385
Forum Game Archive / Re: Vending Machine 2.0
« on: November 03, 2010, 10:50:00 am »
You get 
(D'oh!)
Insert: myself
(D'oh!)Insert: myself
Guest Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
386
Humor / Re: Defeat my superhero (game)
« on: November 03, 2010, 10:36:26 am »
A dragon? pfffff you have nothing to do with The Killer Rabbit of Caerbannog. It will bite you, masticate you, and then belch with violence.
387
Crucible Archive / Re: Thanatos | Thanatos
« on: November 03, 2010, 10:32:56 am »
Is a good card. Maybe reduce a bit the upgraded one's attack.
388
Forge Archive / Re: Random Hamster | Random Hamster
« on: November 03, 2010, 10:28:45 am »
Hum.... interesting. But why doesn't it starts with 0/1 and only gains attack? Otherwise it could be too powerful
389
Anvil Archive / Re: Necronomicon | Necronomicon
« on: November 03, 2010, 10:25:49 am »
Well. I think its a bit OP, but the idea is great and after fixed for the game it will be very useful.
390
Crucible Archive / Re: Ice Behemoth | Ice Behemoth
« on: November 03, 2010, 10:21:48 am »
Uf... did you think about the damage done by a couple of them, lets say, if I fractal? Or it could'n be fractaled due to his passive ability?
If I have enough quanta, 5 of them will do 60 damage points in a single turn. That's crazy.
I'm totally opposed to creatures that naturally do this amount of damage. I think that dragons had to be the top amount of damage. Otherwise, the game ends too fast.
If I have enough quanta, 5 of them will do 60 damage points in a single turn. That's crazy.
I'm totally opposed to creatures that naturally do this amount of damage. I think that dragons had to be the top amount of damage. Otherwise, the game ends too fast.
391
Forge Archive / Re: Shield of Relativity | Shield of Relativity
« on: November 03, 2010, 10:11:17 am »
It could fix in TIME if it resets when no damage is done at all. But it will be very similar to the actual time shield.
392
Anvil Archive / Re: Necronomicon | Necronomicon
« on: November 03, 2010, 09:39:43 am »
I really loved this card when I saw it first time.
393
Card Ideas and Art / Re: Tornado | Twister
« on: November 03, 2010, 09:29:08 am »Actually, it does prevent both sides, as well as absorb quanta. I guess it needs to be specified. It's not exactly fair if you play it otherwise. In that battle, if both players had that card, the one who played it first would win. This card would be best with creature spam decks, or rush decks if you're trying to slow down the opponent. The original idea blocked both spells and permanents, but since that would stop pillars, it was decided that was too much.Ok. I like it. Good job
394
Humor / Re: Defeat my superhero (game)
« on: November 03, 2010, 12:36:47 am »
But... you are just a torso. My Otyugh's lunch.
395
Crucible Archive / Re: Domestic Dog | Hunting Dog
« on: November 03, 2010, 12:08:49 am »
Call the unupgraded version "Puppy" and you have my vote 
396
Card Ideas and Art / Re: Tornado | Twister
« on: November 03, 2010, 12:06:43 am »
It absorbs 3 random quanta or 3 
per turn?
I like it but maybe 5 turns to prepare your side of the field is so much. How about if it affects both players and you remove the quanta absorbing? It would be funny for a rush deck without perms. Hey guys, no shield! Goooo!
per turn?I like it but maybe 5 turns to prepare your side of the field is so much. How about if it affects both players and you remove the quanta absorbing? It would be funny for a rush deck without perms. Hey guys, no shield! Goooo!