Guest posts by Drobbit

349

Crucible Archive / Re: Growing Entity | Shrinking Entity

« on: November 05, 2010, 11:41:29 pm »

both are OP imo. One quantum tower can afford the cost of the unupped and obviously the upped one gives quanta and also damages.
i suggest to increase the quanta cost of the unupped and decrease the starting attack/deffense of the upped.

350

Crucible Archive / Re: Radioactive Dump | Radioactive Dump

« on: November 05, 2010, 11:33:48 pm »

(http://imageplay.net/view/m7Gbd101788/simpsons_blinky_fish)

definitely this is the image 

351

Humor / Re: Defeat my superhero (game)

« on: November 05, 2010, 09:37:37 pm »

Nothing to do with Martian Manhunter and his large list of powers (including the power of dominating Galactus to destroy himself)

352

Card Ideas and Art / Re: Wheel of Time | Wheel of Time

« on: November 05, 2010, 09:23:25 pm »

I've got a nice idea for the upped one that suits better to the stile of the card.
Hope you like. If I don't get to much votes I can go back to the last version (+3/3 instead of +2/2).

EDIT: thinking about your future comments. I have to say that you need 3 turns, 8 and 9 to destroy any targetable creature and that creature will have +4/4 before being destroyed (no way OP imo)

But you also could benefit yourself from the counters IF (big if) you play wisely. Because bad luck can give you the third counter and your "big mama" oty will pass away. But in any case, the cost is 6 to do that and there are still a lot of cards that can manage with that creature and some will still prefere to have the creature quinted instead of that.

353

Card Ideas and Art / Re: Wheel of Time | Wheel of Time

« on: November 05, 2010, 09:09:17 pm »

I had some problems and I thought to wait for any comment before posting the upped one. But I'll try again now.
Thanks for your words

354

Crucible Archive / Re: The Moirae | The Graeae

« on: November 05, 2010, 08:57:06 pm »

This is different to the old dune scorpion. The old one could be fractalled and easily played and with momentums/blessings/chaos seed it could own the targets deck
but with this one it costs 3 time to do it thats more than the old dune scorpions cost so I think its pretty balanced

Thats what I think, but...

355

Humor / Re: Defeat my superhero (game)

« on: November 05, 2010, 08:51:04 pm »

Phoenix from X-men can beat him, and destroy the planet to

356

Humor / Re: Defeat my superhero (game)

« on: November 05, 2010, 07:48:18 pm »

Batman has no power so he can beat her easily

357

Card Ideas and Art / Re: Magma|Magma

« on: November 05, 2010, 05:51:53 pm »

that's why I proposed to sacrifice your own permanents to destroy opponent ones

358

Card Ideas and Art / Re: Magma|Magma

« on: November 05, 2010, 03:55:24 pm »

If you don't want to pay maintenance, you can do it this way: "sacrifice a permanent: destroy target permanent". It fits perfectly with fire. You could even low the cost.

359

Crucible Archive / Re: The Moirae | The Graeae

« on: November 05, 2010, 01:11:19 pm »

I don't personaly believe in forum polls. Some people doesn't think before voting and most votes aren't justified. But thats not the debate. Please, talk about my last option.

360

Card Ideas and Art / Re: Wheel of Time | Wheel of Time

« on: November 05, 2010, 01:09:01 pm »

Don't think so, as it shall not work on burrowed creatures. Otherwise it would be OP.