37
Crucible Archive / Re: Resonance | Improved Resonance
« on: October 03, 2010, 01:19:50 am »
Its fine, works well with supernova too since you can't have too many of those. 
Guest Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
38
Game Suggestions and Feedback / Re: Nymph Metamorphosis
« on: October 02, 2010, 08:11:46 am »
If it was expensive, there would be more use for electrum in the game. =/
But thats mainly for old and experienced players, who probably would still go on elements to do the oracle spin once a day for their nymphs. :p
But thats mainly for old and experienced players, who probably would still go on elements to do the oracle spin once a day for their nymphs. :p
39
General Discussion / Re: [Poll] How many nymphs do you have?
« on: October 02, 2010, 04:16:59 am »
Won't it be complicated if you have to check both nymph threads for updates? Your old description was fine, IMO.
40
Nerf This Card! / Re: Black Hole | Black Hole
« on: October 02, 2010, 04:14:32 am »
But then again, there are more counters for discord than black holes...
41
Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?
« on: October 01, 2010, 11:01:17 am »
I don't use fractal, and you've usually already won by the time you use fractal anyway.
42
Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.24) CC? Why bother?
« on: October 01, 2010, 06:00:45 am »
o.o Forest scorpion?
I guess its useful if you use fractal, but won't it die early or waste one of your quints?
Zsotti was talking about Dune scorpions, but there are no cards which boost attack in the deck...
I guess its useful if you use fractal, but won't it die early or waste one of your quints?
Zsotti was talking about Dune scorpions, but there are no cards which boost attack in the deck...
43
Rainbow Decks / Re: malignant mutants
« on: October 01, 2010, 05:59:01 am »
The strange thing is that he said that this deck has a higher win rate, from what i see its pretty slow since you have to wait for the FG to deck out sometimes. o.o
Its still an interesting concept, but has a lot of not-so-needed cards inside with only one copy, which makes it pretty hard to get the cards you want.
Its still an interesting concept, but has a lot of not-so-needed cards inside with only one copy, which makes it pretty hard to get the cards you want.
44
Crucible Archive / Re: Shatter | Shatter
« on: October 01, 2010, 05:54:49 am »
You need both air and fire quanta to fire the nymphs, which is pretty rare for the opponent since air doesn't synergise with fire, and its hard for the opponent to get so much air quanta. Nymph decks are not rush decks too, so you can also include a few wings into the deck to stall, and rush decks usually don't have CC.
45
Forum Game Archive / Re: The ^ < v Game by Appawesome
« on: September 30, 2010, 02:56:11 pm »
^ Yuck!
< Yum!
V Smelly...
< Yum!
V Smelly...
46
Crucible Archive / Re: Shatter | Shatter
« on: September 30, 2010, 02:55:31 pm »
What if you clone 5 air nymph? That'll be way OPed.
47
War Archive / Re: War - Guess the winners (and losers) of War and win 8 upped Shards!
« on: September 30, 2010, 08:13:21 am »
Yay for the most interesting elements to me.