Guest posts by FallenSoul

73

Crucible Archive / Re: Glare | Glare

« on: June 29, 2010, 10:07:31 pm »

You could add a poll to see what people thought the cost should be

done

74

Card Ideas and Art / Re: Resurrection | Reborn

« on: June 29, 2010, 10:03:24 pm »

yes, i know, i simply didn't know there was already the same card concept

75

Crucible Archive / Re: Glare | Glare

« on: June 29, 2010, 09:01:54 pm »

yes, but it effects only enemy creatures, not yours..
sundial effect every creature instead..
about the quantum price.. i already write i'm not sure of how much it should cost..

76

Crucible Archive / Re: Rebirth | Resurection

« on: June 29, 2010, 08:58:15 pm »

it's "resuRRection", not "resuRection"
however, i've had a similar idea.. and even names were similar >.<
reborn | resurrection
but.. what if it doesn't remove ability? (i haven't dediced about stats.. if they turned to the original or not..)

77

Card Ideas and Art / Re: Resurrection | Reborn

« on: June 29, 2010, 08:56:08 pm »

>.<
even the name.. but mine is correct (resuRRection) xD
well.. nevermind so.. i didn't seen the cards in the crucible, my bad..
however mine (even if it's now discarded) is a little different 'cause it doesn't remove ability (i haven't dediced about stats..)

78

Card Ideas and Art / Resurrection | Reborn

« on: June 29, 2010, 05:56:30 pm »

NAME: Resurrection ELEMENT: COST: 7 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: - ABILITY: Select one of your creatures, when it dies, put in game a copy of that creature.	NAME: Reborn ELEMENT: COST: 5 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: - ABILITY: Select one of your creatures, when it dies, put in game a copy of that creature.

ART: - IDEA: FallenSoul NOTES: i'm not sure about the quantum cost.. (if it's interesting, i'll add art soon..) SERIES: -

79

Card Ideas and Art / Re: Requesting Light Ideas for the Crucible

« on: June 29, 2010, 05:44:29 pm »

i wonder if this idea can be interesting..

http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,8861.new.html#new

80

Crucible Archive / Glare | Glare

« on: June 29, 2010, 05:43:36 pm »

NAME: Glare ELEMENT: Light COST: 3 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: ABILITY: Enemy creatures are Blinded for a turn.	NAME: Glare ELEMENT: Light COST: 1 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: ABILITY: Enemy creatures are Blinded for a turn.

ART: http://www.reloded.com/media/Sky.jpg IDEA: FallenSoul NOTES: Enemy creatures that are in play when this spell is played are blinded for a turn. Blind: creature have a 75% chance to miss with their attack. SERIES: -

81

Card Ideas and Art / Re: Battlelord | Warlord

« on: June 28, 2010, 11:07:31 pm »

Since it will be rare for battlelords to be on both sides of the field why not elimminate that clause

yes, that's an option, i only included it 'cause i found funny to improve even the enemy's creature putting in play the same card..

82

Anvil Archive / Re: Soulsteel | Soulsteel

« on: June 27, 2010, 10:14:32 pm »

i really like it, but i agree that maybe it's ability should have a quantum cost

83

Card Ideas and Art / Battlelord | Warlord

« on: June 27, 2010, 07:25:16 pm »

NAME: Warlord ELEMENT: COST: 6 TYPE: creature ATK|HP: 3/4 ABILITY: Battle Craziness: Warlord gains +1/+1 for each creature (not malignant cell) on your opponent's side, have atk/N and hp/N where N is the number of Warlord on your side of the field, and gains +2/+0 for every Warlords on your opponent side of the field.	NAME: Warlord ELEMENT: COST: 8 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 6/6 ABILITY: Battle Craziness: Warlord gains +1/+1 for each creature (not malignant cell) on your opponent's side, have atk/N and hp/N where N is the number of Warlord on your side of the field, and gains +2/+0 for every Warlords on your opponent side of the field.

ART: - IDEA: FallenSoul NOTES: Well.. i'm not sure about the element ( or  or others) or the atk/hp cost, i just find that ability idea fun. however the main function is to have something that can counter a little a swarm of creatures on the opponent side, but can't be "fractalized" so can't become OP.. SERIES: -

84

Card Ideas and Art / Re: Cursing | Improved Cursing

« on: June 27, 2010, 06:46:48 pm »

I think you should change the card name to "Curse".

well i agree with this, my first option was curse in fact, but i didn't really undersand why it's "blessing" insead of "bless", so i opted for this name

a cheaper version that does not do HP damage, but just weaken the attack.

it would be an option, however i choses this one because i think it yould be fun to weaken creature's both in hp & atk
like golden dragon or firefly queen (because with this card it would be more simple even to take them down)
 however even your idea is interesting ^^