85
Air / Re: Gas Rush
« on: November 09, 2010, 08:47:40 am »
Definately dragons.
Look at all the excess air quanta.
Look at all the excess air quanta.
Guest Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
86
Crucible Archive / Re: Frog General | Elite Frog General
« on: November 09, 2010, 05:42:21 am »So, now Life rushes are TWICE as fast as before. -_-Assuming they can still rush and save 10/8 quanta for a creature with only 3/4 HP
87
Duo-Decks / Holy Ascension (Light+Air)
« on: November 08, 2010, 09:29:02 am »
This is my attempt at a flying Stars deck.
6 Stars may look like a lot but farming t50 for a week will give you good results.
(Ty MrBlonde and 10 men for those farm decks
The quanta usage is a bit fiddly, Pegasi use air every turn if you want to dive them, so I recommend replacing them with either dragons or replace some pillars with pendulums.
The deck:
I haven't tested it that much but it is well capable for AI3.
6 Stars may look like a lot but farming t50 for a week will give you good results.
(Ty MrBlonde and 10 men for those farm decks
The quanta usage is a bit fiddly, Pegasi use air every turn if you want to dive them, so I recommend replacing them with either dragons or replace some pillars with pendulums.
The deck:
I haven't tested it that much but it is well capable for AI3.
88
Duo-Decks / Fastest deck out there?
« on: November 04, 2010, 11:11:04 am »
Very cool duo of Air and Entropy here inspired by a deck in the t50 that my golem rush lost to.
Basically Wyrm+Chaos Power+Dive=win.
This deck is EXTREMELY fast.
Good for t50 and ai3 (haven't bothered with ai5 or FGs).
The lightning storms are to help Eagles Eye do it's job-take down threating creatures ASAP.
Diving a Wyrm usually takes priority over playing a Wyrm because of the massive damage a chaosed Wyrm can do.
Weakness's are enemy cc (RT hurts BAD) and powerful perms. An early Dev/Pest/Quanta denial is also a pain.
EDIT 1: I'm not kidding when I say this might be one of the fastest decks in the game.
EDIT 2: After testing this deck further, you might wanna add some more damselflies and lose some of those storms.
Discuss.
89
Deck Compilations / Re: A lot of decks(Plese Submit your own,too!)
« on: October 30, 2010, 08:51:16 am »
I always find that your decks are too fat.
Bigger decks dont mean bigger damage. It means that you'll have less chance of drawing the card that you need.
Stick it to the bare minimum and don't add uneeded copies.
I mean, come on, you're running 6 fractals AND 12 creatures? 4 Fractals and like 8 creatures would be better.
Bigger decks dont mean bigger damage. It means that you'll have less chance of drawing the card that you need.
Stick it to the bare minimum and don't add uneeded copies.
I mean, come on, you're running 6 fractals AND 12 creatures? 4 Fractals and like 8 creatures would be better.
90
Deck Compilations / Re: A lot of decks
« on: October 29, 2010, 09:36:03 am »
-Contructive Criticism-
In the Oty deck, you'll probably have a hand full of baby otys with nothing to eat. The damage output doesn't look very good either. Add some chargers and possibly a shield?
Well, it looks like you're going for the rab swarms raw damage rather then the devour ability. I'd leave around 2 dragons, 2 Anubises, less Time towers, less glasses, no aether towers (aether pendulums instead) and maybe actually add some TUs?
Cut it down to 4 Leaf Dragons, 4 RoLs, add some owls eye instead of the glory and maybe some animate weapons or even some shockwaves.
This post isn't intended as flame btw.
In the Oty deck, you'll probably have a hand full of baby otys with nothing to eat. The damage output doesn't look very good either. Add some chargers and possibly a shield?
Well, it looks like you're going for the rab swarms raw damage rather then the devour ability. I'd leave around 2 dragons, 2 Anubises, less Time towers, less glasses, no aether towers (aether pendulums instead) and maybe actually add some TUs?
Cut it down to 4 Leaf Dragons, 4 RoLs, add some owls eye instead of the glory and maybe some animate weapons or even some shockwaves.
This post isn't intended as flame btw.
91
Anvil Archive / Re: Battlestar | Galactic Battlestar
« on: October 28, 2010, 07:59:52 am »
What happens if you strap on an adrenaline to that...
92
Religion / Re: If you could ask God one question....
« on: October 26, 2010, 07:39:40 am »
Can jeebus come back to earth nao pls?
93
Deck Help / Re: Life/Fire combination deck question
« on: October 25, 2010, 08:33:11 am »
Rip out everything you don't need and carry only essential cards.
94
Entropy / Re: Upgraded AI3 Farmer
« on: October 25, 2010, 05:19:17 am »
What I meant was if you had 2 nymphs and 30 upgraded cards, why make an AI3 farmer instead of a t50 or FG farmer.
95
Issue Archive / Re: Cheating on leaderboard
« on: October 24, 2010, 02:39:04 am »No way!The thing is, [name removed] decks aren't even that great.Brazilian hater...
I vs him all the time in t50 and end up winning 80% of the time.
All he has is a butt load of upgraded cards.
EDIT: Looked at it again and I saw #1 and #2...
That looks really fishy...
Im just saying that [name removed] doesn't make good decks. He just throws in a buttload of upped cards of the same elements.
96
Entropy / Re: Upgraded AI3 Farmer
« on: October 23, 2010, 01:04:14 pm »If you had that much electrum to have a fully upgraded 30 card deck and a nymph, you might as well create a FG farmer or t50 farmer instead of opting for AI3You could probably farm AI3 using the same deck without any upgrades...Yes, you could, but the winning % would drop.
Maxwell's Demon unupgraded can die to its ability, if you're going agaisnt a entropy deck.
Antimatter with get 2 more Entropy quantum unupgraded, and you couldn't play atleast some cards in your first hand without the upgraded pillars.
:|