37
Off-Topic Discussions / Re: POST YOUR EPIC XTH POST HERE!
« on: November 28, 2010, 02:29:29 pm »
Not sure... kinda hard to tell the difference 
Guest Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
38
Off-Topic Discussions / Re: POST YOUR EPIC XTH POST HERE!
« on: November 28, 2010, 01:35:59 am »
Post #666
In tribute, I'd like to summon Kael Hate's childhood playmate below.
In tribute, I'd like to summon Kael Hate's childhood playmate below.
39
Game Suggestions and Feedback / Re: Rainbow Decks are awesome, and that's stupid.
« on: November 28, 2010, 01:31:15 am »
Aside from the rainbow debate, the OP did have an interesting idea- creatures get bonuses for sharing the same element as the mark.
Although the OP's idea is a bit OP, I'd be fine with "If 4 or more creatures on your side of the field share the same element as the mark you are playing, and no other creatures from other elements are in play on your side, all creatures you control get +1/+1." I could even stack with Eclipse if it isn't too OP.
However it could/would theoretically work, there's no doubt more emphasis could be applied to mono decks, or at least mono creature decks with spalshed permanents and spells. Point is I think the idea has merit and worthy of discussion.
Although the OP's idea is a bit OP, I'd be fine with "If 4 or more creatures on your side of the field share the same element as the mark you are playing, and no other creatures from other elements are in play on your side, all creatures you control get +1/+1." I could even stack with Eclipse if it isn't too OP.
However it could/would theoretically work, there's no doubt more emphasis could be applied to mono decks, or at least mono creature decks with spalshed permanents and spells. Point is I think the idea has merit and worthy of discussion.
40
Post Your PvP Event Ideas Here / Re: Upped War? Is it possible?
« on: November 27, 2010, 07:23:30 pm »No offense, but pointing out typos is not always a good idea on this forum as many people speak English as second language here and those that use it as a first can be prone to mistakes like anyone else. Might just want to keep on topic unless the typo is so great that it is unclear as to the intent of the author.Well, then we will have players with fully upped decks, fighting players will half-upped decks. When the latter lose, they will complain that they only lost because the opponent had upped cards and they didn't. The event would most likely be decided based on who has the most upped cards, not based on who has the most skill.
The playing field has to be fair, meaning that all teams must have access to exactly the same amount of upped cards. I don't see any way of accomplishing this, other than forcing players to use upped cards.
Typo in red.
41
Tournament Archive / Re: Western Tournament - 27 November 2010 - Pandora's Toolbox - upgraded
« on: November 27, 2010, 07:14:58 pm »
Round 2
Kuross - 2
Kobisjeruk - 0
Was a damn close second match and I thought for sure he was going to win it! GGs
Kuross - 2
Kobisjeruk - 0
Was a damn close second match and I thought for sure he was going to win it! GGs
42
Tournament Archive / Re: Western Tournament - 27 November 2010 - Pandora's Toolbox - upgraded
« on: November 27, 2010, 06:11:40 pm »
Round 1
Kuross: 2
Jen-1: 0
Kuross: 2
Jen-1: 0
43
12 Lives - Battle Results / R4: Kuross 3 - ji412jo 2
« on: November 27, 2010, 04:52:40 pm »End of Round 4 results
|
Kuross - 3 Lost:
ji412jo - 2 Lost:
Good matches in all with some really close matches to. Was fun all the way through!
Match 1 (Win)
Code: [Select]
5i4 5i4 5i4 5i4 5i4 5i4 5i9 5i9 5ia 5ib 5ib 5ib 5ie 5ie 5ie 5ie 5ii 5ii 5ii 5jm 5jm 5jm 5jm 5jm 6rq 6rq 6rq 6rq 6rq 7gqMatch 2 (Loss)Code: [Select]
5uk 5uk 5uk 5um 5um 5um 5um 5um 5um 5ut 5ut 5ut 5ut 5ut 61o 622 622 622 63a 63a 63a 63a 63a 63a 63a 7t9 7t9 7t9 7t9 7ta 7taMatch 3 (Win)Code: [Select]
55k 55k 55k 55k 55k 55k 55q 55q 55q 55r 55r 55r 55v 55v 55v 55v 55v 55v 576 576 576 576 576 576 745 745 745 745 745 745Match 4 (Loss)Code: [Select]
55k 55k 55k 55k 55k 55k 55q 55q 55q 55r 55r 55r 55v 55v 55v 55v 55v 55v 576 576 576 576 576 576 745 745 745 745 745 745Match 5 (Win)Code: [Select]
4vj 4vj 4vj 4vj 4vj 4vj 55q 55q 55q 55q 576 576 576 5c7 5c7 5c7 5c7 5lf 5lf 5t2 5t2 5t2 5t2 5ur 7q1 7q1 7q1 7q1 7q1 7q1
44
12 Lives / Re: 12 Lives Battle Thread (Hosted by RavingRabbid)
« on: November 27, 2010, 04:50:28 pm »End of Round 4 results
|
45
Game Suggestions and Feedback / Re: Trainer: Choose False Gods
« on: November 27, 2010, 02:23:23 pm »
'Tis been suggested many, many times over and the general answer is "until such time one, who can competently program the Trainer, steps forth and offers his or her service, the Trainer will stay as is."
46
Nerf This Card! / Re: Toadfish
« on: November 27, 2010, 12:51:32 am »My point islol, should have had that humble pie instead of pumpkin
Theoretically: people shouldn't value cheap weak cards over expensive powerful cards.
Actually: people do over value speed.
I have been agreeing with you.
Gotcha now
47
Introduce Yourself / Re: Hello Elements!
« on: November 27, 2010, 12:50:00 am »
Welcome all to the forums!
I, to, was a lurker for some time before I finally got active. Wish I had been more active sooner as this community definitely rocks and is a lot of fun to hang with
Look forward to seeing you guys (nonemo and Face) in chat or elsewhere
I, to, was a lurker for some time before I finally got active. Wish I had been more active sooner as this community definitely rocks and is a lot of fun to hang with
Look forward to seeing you guys (nonemo and Face) in chat or elsewhere
48
Post Your PvP Event Ideas Here / Re: Upped War? Is it possible?
« on: November 27, 2010, 12:45:33 am »
To be honest, I don't see why it's not possible. I think people hear the words "upped" and "WAR" and have a negative kneejerk reaction. If 60-70 people signup for the event I guess the question is "why not?"