73
Rainbow Decks / Re: Mind Riot
« on: November 29, 2010, 10:08:43 pm »
Lol I'm in a similar position for ups... Generally have to up 1-2 cards for rainbows... Monos on the other hand can be expensive... Dam pillars :p
Guest Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
74
General Discussion / Re: Will Elements Make any More Elements?
« on: November 29, 2010, 10:03:33 pm »
If I understand correctly, the reason for no multi element cards is that it would be extremely difficult/impossible with the current game code, and thus would require a massive rewrite.
75
Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?
« on: November 29, 2010, 03:52:38 am »
Even just with the 2 imp AM's in the deck, you can do a lot of damage to incarnate with his vamps. This is especially true if you AM them with eclipse up, then destroy it. That way they heal you for 8 damage and hurt him for 8 damage every turn 
.
.
76
Tournament Archive / Re: Eastern Tournament - 27 November 2010 - Pandora's Toolbox - upgraded
« on: November 27, 2010, 05:53:14 am »
Lol crap I forgot that the time wasnt changed by daylight savings time... ah well .
.
77
Tournament Archive / Re: Western Tournament - 27 November 2010 - Pandora's Toolbox - upgraded
« on: November 26, 2010, 09:49:27 am »
Not sure why they wouldnt be. The only things that arent allowed are creatures which arent fate eggs/nymphs, and fire lance/ice lance/siphon life.
78
False Gods / Re: Most humiliating FG defeats
« on: November 26, 2010, 09:47:37 am »
Lol I used that quint because I wanted to fractal destroyers and I just had the one out, so I didnt want to quint it. His was already AM'd anyways so I didnt have any reason not to quint it . And yeah thats the only way he's a threat, which is why having an oty pet makes him a joke bc you can eat all his creatures the turn he casts them .
. And yeah thats the only way he's a threat, which is why having an oty pet makes him a joke bc you can eat all his creatures the turn he casts them .
79
False Gods / Re: Most humiliating FG defeats
« on: November 26, 2010, 08:03:00 am »
Lol Oty pet vs paradox is epic win... especially when I start with 3 quantum towers and 2 snovas . Easiest victory against him I've ever had basically... not that he's ever really hard...
(http://imageplay.net/)
. Easiest victory against him I've ever had basically... not that he's ever really hard... (http://imageplay.net/)
80
Round 5 / Re: Nume (Death) Win - Demagog (Earth) No Contest
« on: November 26, 2010, 08:00:15 am »
Heh I log on all full of turkey and such, to find out I already won my round 5 match 
. Guess I wont complain lol.
. Guess I wont complain lol.
81
Competitions / Re: Voting: Rock, Paper, Scissors Competition
« on: November 25, 2010, 07:01:27 am »While thats true, I'd have to say the odds of 28 quantum pillars (84 total quanta) not averaging to make 3 time quanta per turn would be pretty low, especially considering they'd have the whole game to generate quanta before that, and would presumably have time mark (though he didnt have marks which was why his deck isnt included I believe)Technically, the quantum towers could decide to hate you as well.Now that I checked the original thread, I found a submission by twinsbuster that might be even more 100% effective than this one (and though more boring)Actually that one isnt 100 percent, since there were 28 quantum pillars which means it would be possible for the eternity + photon one to do enough damage before drawing an explosion/steal. QuantumT's decks literally are 100 percent, even in the most optimal scenario for any of them.
. Not that any of that matters since its not even in the competition... lol.
82
Competitions / Re: Voting: Rock, Paper, Scissors Competition
« on: November 25, 2010, 04:53:03 am »Now that I checked the original thread, I found a submission by twinsbuster that might be even more 100% effective than this one (and though more boring)Actually that one isnt 100 percent, since there were 28 quantum pillars which means it would be possible for the eternity + photon one to do enough damage before drawing an explosion/steal. QuantumT's decks literally are 100 percent, even in the most optimal scenario for any of them.
83
Trio & Quartet / Re: Three Turn to kill Deck. What?!
« on: November 25, 2010, 03:27:11 am »
Lol . May want to recheck that once more .
. May want to recheck that once more .
84
Trio & Quartet / Re: Three Turn to kill Deck. What?!
« on: November 25, 2010, 02:28:41 am »
Err is it supposed to have quantum towers rather than entropy pendulums?