature's ability increases in cost and can be used multiple times per turn

ART: Shard art on the competition thread, unupped is just Shard of Gratitude unupped IDEA: RedWarrior0 NOTES: Part of the Shard Madness competition. The ability works like this: First, if it costs 0, the ability returns to default. This includes mutants that have been SoR'd Second, the ability cost is increased by 1 and then doubled Third, if the ability is "Dive", then the cost increases by 2N, where N is the creature's current attack. In other words, the fairly powerful ability of an Otyugh now costs 5, but for the relatively hefty boost in price, it can chomp all it wants in a turn. A FFQ can now spawn all the fireflies it wants for 6​​​​​​​​​​ The "unlimited uses per turn" is removed by Shard of Readiness. SERIES: None

62

Competitions / Re: Card Design Competition: Shard Madness!

« on: August 12, 2010, 02:31:21 pm »

Is there unupped shard art?

Shard | Shard of Endurance
(http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,11115.msg146522#msg146522)

63

Card Art / Re: Mr. Unstable Gas

« on: August 12, 2010, 06:23:25 am »

To me it seemed like some kind of fire spirit with a top hat. Then I learned how alchemy cards were the element in a bottle, then I realized what it was.

64

Patch Notes and Development News / Re: Elements 1.25

« on: August 12, 2010, 02:25:24 am »

Bug fix:
- The skill berserk was not working in pvp games. It does now.
- Nightfall and Eclipse now should work properly if used at the same time
- Using multiple graveyards/boneyards grants a correct number of skeletons even when creatures die while affected by shields

Best.  Update.  Evar.

It means that they shouldn't stack. There was something f'd up about playing Nightfall then Eclipse.

65

Gravity / Re: Chimera

« on: August 12, 2010, 01:33:46 am »

Okay, awesome having alt art as a reward for donating. Hopefully that's a precedent that will be followed.

66

Card Ideas and Art / Re: Eagle's Feather|Large Eagle's Feather

« on: August 12, 2010, 01:24:10 am »

Fixed the description bit, unfortunatley planplan's card creator has it set that I can't actually have the symbols in the card decription section, I however made it a little easier to understand.

Make the card using Planplan's generator, leaving space for quanta. Then use an image editing software to put the quantum symbols in.

I'm pretty sure there was an idea similar to this already, and it would be a pain on dragons, especially in a UG Fire-Air. Bomb the opponent, then use freaking DIVING RUBEH DRAGONS!!!

67

Life / Re: Forest Scorpion | Scorpion

« on: August 11, 2010, 09:17:11 pm »

I fractal forest spectres in my speed rainbow deck, why not this?

Good thought.
Pro to using this: it doesn't use quanta to keep getting powerful; if the scorp dies the damage stays; Adrenaline can be long-term better
Con: Adds +1 damage/turn instead of +2; Purify vulnerability (and Purify's gonna get a lot more use)

68

General Discussion / Re: Weekly Featured Cards poll - Darkness

« on: August 11, 2010, 02:37:06 pm »

Just coming off a close loss to Decay, I really can't decide. I would've won if s/he didn't have Dusk out, or if s/he didn't cancel out the healing from my bonds+shards using a 48+ damage Siphon, our perhaps if s/he didn't steal my first hourglass... I guess I'll vote for LS because of its variety of uses. It would make the most interesting article among the options.

69

Outdated Tutorials / Re: How to Become Uber, Step by Grindy Step

« on: August 10, 2010, 08:41:19 pm »

Two up, two losses to AI5. PU'd Obsidian and triple Bond-Staff-Spine combo.

70

Anvil Archive / Re: Quantum Flash | Quantum Flash

« on: August 10, 2010, 08:12:51 pm »

Why not change "Timely" to "Temporal"?

71

Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?

« on: August 09, 2010, 09:15:32 pm »

I want to know how much of your karma is from this deck, Amilir. Good job.

Not having many upped cards or electrum, this deck is why I always skip 35-card Entropy T50.

72

Duo-Decks / Re: Easy false god beater (good chance for perfect)

« on: August 09, 2010, 08:42:01 pm »

This deck is... unique. Wow. Totally did not expect what I saw.