133
Would like to see some more flying weapons
This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Comparing the upped versions between "Bumble Bee" and "Cockatrice":Really like that idea, it's an interesting thought and nothing else has it. Unique idea's are certainly better than repeating the same card with different versions.
-Both have an ATK: 5
-Both cost 3
-Cockatrice has a DEF of 5, Bumble Bee has 3, so Cockatrice can survive a lot of CC.
-Bumble Bee can be sac'ed to infect a creature and is Airbourne, Cockatrice has no ability, but Bumble Bee would be subject to more CC.
in the end, Bumble Bee gives up -2 DEF, but picks up a little CC and Airbourne. Given how the low DEF opens up the CC against Bumble Bee, I think it's a fair trade off for the abilities it gets. Bottom line, the card is well balanced and a good addition to Life.
The only suggestion I could give is maybe give the upped version "Virus: Sacrafice this creature to inflict one poison to target creature or player."
I should have been specific and mentioned that. That was my logic but... this is why I need a machine to translate what i'm thinking into text so nothing is misunderstoodHeres a little extra info. When a Bumble Bee stings you it dies a few minutes later.Well, I like this card but I always have something to say to critisize stuff.the wordHeavily disagree. It's a bee. It bumbles. It looks non threatening until... oh wait! *sting!*, thus, the 'virus' aspect. Also, it will very likely be airborne, which horned frog is not. So please read through the comments to see opinions / questions. If you had you would understand that airborne does give it the advantage and it can kill other creatures.
First take the word "Bumble" out of its name cuz that just makes it sound lame.
2ndly, we already have the "Horned frog which is the same thing for one less quanta" In most situations you wont sacrifice a 3 quanta creatuer just for 1 poison damage a round so horned frog is alot more powerful than this, making this slightly... underpowered.
2 other things: In description: art says "none" where I believe it should say Kamietsu. And airbourne is misspelled (missing the e at the end)
Well, I like this card but I always have something to say to critisize stuff.the wordHeavily disagree. It's a bee. It bumbles. It looks non threatening until... oh wait! *sting!*, thus, the 'virus' aspect. Also, it will very likely be airborne, which horned frog is not. So please read through the comments to see opinions / questions. If you had you would understand that airborne does give it the advantage and it can kill other creatures.
First take the word "Bumble" out of its name cuz that just makes it sound lame.
2ndly, we already have the "Horned frog which is the same thing for one less quanta" In most situations you wont sacrifice a 3 quanta creatuer just for 1 poison damage a round so horned frog is alot more powerful than this, making this slightly... underpowered.